Subscribe to our free daily newsletters
. Military Space News .




Subscribe to our free daily newsletters



Outside View: Uncertain Iraqi Allies

Iraqi soldiers prepare for a patrol as US Bradley Fighting Vehicles is stationed to support them duirng a mission operated by US-Iraqi joint forces 04 September 2005 in Baghdad. Formed after the ousting of Saddam Hussein, Iraq's new army is slowly growing stronger but still far from able to stand on its own feet without the support of US troops. AFP Photo/Liu Jin.

Cleveland (UPI) Sep 01, 2005
In an August action In Iraq, 3/25, Cleveland's Marine Reserve unit lost six men, two sniper teams, under circumstances that were unclear. I recently received information on that incident that raises a very important question, a question with strategic, not merely tactical significance.

I was told (not by anyone in 3/25) that the six Marines were ambushed and killed by Iraqi troops they were attached to.

Let me say up front that I cannot confirm this report. Because I cannot confirm it, I am using it not to make a point but to raise some questions. The questions are, did this happen? If it did, why were the American people not told? And - this is the question with strategic importance - how often is this happening in Iraq today?

The reason the question has strategic meaning is that the Bush administration's strategy, if it can be called that, for avoiding outright defeat in Iraq is to build up the Iraqi armed forces and police until the war can be turned over to them. If those same Iraqi forces are attacking American troops on a fairly frequent basis, that is a significant piece of evidence the strategy is not working.

History suggests that it was never very likely to work. Over and over, invaders have tried to raise proxy armies to do much of the fighting for them. Only a minority of the troops Napoleon used to invade Russia were French; most were coerced from reluctant "allies" the French had previously defeated, like Prussia. Not surprisingly, as soon as it could get away with it, the Prussian corps went over to the Russians.

World War II offers a similar lesson. Hundreds of thousands of Russians taken prisoner by the Wehrmacht changed sides. Many were absorbed into regular German units as Hiwis, "willing helpers."

Others formed a whole separate pro-German Russian Army under a Russian general, Vlasov. As a friend in Washington recently said, compared to "our" Iraqi forces, the Vlasov Army looked pretty good. But like most such forces, when faced with real combat, it and the Hilfswillige melted away.

Of course, there is also our own experience in Vietnam. Remember "Vietnamization?" It reflected the same strategy the Bush administration is now following: build up the armed forces of a friendly local government and let them do the fighting.

Some Army of the Republic of (South) Vietnam (ARVN) units did fight. But the Vietnamese on the other side had a whole lot more motivation. As Saigon is now Ho Chi Minh City, will Baghdad one day be Sadr City or, worse, Osama City? I seem to see Clio, the ancient Greek muse of history, nodding "yes."

If the American public is to assess whether or not we are succeeding in Iraq, it needs to be told when Americans are attacked by the "friendly" Iraqi government forces they are working with. Again, I cannot confirm that this happened to the six snipers from 3/25. But if it did happen and the public was not told, the Bush administration will have been caught in yet another lie.

That, too, has strategic significance in a war we were lied into in the first place. If a strategy initially based on lies must rely on more lies for its continuation, it is probably not pointed toward success.

Other evidence already suggests that our attempt to create our own Iraqi armed forces is not working. The police do an excellent job of disappearing whenever the insurgents show up.

Most of the latest Iraqi Army recruits are Pesh Merga or Shiite militiamen who are putting on different uniforms while maintaining their old loyalties. The insurgents have infiltrated everywhere; recently, U.S. forces have begun disbanding - sometimes forcibly - the Iraqi National Guard we previously created, because it has been so thoroughly penetrated.

If, on top of this, our troops in Iraq are being attacked frequently by Iraqi government troops, and this information is deliberately being withheld from the American people, the crystal ball has turned black. So, President Bush, just what did happen to those six snipers from 3/25?

(William S. Lind, expressing his own personal opinion, is Director for the Center for Cultural Conservatism for the Free Congress Foundation.)

(United Press International's "Outside View" commentaries are written by outside contributors who specialize in a variety of important issues. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of United Press International. In the interests of creating an open forum, original submissions are invited.)

Related Links
SpaceDaily
Search SpaceDaily
Subscribe To SpaceDaily Express

Bridge Disaster Marked Black Week In Iraq
Washington (UPI) Sep 01, 2005
It was a very bad week in Iraq - one of the worst. And that was the case no matter which metrics one chose to assess. Overshadowing everything was the horrendous death of almost a thousand people in Wednesday's disaster on the Aimma Bridge over the Tigris River.







  • Common Interests Bring China And Russia Together
  • First China-Russia War Games End But Future Drills Mulled
  • US Hopes Sino-Russian Maneuvers Don't Destablize Region
  • US Congress Urged To Press For Details On Plan For Global Troop Realignment

  • Top Pakistan, India Officials Hold Peace Talks
  • Peace Process Format On Agenda At India-Pakistan Talks
  • EU Again Warns Iran On Nuclear Programme
  • Pakistan Gets Eight Orion Patrol Aircraft From US

  • Vandenberg Launches Minuteman III
  • Advanced Photonix Wins Contract For TOW Missle Program
  • Raytheon Names Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System II Team
  • BAE Systems Awarded Contract For Mk 41 Vertical Launching System Canister Production

  • NGC, EADS, Indra Team To Pursue NATO Theatre BMD Contract
  • Russia hints At ABM Cooperation With Europe
  • Army Missile Defense Going South
  • BMD Still On Track, Says Obering

  • Pakistan Air Force To Hold Big War Games
  • Aviation Transformation Includes New Aircraft, Upgrades
  • China Issues License To Egypt Manufacturer To Build Fighter Jet Trainer
  • Lockheed Martin's System Helping FAA Train New Controllers

  • BAE Systems Achieves First Flight Of Its Next-Gen Vertical Takeoff UAV
  • Northrop Grumman Nears Completion Of First Next-Gen Global Hawk
  • LockMart Contracted To Study Integration Of U.S. Navy's Aerial Surveillance Systems
  • Northrop Grumman Wins U.S. Navy Contract to Study Maritime Surveillance Concepts

  • Bridge Disaster Marked Black Week In Iraq
  • Outside View: Uncertain Iraqi Allies
  • Outside View: Exiting Iraq
  • In Mosul, The Stryker Shows Its Worth

  • Boeing, BAE Systems Team For US Air Force B-52 Stand-Off Jammer Proposal
  • NGO Accuses Norway Of Investing In Antipersonnel Mine Makers
  • Integrating Advanced Weapons On Current Aircraft, Sooner and at Lower Cost
  • DRS To Produce Infrared Assemblies For Javelin Missile Command Launch Unit

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement