Washington (AFP) April 16, 2011
As NATO countries weigh whether to arm Libya's rebels, military planners may give a thought to adding a remote "kill switch" to some weapons to keep them out of the wrong hands, experts say.
Even if allied governments conclude that building in a remote control to disable anti-tank launchers might be more trouble than it's worth, the mere possibility is transforming the role of high-tech weapons in warfare.
"The more advanced technology becomes, the more it becomes integrated in networks, the more opportunities there are for attacks," David Lindahl, a research scientist at the Swedish Defence Research Agency, told AFP.
The growing sophistication of modern weaponry, with its reliance on electronic circuits and robotics, has fueled speculation that the United States or other powers might choose to turn off their weapons remotely -- or secretly sabotage the enemy's high-tech systems.
The original version of a "kill switch" dates back to the peak of the Cold War, when permissive action link (PAL) devices were introduced in the 1960s to prevent a rogue launch of a nuclear missile.
But Lindahl and other technology specialists say there is no evidence that the United States or other countries use remote "kill switches" in other weapons.
Designing a remotely controlled switch would be a costly, complicated undertaking, and few defense companies would be enthusiastic about inserting a vulnerable link into one of their products, experts said.
If Western countries chose to retrofit anti-tank missiles for Libya's rebels with "kill switches," they would still face the risk that adversaries might eventually get a hold of the weapons and uncover design secrets, Lindahl said.
"It's incredibly risky to do something like that," he said.
As chip manufacturing has migrated outside the United states, American defense officials have long worried about foreign countries finding a "backdoor" into the Pentagon's sensitive weapons systems.
"There are two ways to look at this. You build them into your own weapons, or the second way is you unwittingly incorporate them into your own weapons because someone sold you a bad chip," said James Lewis, a cyber expert at the Brookings Institution think-tank and former US official.
To guard against possible sabotage, the Pentagon has tried to ensure a secure supply of microchips by certifying some fabrication plants in the United States, known as the Trusted Foundries Program.
But defense manufacturers, no longer able to avoid using commercial off-the-shelf products, face growing risks to their supply chain and software, experts said.
"The military systems nowadays are not purpose-built from scratch. You have soft systems surrounding them," Lindahl said.
Fears that foreign-made chips could contain secret codes that would allow an adversary to disable or seize control of a weapon may be overstated, said Lewis.
"It's something you have to be concerned about, that you have to think about when you build the weapon, but it's harder to do than it looks," Lewis said.
He added that "concerns about supply chain can easily shade into paranoia." Technology bloggers and experts have long speculated that Israel may have manipulated Syria's radar when it bombed a nuclear facility in 2007.
Syria's high-tech air defenses should have detected the Israeli jets but bloggers say the country's radar -- using off-the-shelf chips -- may have contained tainted processors with secret "backdoors," allowing Israel to somehow disable or deceive the radar.
The strike on Syria illustrates how sometimes just the idea of a dangerous microchip is just as effective as the genuine article.
"If there is a kill switch, it makes sense the Israelis would use it. If it doesn't have a kill switch, it makes sense they would spread the rumor," Lindahl said.
Share This Article With Planet Earth
The latest in Military Technology for the 21st century at SpaceWar.com
PEO Ammo Picks Up 155mm Lightweight Howitzer Program
Picatinny Arsenal NJ (SPX) Mar 21, 2011
The Program Executive Office for Ammunition has expanded to add towed artillery systems to the growing list of products that it manages for the military. On Jan. 20, Army Acquisition Executive Malcolm O'Neill approved the immediate transfer of the Program Manager Lightweight 155 office located here from the Program Executive Office Ground Combat Systems, headquartered at Warren, Mich., to ... read more
Netanyahu thanks Obama for 'Dome' missile funding|
'Most challenging' US missile defense test a success
Obama urged to limit Russia missile shield sway
Tracking Ballistic Missiles From 'Birth-to-Death'
Answering The Warfighter's Call For Joint Air-To-Ground Missile
Raytheon Delivers Record Number of Evolved SeaSparrow Missiles
US helps eliminate Ukraine's Scud missile stockpile
Boeing Receives Contract for SM-3 IIB Concept Design
Unmanned military aircraft get a boost
Northrop Grumman Ships First Broad Area Maritime Surveillance Fuselage
US drones kill six militants in Pakistan: officials
Drone 'friendly fire' kills two US troops: officials
Preparations Underway As US Army Gears Up For Large-Scale Network Evaluations
Global Military Communications Market In 2010
Raytheon BBN Technologies To Protect Internet Comms For Military Abroad
Gilat Announces New Military Modem For Robust Tactical Satcom-On-The-Move
Australian military abuse could lead to payouts
High-tech weapons sow fears of chip sabotage
Next Gen Helicopter Operations Surveillance System (HOSS) Camera Comes To US Navy
Raytheon Receives Best Value Thermal Weapon Sight Delivery Order
E-2D Advanced Hawkeye Program Completes DAB Review
India and China to resume defense contacts
Israel eyes used F-15s to fill for F-35s
Pentagon probe clears McChrystal after sacking
Clinton vows full support for disaster-hit Japan
Senior US senators launch week-long China trip
Weakened America a 'laughingstock,' Trump laments
US shares Georgia concerns on Russia: Clinton
MLD Test Moves Navy A Step Closer To Lasers For Ship Self-Defense
US Navy And Northrop Grumman Accomplish Goals For At-Sea Demonstration Of Maritime Laser
Scientists Build World's First Anti-Laser
Yale scientists build 'anti-laser'
|The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2010 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement|