Subscribe to our free daily newsletters
. Military Space News .




Subscribe to our free daily newsletters



Analysis: Bush's last attempt in Iraq

disclaimer: image is for illustration purposes only
By Claude Salhani
Washington (UPI) Dec 21, 2006
There is a nasty premonition circulating inside the Washington Beltway that President George W. Bush will attempt one final stab at the heart of the Iraqi conundrum as a last-ditch effort to regain the upper hand in the fight for Iraq.

But before he can set out for a second attempt to gentrify Iraq, the president plans to increase the size of the U.S. Army and the Marine Corps, hoping to build a force powerful enough to create a military surge in Iraq. The president has indicated his desire to boost the number of troops on active duty and has indicated his plan enjoys the support of several top generals.

What is the logic behind such a move this late in the game? Why would the president choose to do this now when the talk around Washington lends itself more to discussing troops reduction in Iraq rather than escalating the conflict?

The answer is because the president would rather not take into consideration the Hamilton-Baker Iraq Study Group's report that suggested reducing the role of American combat troops.

The bipartisan report, which took nine months to produce, offers the Bush administration an "honorable exit" from Iraq and a face-saving opportunity to turn away from what has become a complex situation that is getting more complicated by the day.

In accepting the study group's findings, the president would have to seriously consider cutting back on U.S. troops in Iraq.

A premature withdrawal while Islamist insurgents, Sunni and Shiite militias and assorted gunmen are doing their best to keep Iraq engaged in sectarian conflict as the country slips precariously towards civil war would be seen as a defeat for the United States.

So Bush, now with about two years left in his second mandate, wants to go out with a bang. A big bang. And for that you need a bigger army and more Marines. You need more boots on the ground.

Bush's plan, it would seem, would be to "flood" Iraq with U.S. troops. There would be American fighting troops every which way you turn. The logic is that the superior numbers of American troops will have a better handle on the situation, all while stepping up the training program of Iraqi forces. By the time Bush leaves the Oval Office in 2008, he would be handing to his successor a much more subdued Iraq.

That at least is the theory; the beefing up of American troops in Iraq might seem like a good idea, but in practice it looks very different. Furthermore, the plan comes three years too late.

This is what should have happened at the outset of the U.S. military intervention in March 2003. An overwhelming military force at the beginning of the invasion would have made a big difference, then. Additional troops at that time would have guaranteed law and order. They could have prevented a breakdown of authority. There would have been no rioting, looting of museums, ministries, shops, homes and offices. Had the invading U.S. Army shown itself to be stern from the very first day, had there been ample numbers of troops to maintain law and order, it is quite possible that the chain of events would have unfolded in a very different manner.

But remember, then-Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld was opposed to sending more troops. But now, more than three years down the road, injecting several tens of thousands of U.S. troops into Iraq presents more of a disadvantage.

Committing tens of thousands of additional forces to Iraq may yield limited results but it also exposes so many more Americans to the inevitable daily violence that has become the norm in Iraq; the roadside bombs, attacks against American military positions that have been growing steadily month by month.

Consider this: committing several tens of thousands of American troops to Iraq who are more likely than not to engage in heavy combat operations, causing more damage and casualties among Iraqi civilians will only serve to further infuriate Iraqi, Arab and Muslim public opinion, and to build more hatred towards the United States. In short, it would be counter to everything the Baker-Hamilton report recommended.

(Comments may be sent to Claude@upi.com.)

Related Links
Iraq: The first techonology war of the 21st century

Outside View: Short-changing Iraq
Washington (UPI) Dec 18, 2006
President John F. Kennedy, speaking to the graduating class of the U.S. Naval Academy on June 7, 1961, stressed the importance for military professionals to understand the use of four elements of national power: diplomacy, information, military and economic, or DIME.







  • Russia Against US Missile Defense Plans For Europe
  • Analysis: Three crises pileup?
  • Policy Watch: U.S.' adversaries and Iraq
  • Isolation Of Russian Far East Threat To National Security

  • Russia Seeking To Extend Use Of Cold War Missile Stocks
  • US Naval Buildup In Gulf Shows Enduring Presence
  • France Orders Six Barracuda Class Nuclear-Driven Submarines
  • LockMart Delivers Hardware For 3rd Advanced EHF Military CommSat

  • LockMart-Built Trident II D5 Launched In Two-Missile US Navy Test
  • LockMart Announces Firing Of Hellfire II Missile During French Evaluation
  • Raytheon Awarded Contract For Missile Launcher Production
  • Pakistan Test Fires Nuclear-Capable Missile

  • New Radar At Lekhtusi: A Shield Against Missile Attacks
  • South Korea Eyes Independent Missile Defense System
  • BMD Watch: Bob Gates backs BMD
  • BMD Focus: Collision course with Russia

  • IATA Gives Cautious Welcome To EU Emissions Trading Plan
  • EU Proposes CO2 Emission Quotas For Airlines
  • Shoulder Ligament A Linchpin In The Evolution Of Flight
  • EU Compromises On Airlines In Carbon-Trading Scheme

  • Warfare Center To Host Autonomous Unmanned Vehicle Fest 2007
  • Northrop Grumman Lifts US Navy To New Era For Unmanned Flight
  • Boeing Australia To Provide Australia Its First Tactical UAV
  • Boeing, U.S. Air Force Demonstrate UAV Automated Aerial Refueling Capability

  • Outside View: Short-changing Iraq
  • Outside View: Syria must be involved
  • Analysis: Bush's last attempt in Iraq
  • Analysis: Iraq militias run police chiefs

  • New Antenna Begins Testing
  • Crews Test Latest Stryker Vehicle
  • ATK Pioneering Air Bursting Ammunition Technology Selected by US Navy
  • Star-P Uses Supercomputers In Support Of Futuristic Military Vehicles

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement