Subscribe to our free daily newsletters
. Military Space News .

Subscribe to our free daily newsletters

Saudi Worst Nightmare

File photo: An Iraqi Shiite insurgent.
by Claude Salhani
UPI International Editor
Washington (UPI) Nov 29, 2006
A precipitous withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq will result in an immediate and massive Saudi Arabian military intervention to stop Iranian-backed Shiite militias from "butchering Iraqi Sunnis."

Nawaf Obaid, a Saudi security expert who is managing director of the Saudi National Security Assessment Project in Riyadh and an adjunct fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, says that over the past year much has changed.

What was then unthinkable is now feared. A sudden departure of U.S. forces will place the future of Iraq's Sunnis in serious jeopardy from well-armed Shiite militias backed by Tehran. Numerous voices, says Obaid, have called for Saudi Arabia to protect the Sunni community in Iraq and to counter Iran's growing influence.

Obaid told United Press International that the Saudi leadership feels it would have no choice but to intervene militarily in Iraq in the event of a premature American pullout. But, adds Obaid, "I don't think they will withdraw any time soon, not any time soon."

But in politics saying one thing and following through is not always a guarantee.

And when it comes to pulling U.S. forces out of Iraq there are two opposing schools of thought. The first is that the United States will not withdraw from Iraq until the security void can be filled (by Iraqis) in order to prevent further deterioration in what is already being called a civil war. If the Bush administration still refuses to admit that the violence tearing that country apart is in fact a civil war, a number of major media outlets in the United States have already adopted that label to describe the violence in that country.

President Bush has reiterated on numerous occasions that he would not pull out U.S. troops and leave the ground open to terrorists and pro-Baathist insurgents. But again, things change.

The second school of thought -- albeit a rather Machiavellian one -- sees a unique "opportunity" to entangle the Muslim world in a fratricidal war that would keep Islamic forces occupied for years, if not decades, to come. Should in fact the U.S. choose to remove its troops from Iraq and in the process leave that country's Sunni community in harm's way, there is no doubt Saudi Arabia will intervene, as it said it would, by sending its military in great force to protect their co-religionists.

What could ensue is a protracted Shiite-Sunni war.

While this could turn out to be the worst case scenario -- the worst nightmare -- for Saudi Arabia and other countries in the region, for some policymakers it could provide the answer to what they perceive as a rising threat that three years of continued all out war by the world's best armed, best trained, best equipped and most motivated army in the world could not resolve.

Under this scenario Saudi troops, along with billions of Saudi petro-dollars, would be tied up for years to come fighting Iranian-backed insurgents in Iraq. Chances are that the fighting may very well spill over into neighboring countries such as Saudi Arabia itself, Jordan, Iran and possibly beyond. In fact chances of this happening would be very high.

The thinking among groups supporting that theory is that this would tie down fundamentalist forces on both sides for years to come. Saudi Arabia would find itself funneling large sums of money to sustain Iraq's Sunnis and their troops in that country. That would be money diverted from other Saudi projects, such as financing Islamic schools and mosques in Europe and North America.

Intra-Muslim fighting would also weaken the Shiites in Iraq as well as in neighboring Iran. As a result, a weakened Iran would be less inclined -- and certainly less financially inclined -- to pursue its nuclear program or to foment revolts beyond its borders. Or even be to preoccupied by what is going on its own front yard to continue its active support for Lebanon's Hezbollah party.

Saudi King Abdullah is worried enough by this concept that he asked for an urgent meeting with Vice President Dick Cheney, prompting the vice president two fly an 18,000-mile round-trip for a two-hour meeting with the Saudi sovereign.

For the moment Obaid says President Bush told King Abdullah that U.S. troops would stand fast in Iraq. In return The Saudi king gave his word to the American president that Saudi Arabia was not to meddle in Iraq, despite repeated requests from Sunni tribesmen for Saudi intervention. But as Obaid points out, these requests will be heeded if American troops are withdrawn and the Sunnis find themselves under fire and threat of ethnic cleansing.

Source: United Press International

Related Links
Center for Strategic and International Studies
Iraq: The first techonology war of the 21st century

More US Troops To Help Garrison Baghdad
Washington (AFP) Nov 29, 2006
The US military is moving as many as three battalions from other parts of Iraq to Baghdad to beef up security in the violence-torn capital, a US defense official said Wednesday. The official said the US troops would not come from Al-Anbar, a vast western province where US marines have been fighting a bitter, long-running Sunni insurgency.

  • Russia Slams US And NATO Intentions In Europe
  • US Dominance Of Mideast Ends
  • A Gangster State
  • Fighting An Asymmetrical Chinese War Machine

  • US,Korea Meetings Fail To Yield Results As China, Japan Discuss Defense
  • North Korea Policy Options
  • Iran Must Suspend Enrichment Before Talks With US Says Bush
  • UN Nuclear Probe Of Iran Hampered By Blind Spots

  • Pakistan Test Fires Nuclear-Capable Missile
  • Raytheon Awarded Contract For Missile Launcher Production
  • Missiles, Missiles Everywhere
  • Raytheon HARM Variant Hits Target Without Radar Guidance

  • Aegis Missile Defense Fleet Tops 80 Ships
  • India Says First Missile Intercept Test A Success
  • Israel Seeks New Technology To Shoot Down Rockets From Gaza
  • The Geopolitics Of Japan's BMD

  • DLR And EUROCONTROL Create Joint Total Airport Management Concept
  • Aviation Industry Alarmed At New EU Emission Rules
  • Technologies Evaluated For The Future National Airspace System
  • Silent Aircraft Readies For Take-Off

  • Beale AFB Gets New Global Hawk
  • QinetiQ World First Flight Demo Of Multiple UAV System
  • Boeing Demonstrates UAV Automated Aerial Refueling Capability
  • Sagem Defense Securite To Conduct Study For DGA On Future Joint Tactical UAVs

  • Saudi Worst Nightmare
  • Preventing Genocide In Iraq
  • More US Troops To Help Garrison Baghdad
  • Enter The Saudis

  • Raytheon Completes Extended-Range Test For Excalibur Block Ia-2
  • US Army To Deploy Lockheed Martin Persistent Threat Detection Systems
  • Aerial Combat: US Pilots Practiced Against MiGs
  • Boeing Signs Contract For Korea's EX Airborne Early Warning And Control Program

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement