Subscribe to our free daily newsletters
. Military Space News .

Subscribe to our free daily newsletters

Problems For The Anti-War Coalition

An anti-war protestor shows his support in Foley Square in New York 29 April 2006 during the March for Peace, Justice and Democracy. The march was just one of the many protests all over the country calling for an end to the war in Iraq. Photo courtesy of Timothy A. Clary and AFP.
by William S. Lind
UPI Outside View Commentator
Washington (UPI) May 08, 2006
One of the more amusing aspects of the debacle in Iraq has been the performance of the anti-war Left. Far from "mobilizing the masses for peace," it has had about as much impact as a slingshot on a Kaiser-class dreadnought. Seldom does it amount to more than a few aging hippies trying to relive their youth by resurrecting the Vietnam-era anti-war movement.

Their attempts recall Marx's comment that history occurs as tragedy, then repeats itself as farce.

In response to this failure, a few voices from both the Left and the Right are suggesting an anti-war alliance. Given its impotence to date --nowhere more evident than in Congress, where few Democrats dare call for a withdrawal from Iraq -- it is not clear exactly what the Left would bring to the table.

The strongest and most thoughtful voices against the Iraq War have come from real -- as opposed to neo-con -- conservatives, starting well before the war began. Further, because the Right is President George W. Bush's base, conservative anti-war voices have more political meaning than do those on the Left, which will never vote Republican under any circumstances.

Let us say, nonetheless, that such an alliance is worth exploring. It is unlikely to get us out of Iraq before the roof there falls in, but it just might manage to obstruct the next act in the neo-cons' play, a war with Iran.

If it could be kept out of the hands of the crazies, it might also give some encouragement to Members of Congress of both parties who, at least behind closed doors, realize that the whole "American Empire" madness is leading the country to destruction. Abandoning that strategy and returning to a policy of prudence should be the strategic goal of any serious "anti-war" effort, and it might also be a point on which Left and Right could agree.

But what about the many other matters on which conservatives and the Left cannot agree? In an article in The American Conservative advocating a Left-Right anti-war alliance, "Grand Coalition," Neil Clark writes, "This Peace Party would [be] a high-profile pressure group where all opponents of war would feel at home, regardless of their views on abortion, public ownership, smoking in public places, or capital punishment."

That's fine as far as it goes, especially since it means the Left will have to breathe my pipe-smoke. Unfortunately, it ignores the elephant in the parlor, namely Political Correctness. To the Left, anyone who dares contradict the dictates of the cultural Marxism of the Frankfurt School, which is what Political Correctness and "multi-culturalism" really are, is not just wrong. They are evil, "another Hitler."

So let me put some questions to those on the Left who advocate a "Grand Coalition" against more wars in pursuit of American Empire: Are you prepared to work with people who:

-- Believe America's -- and Britain's -- culture should remain Anglo-Saxon?

-- Think men and women are inherently different, and that their traditional social roles reflect those inherent differences?

-- Acknowledge distinctions between races, and among ethnic groups within races?

-- Reject egalitarianism and think differences between classes both natural and beneficial?

-- Believe all sexual relations outside marriage are sinful, and homosexual acts especially so?

-- See Victorian America and Britain as models to be emulated rather than examples of "oppression?"

-- Insist not only on believing all these things, and more like them, but also on expressing their beliefs publicly, as representing what is right, true and good?

Frankly, I doubt the culturally Marxist Left can accept any of this. To do so, it would have to acknowledge that its ideology is an ideology and not objective reality. In other words, those who argue that truth is relative would have to accept that their truths are relative, too.

For my part, as a conservative, I am willing to participate in a Grand Coalition against imperial folly even with cultural Marxists; if they want to believe the Frankfurt School crap, more the fools they. But I will do so puffing my pipe and reading Mencken as a frolicsome Irish serving wench makes sure my glass stays full. The Politically Correct Left can put that in their pipes, but if they try to smoke it, I suspect they will turn a delightful shade of green.

William S. Lind, expressing his own personal opinion, is director for the Center for Cultural Conservatism for the Free Congress Foundation. United Press International's "Outside View" commentaries are written by outside contributors who specialize in a variety of important issues. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of United Press International. In the interests of creating an open forum, original submissions are invited.

Source: United Press International

Related Links

IEDs Still Plague US Troops
Washington (UPI) May 04, 2006
The main thrust of the Iraq insurgency is not currently aimed at U.S. forces, but it shows no signs of diminishing either. In the 20 days from April 13 to May 2, 47 U.S. soldiers were killed or died in Iraq at an average rate of 2.35 per day, according to official figures issued by the U.S. Department of Defense.

  • US Strategy On Ukraine
  • Japan Aims To Revamp Rules For Military Cooperation With US
  • US And Japan Adopt Roadmap For Military Revamp
  • Bush And Putin Fail To Agree To Disagree

  • US War Doctrine And Iran
  • Iran Draft Resolution Introduced
  • South Korea Pushing US Relocation
  • Pakistan's Military Blast Indian War Game Comments

  • US Air Force Studies German Fuse For Cruise Missile
  • Pakistan Test Fires Long-Range Nuclear Capable Missile
  • MBDA And Raytheon Offer Anti-Aircraft Missiles For Estonia
  • Raytheon Awarded Contract For Patriot Upgrades

  • Lockheed Martin Receives $379M Contract For PAC-3 Missile Production
  • Koizumi's BMD Legacy
  • Canadian Prime Minister Harper Defies Ballistic Missile Defense Critics
  • LM Delivers Components For Missile Warning Satellite

  • Test Pilot Crossfield Killed In Private Plane Crash
  • Aerospace Industry Slow To Embrace New MEMS Technologies
  • BAE Systems To Sell Airbus Stake, EADS Likely Buyers
  • DaimlerChrysler And Lagardere Cut Stake In EADS

  • Boeing Phantom Works to Lead Research On X-48B Blended Wing Body Concept
  • Aerosonde Mk4 UAV Sets New Endurance Mark
  • AVID Developing New UAV Concept For Homeland Security
  • Combat Balloon To Improve Communications

  • Problems For The Anti-War Coalition
  • IEDs Still Plague US Troops
  • Corruption Still Major Problem In Iraq Finds IG
  • Iraq Partition Becomes Fashionable Policy In Washington

  • New Armored Infantry Fighting Vehicle PUMA Presented
  • NGC Successfully Demonstrates S-Band AESA Radar Capability
  • Samsung Techwin K9 Thunder Continues To Drive The Self-Propelled Artillery Market
  • Protonex Delivers Soldier Power Fuel Cell Systems To US Air Force

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement