Subscribe to our free daily newsletters
. Military Space News .

Subscribe to our free daily newsletters

Putin Reclaims Russian Clout

Russian President Vladimir Putin delivers a speech at the 43rd Conference on Security Policy in Munich, 10 February 2007. Putin launched a full-frontal attack on the United States 10 February, saying it had made the world a more dangerous place and left successive conflicts unresolved. Addressing an audience of senior officials and politicians including many from the United States and the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), Putin said the United States had "overstepped" its borders with disastrous results. Photo courtesy AFP.
by Staff Writers
UPI Correspondent
Berlin (UPI) Feb 13, 2007
The anti-U.S., anti-NATO speech by Russian President Vladimir Putin has unsettled European officials. But observers should not be surprised; his words come as part of a deliberate effort to reclaim lost Russian clout, in light of the country's recent rise as an energy superpower and the West's failure to resolve crises in the Middle East.

It was 10:37 a.m., Saturday morning in Bavaria. The who's who of the global security scene, including U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates and German Chancellor Angela Merkel, had gathered to listen to the first-ever speech of a Russian president at the Munich Conference on Security.

Pleased to be able to "avoid excessive politeness and the need to speak in roundabout, pleasant but empty diplomatic terms," Putin attacked the United States (a "unipolar" power) and NATO on most of its fronts, namely NATO's eastward expansion, U.S. unilateralism, failure in the Middle East and Washington's plan to place anti-missile systems in Eastern Europe.

Placing those systems in Poland and the Czech Republic would trigger "an inevitable arms race," Putin said. "I don't want to accuse anyone of being aggressive," Putin said, but threatened he is considering an unspecified "asymmetric" response, evoking memories of distant Cold War days.

NATO's eastward expansion, he said, "represents a serious provocation that reduces the level of mutual trust." Putin quoted former NATO Secretary-General Manfred Woerner, who promised in 1990 that NATO wouldn't station its troops eastward of Germany to give Russia a security guarantee.

"Where are these guarantees?" Putin asked, adding that Russia's troops were leaving Georgia, while at the same time NATO was stationing 5,000 soldiers in Bulgaria and Romania. In a comparison that may have reminded Merkel of the Berlin Wall, Putin said the West was trying to impose "new boundaries and walls."

While Gates followed with a somber and ironic rebuttal ("As an old Cold Warrior, one of yesterday's speeches almost filled me with nostalgia for a less complex time," Gates joked. "Almost."), the White House said it was "surprised and disappointed" by Putin's speech, but added it will continue to work with Moscow in key security areas. "We certainly disagree with the characterization of the United States acting unilaterally," White House spokesman Tony Snow said. "The United States does in fact regard Russia as an important ally."

Markus Kaim, security expert at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs, said that Putin's speech reiterated the claim for Russia to be recognized as a global power.

"This is a loud beat of the drum, with which Russia says: You can't pass us by anymore," Kaim told United Press International in a telephone interview Tuesday.

Putin's advances come at a well-timed moment: In Iraq, the West's democracy campaign and mainly the United States has taken heavy damage; Iran still refuses to stop uranium enrichment; and in Eastern Europe, conflicts are destabilizing the region. Add to that Russia's role as an energy superpower, and Putin's move (which has been heralded by several statements from Russian in the days before the conference) makes sense. U.S. unilateralism, as of now, is a thing of the past, and Putin's attack puts Washington, at least a bit, in the defensive position.

Kaim said much of Putin's speech for a greater Russian role in world politics was because the topic usually rakes in votes for the upcoming 2008 elections. Yet Kaim called many of Putin's critical points "invalid," namely the tirade against NATO's eastward expansion. The NATO-Russia Council, for example, has intensified Moscow's cooperation with the body on security matters.

Kaim warned that Russia in several key areas (Iran, Iraq, Kosovo, Eastern Europe) was "diametrically opposed" to the Europeans in their security approach, and key governments, such as the German one in Berlin, should mull rethinking their approach to Moscow.

"We have different perceptions of internal and external order, and therefore, Russia isn't really a strategic partner anymore," he said.

Another ambition Putin had was "driving a wedge in the trans-Atlantic partnership," which may have succeeded, he added.

While Putin's hard talk is not the first step toward another Cold War, several European politicians in the Munich audience appeared amused that someone finally gave Washington a talking-to. Such a view of things will not please supporters of the trans-Atlantic alliance.

Source: United Press International

Email This Article

Related Links
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at

Absence Of US-China Military Dialogue Triggers Worries In US
Washington (AFP) Feb 13, 2007
Despite years of cajoling, China is hesitant to have a defense dialogue with the United States, fuelling fears in Washington of the prospect of a conflict as the Asian giant flexes its military muscle. Sixteen months after former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld made a landmark visit to Beijing, Washington is still awaiting a promised return visit from the commander of the People's Liberation Army's powerful Second Artillery Corps.

  • Absence Of US-China Military Dialogue Triggers Worries In US
  • Putin Reclaims Russian Clout
  • Center Of World Power Shifting To Asia
  • Facing Western Supremacy

  • Iran And Barbara Ann Could Get A Replay
  • False Steps On Iran
  • US Defends North Korea Nuclear Deal As Good First Step
  • Kim Jong Il Gets A Birthday Bonanza...Heating Oil

  • Raytheon And BAE Test Fire DDG 1000 MK57 Vertical Launching System
  • India Test-Fires Supersonic Cruise Missile
  • Israeli Media Says Syria Has Tested Scud
  • Iran Seeking Longer-Range Strike Force

  • Israeli Arrow Hits Missile At Night
  • Israel Stresses Anti-Missile Test Message To Iran
  • Deployment Of US Missile Defense Could Trigger New Arms Race
  • Russia Protests US Missile Shield But Vows To Avoid Arms Race

  • Anger As Britons Face Air Tax Hike
  • Bats In Flight Reveal Unexpected Aerodynamics
  • Lockheed Martin And Boeing Form Strategic Alliance To Promote Next-Gen Air Transportation System
  • Time to test the Guardian Missile Defense System For Commercial Aircraft

  • UAV Tested For US Border Security
  • Iran Claims New Stealth Drone That Can Attack US Gulf Fleet
  • Boeing ScanEagle Team Achieves Compliance With NATO UAV Interoperability Standard
  • US Navy Buys Two Northrop Grumman Fire Scouts To Refine Concept Of Operations

  • Iraq Army Deploying On Time
  • One Size Does Not Fit All In Iraq
  • US Democratic Senators Skeptical Of Iranian Weapons Claim
  • US Bets On Iraqi Tribes For Security

  • Future Combat Systems Restructuring A Balancing Act
  • India's Showcase Chopper Crashes Ahead Of Airshow
  • Language Learning Via Video Gaming
  • Future Combat Systems Completes Experiment and Soldier-testing Of Key Technologies

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement