Subscribe free to our newsletters via your
. Military Space News .

Leading defence firms 'not transparent enough': study
by Staff Writers
London (AFP) Oct 04, 2012

A large majority of the world's biggest defence companies do not provide enough evidence that they adequately prevent corruption, campaigners Transparency International UK said in a study on Thursday.

The pressure group analysed the top 129 global defence firms and has published its Defence Companies Anti-Corruption Index, which grades from A-F how effectively companies combat corruption.

Almost two thirds, or 85 companies out of 129, were judged to have inadequate information available on their anti-corruption policies, and scored the bottom grades of D, E or F.

"Two-thirds of the world's biggest defence companies do not provide enough public evidence about how they fight corruption," Transparency International UK said in a statement.

"This includes companies from all of the ten largest arms exporting nations like USA, Russia, Germany, France, the UK and China -- who between them are responsible for over 90 per cent of the arms sales around the world."

Those registering the bottom F grade included Abu Dhabi Shipbuilding, Aviation Industry Corporation of China, French arms manufacturer Nexter, Israel Military Industries and Kawasaki Heavy Industries.

French aerospace group Dassault Aviation, Japan's Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, and US naval defence group DCNS were among companies which scored an E grade.

Nearly half of companies, or 60 firms out of 129, scored the worst grades E and F, meaning that they had very little or no evidence of having basic systems in place to prevent corruption and instil strong ethical values.

"Corruption in defence is dangerous, divisive and wasteful. The cost is paid by everyone," said Mark Pyman, author of the study and director of Transparency International UK's defence and security programme.

"Governments and taxpayers do not get value for their money and clean companies lose business to corrupt companies. Money wasted on defence corruption could be better spent."

The campaign group estimated that the global cost of corruption in the defence sector was a "minimum" of $20 billion (15 billion euros) per year, and cited data from the World Bank and the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

Transparency added that just ten companies scored in the top two bands -- A and B -- meaning that they have publicly demonstrated in considerable detail the systems and procedures that they have in place to prevent corruption.

Those ten companies included Britain's BAE Systems, France's Thales, Japan's Fujitsu and US groups Northrop Grumman and United Technologies.


Related Links
The Military Industrial Complex at
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at

Comment on this article via your Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail login.

Share this article via these popular social media networks DiggDigg RedditReddit GoogleGoogle

Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News

Lawmakers looking at BAE-EADS merger plan
London (UPI) Oct 3, 2012
The proposed merger of aerospace and defense conglomerates BAE Systems PLC of Britain and the Netherlands' EADS NV is coming under government scrutiny. The Defense Committee of Britain's House of Commons is to begin an inquiry into the proposed joining of the companies and the possible effect such a move would have on the country's defense industry and national defense relationships wit ... read more

US pushing Gulf nations to develop missile defense

Israel postpones vital Arrow-3 flight test

N. Korea blasts US plan for new radar base in Japan

US to station second X-band missile radar in Japan

Lockheed Martin's DAGR Missile Demonstrates Ground Launch Capability In Guided Flight Tests

US Army, Navy Demonstrate JLENS' Ability to Defeat Anti-ship Cruise Missile

S. Korea near deal on longer missile range: report

India follows Pakistan with missile test

Isn't it time to stop drone wars?

US weighing drone strikes in north Africa: report

AUVSI Welcomes Formation of Senate Unmanned Aerial Systems Caucus

The next wave in US robotic war: drones on their own

Raytheon to provide Joint Tactical Terminal radios with latest security features to US Navy

Northrop Grumman Awarded Contract to Extend BACN Communications Connectivity to the Tactical Edge

Hughes Awarded Custom SATCOM Solutions Contract by GSA

4 SOPS begins testing newest AEHF satellite

Lockheed Martin Completes Centralization Of Targets and Countermeasures Operations in Huntsville

US hails war vehicle that saved lives, bypassed bureaucracy

Raytheon MALD-J Decoy Goes 4 for 4 in Operational Flight Tests

Raytheon and PACAF expand the reach of realistic training environments

EADS/BAE tie-up could face US opposition, analysts say

Leading defence firms 'not transparent enough': study

Lawmakers looking at BAE-EADS merger plan

US charges 11 in Russian military exports ring

Pentagon chief Panetta heads to Latin America

Outside View: American Exceptionalism

Japan PM adds China balm in cabinet reshuffle

Chinese govt ships enter disputed waters: Japan

Nanoparticles Glow Through Thick Layer of Tissue

All systems go at the biofactory

Electrons confined inside nano-pyramids

A Tecnalia study reveals the loss of nanomaterials in surface treatments caused by water

The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2014 - Space Media Network. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement