Subscribe to our free daily newsletters
. Military Space News .




Subscribe to our free daily newsletters



The Double Peril From Iran

A bomb is bomb, but "radical Islam is a philosophy. It is far more powerful," said Rashidi.
by Claude Salhani
UPI International Editor
Washington (UPI) Apr 28, 2006
Iran's maverick President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad admitted a few weeks ago that the Islamic Republic was enriching uranium. And the world took notice. Yet far more dangerous, says a member of the Iranian opposition, Iran is also "enriching Islamic fundamentalism." And yet few are doing anything about it.

"A nuclear weapon does not have as much power as fundamental Islam," Nasser Rashidi, executive director of the National Coalition of pro-Democracy Advocates, an Iranian umbrella group opposed to the regime of the ayatollahs, told United Press International Wednesday.

A bomb is bomb, but "radical Islam is a philosophy. It is far more powerful," said Rashidi.

The Iranian dissident was speaking just as the U.S. House approved a bipartisan legislation -- The Iran Freedom Support Act -- that tightens existing sanctions on Iran, urges American divestment from companies investing in Iran's petroleum sector, and supports aiding democratic forces in Iran.

The bill was passed 397-21. Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen R-FL., and Congressman Tom Lantos, D-CA, who were instrumental in getting the bill passed, are now hoping for similar legislation from the Senate, where the issue is currently under consideration. Before the bill can become law, it needs to be approved by the Senate and signed by the president. The Bush administration, however, is not too hot on the bill.

Supporters of H.R. 282 say that the bill will help choke off funds that the Islamic republic could use to build nuclear weapons because it tightens existing sanctions against Iran, ensuring that companies are no longer able to skirt the system by investing in Iran's energy sector through off-shore subsidiaries.

However, opponents to the bill argue that sanctions will be counter-productive. They will serve to unite the Iranian people -- including those who are traditionally vehemently opposed to the ayatollahs -- and rally them around the leadership, as Iranians have consistently done in times of crisis when national pride overrides political differences.

Sanctions will only hurt the innocent and those without ample means to buy their way around the items restricted by sanctions, while sparing the leadership and those with money who will be able to circumnavigate the sanctions. Eight years of a vicious war with Iraq during which time sanctions were imposed on both protagonists, had little, if any, impact on the ayatollahs.

Trita Parsi, a spokesman with the National Iranian American Council, told UPI that voters on the NIAC Web site were 82.5 percent against sanctions being imposed, while those in favor were only 17.5 percent.

Opponents of the bill argued that it would undermine diplomatic efforts to curb the Iranian nuclear threat. Iran has already said that if attacked it will continue to build its bomb.

"This bill limits the administration's flexibility to pursue diplomacy without providing them any tools not already at their disposal," said Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore. A similar measure -- S 333 -- was introduced in the Senate in February 2005 by Rick Santorum, R-Pa., but has yet to be considered by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Foreign Relations Chairman Richard G. Lugar, R-Ind., has indicated he does not at present support additional sanctions against Iran.

One fear from opponents of sanctions is that the suffering and deaths caused by sanctions withholding food products and medicine will only create hardships for the people of Iran and will result in even greater animosity against the United States, whom they will blame for their ills.

Meanwhile, Iran continues to say that it will persevere with its uranium project, come what may. If attacked by the United States, Iran said it will strike back at American interests around the world. (Possibly starting in Iraq, where the United States currently has about 130,000 troops.) And, say the Iranians, they will rebuild their nuclear-producing facilities deeper and in greater secret.

President George W. Bush has indicated that "all options remain on the table" when it comes to dealing with Iran's nuclear ambitions. While the president did not say it in so many words, among those options would be military action to take out Iran's facilities.

Rashidi, the opposition official, believes that the mullahs governing Iran "would love to be bombed. It would give them an excuse for a war. They need an external excuse in order to put more pressure on the Iranian people," said Rashidi.

"Why is Iran building a bomb today? Iran doesn't want money, they don't want guns," says Rashidi, "they want recognition," and they believe a nuclear bomb will give them just that.

What is needed here is not more threats against the Islamic republic, which only serve to reinforce the mullahs, nor sanctions, which again, will end up working in favor of the regime. What is needed is new thinking from outside the box. The current regime thrives on crisis. The larger the crisis, the stronger they become. Sanctions will not address the "Islamist threat." Indeed, it will help strengthen the Islamic republic, as it will gain the immediate sympathy of the Arab and Muslim world.

Perhaps a more intelligent approach would be to deny them grounds for a crisis.

Source: United Press International

Related Links
-

UN Body Urged To Act Over Defiant Iran
Sofia (AFP) Apr 27, 2006
US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Thursday the UN Security Council "has to act" over Iran's failure to allay global concerns about its nuclear plans.







  • Bush And Putin Fail To Agree To Disagree
  • US Military Illiteracy Serves No Good
  • US Military Shift To The Pacific A 'Hedge' Against China
  • US Military Shift To The Pacific A 'Hedge' Against China

  • Iranian Nuclear Time Bomb Ticking Virtually Away
  • Leading Physicist And Uncle Of Israeli Nuclear Bomb Dies
  • The Double Peril From Iran
  • UN Body Urged To Act Over Defiant Iran

  • MBDA And Raytheon Offer Anti-Aircraft Missiles For Estonia
  • Raytheon Awarded Contract For Patriot Upgrades
  • India Fighter Jets To Launch Supersonic Cruise Missiles
  • US Navy Awards LockMart Contract For Mk 41 Aegis Destroyers VLS

  • The Allies America Needs For Missile Defense
  • Raytheon And ATK Demonstrate SM-3 Block IA Third Stage Rocket Motor
  • Missile Defense Boost Vehicle To Get Orbus 1a Motors
  • ABM Rocket Motor Sent To Kodiak

  • Test Pilot Crossfield Killed In Private Plane Crash
  • Aerospace Industry Slow To Embrace New MEMS Technologies
  • BAE Systems To Sell Airbus Stake, EADS Likely Buyers
  • DaimlerChrysler And Lagardere Cut Stake In EADS

  • Combat Balloon To Improve Communications
  • Second Afghanistan campaign for Canadian Forces Sperwer CU161 UAVs
  • AFRL Proves Feasibility Of Plasma Actuators
  • Northrop Grumman Opens Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Production Center In Mississippi

  • GAO Says At Eight Iraqi Provinces Are Unstable
  • Iraq Air Force Needs More Than New Coat Of Paint
  • US Military In Iraq Demands Return Of All Contractor Passports
  • US Intel CIO Defends Infomation Sharing Efforts

  • US Wants To Transform War From Massed Armies To Guerilla Warfare
  • Raytheon to Develop Hard-Kill Active Protection System for FCS Vehicles
  • ATK Ignition Safety Device Delivers First For Guided Projectiles
  • DRS Receives $26M US Army Contract For Long Range Advanced Surveillance Systems

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement