Subscribe to our free daily newsletters
. Military Space News .




Subscribe to our free daily newsletters



Ambiguous Iran Reply In Nuclear Showdown Could Split West Say Analysts

Iran's nuclear negotiator Ali Larijani.
by Staff Writers
Washington (AFP) Aug 22, 2006
Despite a call from Iran Tuesday for further negotiations on its suspect nuclear program, Washington seemed as intent as ever on pressing for UN sanctions that some analysts see as a slippery slope towards military confrontation. Iran's nuclear negotiator Ali Larijani said Tehran was ready "for serious talks" with countries leading demands that it suspend a uranium enrichment program which could help it produce nuclear arms.

Larijani provided no other details of a written response given Tuesday to an incentives package offered by the United States and five other powers to entice Iran to give up uranium enrichment and other suspect nuclear activities.

Even before the full content of the Iranian response was known, senior US officials were reaffirming their position that only a total cessation of Iran's uranium enrichment by a UN Security Council deadline of August 31 would avert sanctions.

"We will obviously study the Iranian response carefully, but we are also prepared, if it does not meet the terms set, to proceed here in the Security Council ... with economic sanctions," said the US embassador to the United Nations, John Bolton.

"I think we will be prepared to submit elements of a resolution in the council very quickly," he said.

Most observers had expected Iran on Tuesday to avoid a direct rejection of the enrichment suspension demand while at the same time refusing to give in to the UN requirement it abandon the program as a precondition for further talks.

"The Iranians will likely agree to negotiations that may lead to at least a temporary suspension, but not agree to this as a precondition," said Trita Parsi, a writer who has had extensive contacts with the Iranian leadership.

"As disappointing as this response may be for Washington, it should not be seen as the end of the negotiating track," said Parsi, author of the forthcoming book "Treacherous Triangle -- The Secret Dealings of Iran, Israel and the United States".

Iran's conditional response to the UN ultimatum is expected to prompt renewed debate in the US administration between those seeking dialogue with Iran, as promoted in the past by some in the State Department, and hardliners identified with Vice President Dick Cheney.

Parsi and other experts warned that a win by proponents of immediate sanctions carried grave risks.

"Doing so would put the US on the slippery slope towards military action, because none of America's allies believe that UN sanctions will be effective," said Parsi.

James Marsh, director of the Security Studies program at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, agreed and said a US rush to impose sanctions could also split the fragile alliance built up over the issue among the permanent UN Security Council members -- Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States.

"You can tell by Iran's comments in advance of this response that they are seeking to divide the Europeans and the Americans," Marsh said.

"Any appearance on the part of Iran that it is willing to be serious about negotiations will give the Chinese, the Russians and to some extent the Europeans reason to want to avoid escalating the political crisis, and that means at this point voting for sanctions," he said.

US officials have been reluctant to spell out exactly what sanctions Washington will seek at the UN if Iran fails to meet the August 31 deadline.

A senior State Department official would only say it would be a "multi-stage process" beginning with "targetted sanctions".

These are expected to include relatively minor actions like bans on travel by Iranian nuclear or other officials and restrictions on government contracts with Iranian enterprises.

But the UN has the authority to impose more wide-ranging trade sanctions that could have a significant impact on the Iranian economy.

Fuller sanctions will also impact on European and other economies which have extensive trade relations with Iran, either as exporters to the Islamic republic or importers of its oil.

"The Iranians have been preparing themselves for sanctions, calculating that they won't be very harsh and they will be just as costly, if not more costly, to the Europeans," Parsi said.

"Sooner or later the Europeans will break ranks," he said.

Source: Agence France-Presse

Related Links
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com

Commentary: Iran Scores In World War
Bern, Switzerland (UPI) Aug 22, 2006
Those who gazed into their crystal balls at the end of the 20th century to get a glimpse of coming attractions missed the main event. Islam, whether in the form of young jihadis who live to die killing those who live to live in freedom, or conservative oil sheikhs and emirs clinging to divine-right-of-kings privileges by heaping praise on Hezbollah guerrillas, dominates our fear of what the future may bring. Perception is reality in most parts of the world but nowhere as much as in the Arab world and in the Muslim world beyond. Hezbollah, or "Party of God," listed as a terrorist organization by the United States, is now seen as the clear victor over Israel, the only democracy in the Middle East. For Israel to lose 116 soldiers is comparable to the United States losing 5,800 in 34 days of warfare (multiply by 50 to get the equivalent population ratio). So far, the U.S. has lost 2,600 in three and a half years in Iraq).







  • Russian Military To Practice Repelling Invasion From East
  • Is The CIS Getting Divorced
  • F-22 Raptor To Be Deployed To The Northern Pacific
  • US Department Of Defense In Cash Crunch

  • Commentary: Iran Scores In World War
  • Ambiguous Iran Reply In Nuclear Showdown Could Split West Say Analysts
  • Uranium Enrichment At Heart Of Iran Nuclear Dispute
  • Defiant Iran Vows To Press On With Nuclear Work

  • Louisville Facility To Build NLOS-LS Precision Attack Missile
  • Raytheon's Louisville Facility to Build NLOS-LS Precision Attack Missile
  • Iran Tests Tactical Missile During War Games
  • Raytheon Company Awarded $266M Standard Missile-3 Contract

  • US Navy To Double Aegis Missile Defenese Fleet
  • BMD Focus: Japan's long road on BMD
  • Britain Is Potential Site For US Missile Defence System
  • General To Recommend US Missile Defense Sites In Europe Soon

  • US Sanctions On Russia Could Hurt Boeing
  • Boeing Puts Aircraft Market At 2.6 Trillion Dollars
  • Innovative Solutions Make Transportation Systems Safer Secure and Efficient
  • Joint Strike Fighter Is Not Flawed Finds Australian Government

  • Iranian Businessmen Supplied Tehran With German Drone Technology
  • New Electric Propulsion Motor Systems for UAVs Developed by Bental Industries
  • Global Hawk Flies High Sees All in Rim of the Pacific Navy Exercise
  • New Electric Propulsion Motor Systems for UAVs Developed by Bental Industries

  • Premature Iraq Pullout Would Be A Huge Mistake Warns Bush
  • Benchmarks: Insurgents Keep Up Pressure
  • Leaks Likely On Iraq National Intelligence Estimate
  • Outside View: Where U.S. Generals Failed

  • Analysis: Guard Needs More Equipment
  • Raptor Meets New Challenges, Expands Capabilities
  • Raytheon Dramatically Improves Troposcatter Bandwidth
  • Lockheed Martin Demonstrates Volume Search Radar Antenna For US Navy DDG-1000 Program

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement