by Staff Writers
Washington (AFP) Nov 24, 2014
President Barack Obama announced the departure of US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel on Monday, with the White House under fire over perceived fumbling in its response to the Islamic State threat.
The former Republican senator, who has been in the job for less than two years, was chosen to oversee a shift to a peacetime military with smaller defense budgets, but found the United States at war again.
Rapid advances by Islamic State jihadists in Syria and Iraq forced the Pentagon chief into managing a complex campaign, and Obama concluded Hagel was not the man for the task.
The 68-year-old Vietnam war veteran joined Obama at the White House to confirm his departure.
"When I asked Chuck to serve as secretary of defense we were entering a significant period of transition: the drawdown in Afghanistan, the need to prepare our forces for future missions and tough fiscal choices to keep our military strong and ready," Obama said.
"Last month, Chuck came to me to discuss the final quarter of my presidency and determined that, having guided the department through this transition, it was an appropriate time for him to complete his service."
Hagel thanked Obama for his "friendship," saying he believed he had put the military and the nation on a "stronger course toward stability."
On jihadist websites and Twitter accounts, Islamic State supporters celebrated "victory" against Hagel, claiming he had been forced out by their successes against US allies on the battlefield.
Both Obama and Hagel presented the decision as mutually agreed, but administration officials privately suggested he had been pushed out, while Obama's critics said Hagel had been frustrated by White House meddling.
Some commentators said Hagel had run afoul of Obama's aides by siding with military commanders in internal policy debates, but officials denied the claim.
White House spokesman Josh Earnest told reporters Obama and Hagel agreed it was time for "new leadership."
"It doesn't mean that Secretary Hagel hasn't done an excellent job of managing these crises as they've cropped up, but it does mean that as we consider the next remaining two years of the president's time in office that another secretary might be better suited to meet those challenges," Earnest said.
- Possible successors -
The White House did not say who would replace Hagel at the Pentagon, but in Washington three candidates are deemed to be in the running.
The former number three-ranking official at the Pentagon, Michele Flournoy -- who would be the first woman to hold the top post -- is touted as the most likely choice, followed by former deputy secretary Ashton Carter.
Senator Jack Reed of Rhode Island -- a former army airborne officer -- has also been cited as a plausible contender, but his spokesman told reporters that he was not interested in the job.
Confirmation hearings for the nominee will give Republican senators a platform to slam the Obama administration's campaign against the Islamic State group, in the wake of elections that saw Obama's fellow Democrats in Congress suffer a major defeat.
Some hawks are demanding bolder action, including the deployment of US ground units to help Iraqi and Kurdish forces in their battle against the jihadists.
As a senator, Hagel voted in favor of the 2003 US invasion of Iraq, but later became a critic of the drawn-out conflict that ensued.
Hagel's combat experience as a non-commissioned officer who was wounded in Vietnam was seen as a strength as he took on the job.
But his public appearances have often appeared underwhelming as the administration struggles to adapt to new threats.
-- 'At odds' with White House --
Although administration officials indicated Hagel had been pressured to resign, a senior national security staff member in Congress told AFP that was not the case.
"Hagel quit," the aide said. "Hagel found himself at odds with the administration."
Hagel's experience was similar to that of his predecessors, Robert Gates and Leon Panetta, who both complained after they left office of interference by White House political appointees, some lawmakers said.
Hagel had been "very, very frustrated," said Senator John McCain, an outspoken critic of Obama's foreign policy.
"Already the White House are leaking, 'Well he wasn't up to the job.' Believe me, he was up to the job," he said.
McCain said the administration had "no strategy" to fight the IS extremists and that Hagel had never been allowed into an inner circle making decisions.
Hagel had disagreed with the administration's approach to Syria, writing a two-page memo arguing for a more assertive stance towards President Bashar al-Assad, his aides recently disclosed.
Apart from the air war against the IS group, the White House has also come under criticism for its plans in Afghanistan, with some Republicans saying US troops should stay in the country longer, beyond the end of Obama's term in two years.
The Military Industrial Complex at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com
|The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2014 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement All images and articles appearing on Space Media Network have been edited or digitally altered in some way. Any requests to remove copyright material will be acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. Any attempt to extort money from Space Media Network will be ignored and reported to Australian Law Enforcement Agencies as a potential case of financial fraud involving the use of a telephonic carriage device or postal service.|