Subscribe free to our newsletters via your
. Military Space News .

US, N.Korea Might Have New Direct Contacts: US Negotiator

The United States has refused to negotiate directly with North Korea over its nuclear weapons program and has opted for a multilateral approach bringing in China, Japan, South Korea and Russia.
Washington (AFP) Aug 09, 2005
The United States might have new direct consultations with North Korea while six-party talks over Pyongyang's nuclear program are in recess, the US envoy to the negotiations said here Tuesday.

Christopher Hill said he expected a flurry of bilateral diplomacy among all the parties before the talks resume the week of August 29 in Beijing where they recessed Sunday after 13 grueling days.

"I can't speak yet to the contacts with the North Koreans although I imagine there will be some, but we haven't had them yet," a clearly exhausted Hill told reporters a day after returning to Washington.

"If there is value to direct contacts we would have them, just as we have been having them certainly since I've been around," said Hill, assistant secretary of state for East Asian and Pacific affairs.

The United States has refused to negotiate directly with North Korea over its nuclear weapons program and has opted for a multilateral approach bringing in China, Japan, South Korea and Russia.

But US and North Korean negotiators held nine bilateral meetings within the framework of the six-party discussions that resumed in Beijing on July 26 after a 13-month hiatus.

Before that, the United States, which has no diplomatic relations with North Korea, made occasional contact through Pyongyang's UN mission in what came to be called the "New York channel."

Asked whether the next consultations would be through the New York channel, Hill responded, "I don't know yet, we'll have to see what they would like to do."

The Beijing talks recessed without agreement on a statement of principles for denuclearizing the Korean peninsula. One major stumbling block was Pyongyang's insistence on retaining a civilian nuclear program.

Hill acknowledged the difficulty in responding to North Korea's request for light-water reactors for the peaceful use of nuclear energy.

But he added, "I would not assume that every difference that emerged at the very end of the talks represents a serious difference or a deal-breaker type difference."

The veteran diplomat would not comment on chances that negotiators would reach an agreement when the talks resume.

"In Dayton (for the Bosnia peace talks) I always felt we would. In Rambouillet, the Kosovo negotiations, I always felt we wouldn't. In this one, I just don't know. I just don't know."

All rights reserved. 2005 Agence France-Presse. Sections of the information displayed on this page (dispatches, photographs, logos) are protected by intellectual property rights owned by Agence France-Presse. As a consequence, you may not copy, reproduce, modify, transmit, publish, display or in any way commercially exploit any of the content of this section without the prior written consent of Agence France-Presse.

Related Links
Search SpaceWar
Subscribe To SpaceWar Express

Six-Party Talks Unlikely To Break US-NKorea Deadlock In Near Future
Beijing (AFP) Aug 07, 2005
The United States and North Korea must make major U-turns to narrow the big gaps still separating them after 13 gruelling days of nuclear disarmament talks, analysts say.

Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News

Subscribe free to our newsletters via your

The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2016 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement All images and articles appearing on Space Media Network have been edited or digitally altered in some way. Any requests to remove copyright material will be acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. Any attempt to extort money from Space Media Network will be ignored and reported to Australian Law Enforcement Agencies as a potential case of financial fraud involving the use of a telephonic carriage device or postal service.