Subscribe to our free daily newsletters
. Military Space News .

Subscribe to our free daily newsletters

Rice Cuts No Ice In Moscow

U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.
by Viktor Litovkin
UPI Outside View Commentator
Moscow (UPI) March 02, 2007
U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has expressed surprise at Moscow's sharp criticism of American plans to deploy anti-ballistic-missile interceptors in Poland and early-warning radars in the Czech Republic. "The idea that we somehow surprised them [Russians] about missile defense and then to go and say these things about Poland and the Czech Republic, independent countries, NATO members, was, I think, unnecessary and unwarranted," Rice said in a Feb. 25 interview on Fox News.

"When it comes to missile defense, no one would suggest -- anyone who knows anything about this would [not] suggest -- that somehow 10 interceptors deployed in Poland are going to threaten the thousands of warheads in the Russian deterrent. ...What we'd like to do is to pursue with the Russians the missile defense cooperation that we once talked about."

The "iron lady" of the State Department was speaking to an audience that knows very little, if anything, about the issue.

Rice most likely knows that Kremlin officials have told their Washington counterparts more than once that the deployment of elements of a U.S. ABM system in Eastern Europe is unjustified.

The only credible argument in this case is that there is a desire on the part of the Pentagon generals and their White House bosses to inflict maximum damage on the Russian-American partnership, pit Russia against its Western neighbors, and spur on the arms race.

This is exactly what Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov referred to when he said Moscow was baffled by Washington's plans to deploy ABM elements in Poland and the Czech Republic.

There are people in Moscow who know almost everything about the ABM dispute. One of them is Col. Gen. Nikolai Solovtsov, commander of the Strategic Missile Forces.

Solovtsov has said: "If Poland and the Czech Republic make the decision (to accept a U.S. proposal to base 10 interceptor missiles and a radar in their countries), Russia's Strategic Missile Forces will aim its missiles at them."

Army General Yury Baluyevsky, chief of the Russian General Staff, supported that statement. He had earlier said that such a move by the United States would complicate bilateral relations, and that the Poles should think about "what may fall on their heads [in the event of a conflict]."

Baluyevsky has expressed disappointment with the U.S. plans in a recent interview with the state-owned newspaper Rossiiskaya Gazeta.

"We are worried over the consequences of ballistic-missile intercepts close to the Russian border, or even over Russian territory," the general said. "That is quite probable, as it is nearly impossible to completely destroy a ballistic missile armed with weapons of mass destruction, in particular nuclear weapons, without [negative] consequences for the atmosphere and land surface."

He added: "The Czech Republic and Poland probably want to protect their distant ally so much that they are prepared to tolerate a shower of dangerous debris. However, Russians have the right to ask why they should be made a hostage to that situation. Why should those who are not guilty of anything be forced to clean up the consequences?"

"We cannot regard the deployment of an ABM facility close to the Russian border as a friendly move by the United States and its eastern European NATO allies," Baluyevsky said. "In my view, the buildup of military capability close to the Russian border cannot strengthen European security."

Russian-U.S. missile defense cooperation is being hindered by the Bush administration. It does not want to give Russia technical information on certain structural elements of the ABM system, which makes cooperation impossible.

American officials have hurried to comment on the concern expressed by Russian generals over the unfriendly moves of the United States. By turning the generals' words inside out, they have concluded that after the threat made by the commander of the Strategic Missile Forces and the chief of the General Staff -- although it was not a threat but a warning -- Warsaw and Prague simply must agree to accept the U.S. ABM system.

One cannot stop wondering at politicians' talent for juggling words and notions, applying double standards, and even deceiving the public, as in the case of "Iraq's weapons of mass destruction," used as a pretext for invading that country.

(Viktor Litovkin is a military correspondent for the RIA Novosti news agency. This article is reprinted by permission of RIA Novosti. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the RIA Novosti editorial board.)

(United Press International's "Outside View" commentaries are written by outside contributors who specialize in a variety of important issues. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of United Press International. In the interests of creating an open forum, original submissions are invited.)

Source: United Press International

Email This Article

Related Links
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at

Russia Does Not Want Another Cold War
Moscow (RIA Novosti ) Mar 06, 2007
Authors who are critical of Russia's current political structure often write that the Kremlin has no proper foreign policy, or rather that its policy is so vague, anonymous, and insufficiently centralized that it can only be described as PR actions. That view is shared by people across the ideological spectrum. A few words about ideology. The system of government in Russia is based on clans - or tribes, if you like.

  • China Great Global Step Forward
  • Russia Revises Military Doctrine To Reflect Global Changes
  • How Multipolar Is Moscow
  • Russia Does Not Want Another Cold War

  • Russia To Receive Two Modernized Strategic Bombers In 2007
  • Attacking Iran Could Speed Up Nuclear Program
  • Spy Agency Defends Intelligence On North Korea Nuclear Program
  • Pakistan Tests Nuclear-Capable Ballistic Missile

  • Hunter-Viper Strike Team Completes Successful Missile Range Tests
  • Lockheed Martin And Kongsberg Defence And Aerospace To Jointly Market Joint Strike Missile
  • Raytheon HDAM Missile Successful In Test Flight Against Low-Power Radar Source
  • Raytheon Demonstrates Engine For Powered Joint Standoff Weapon Extended Range

  • Russian Bombers Could Suppress US Missile Shield
  • US Missile Shield In Ukraine And Caucasus Could Spark Regional Crisis
  • A New Missile Debate For Russia
  • US Missile Shield Would Include Caucasus-Based Radar

  • Raytheon Team Proposes Single International Standard In ADS-B Pursuit
  • NASA Signs Defense Department Agreement
  • Lockheed Martin And FAA Reach Significant Milestone In Transformation Of Flight Services
  • Can UABC Take Russian Aircraft-Makers Out Of Spin

  • New Technology Expands Air Force Combat Capability
  • Phase 2 Testing Completed For Centralized Controller For Unmanned Air And Ground Systems
  • Killerbee UAV Flies At Camp Pendleton
  • UAV Tested For US Border Security

  • Baghdad Crackdown Making Slow Progress
  • A Last Chance For Iraq
  • Who Lost Iraq
  • Building Security In Barwanah

  • Russian Air Defense To Be Based On S-300 And S-400 Systems
  • Humans Still A Factor In War
  • Raytheon Awarded Phalanx Performance Based Logistics Contract
  • Raytheon To Bid For Integrated Air and Missile Defense Battle Command System

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement