Military Space News  
Get Our Free Newsletters Via Email
  
Search All Our Sites - Powered By Bing
US Ponders Whether To Arm And Support Local Afghan Militia Forces

In the period immediately after the ouster of the Taliban government at the end of 2001, Dobbins said, the United States and its allies attempted to limit their military commitment by restricting peacekeeping troops to Kabul and using "tribal militias and warlords" to maintain security in the rest of the country. "Over time it was found that that was not an adequate policy," said Dobbins.
by Shaun Waterman
Washington (UPI) Sep 5, 2008
Experts are warning that it might prove counterproductive to extend to Afghanistan the U.S. strategy of forming and paying tribal militias to improve security -- though it has been credited with great successes in Iraq.

The U.S. military in Afghanistan denied such a move was being considered by senior officials, but the possibility is being discussed by officers on the ground.

"People are talking about it," said Vickram Singh, an expert with the centrist Center for a New American Security who returned recently from Afghanistan and told United Press International the idea of extending the strategy there had come up in briefings from the U.S. military.

He said detailed discussions about possibly supplying weapons and money were taking place "at an operational and tactical level -- identifying people who we (coalition military forces) could work with."

A spokesman for the U.S. military in Afghanistan denied that extending the strategy of arming and paying tribal militias was on the table. "We are not considering that," said Capt. Christian Patterson.

But it is being advocated, at least by some now outside the government.

Recently retired U.S. Army counterinsurgency expert Col. John Nagl welcomed the idea, saying that "buying off your enemies is 真 a time-honored tactic in counterinsurgency with a proven track record of success."

"Over time, you try to incorporate those people into the government security organizations," Nagl added. "I absolutely think that there are tribal organizations in Afghanistan who could be incorporated. 真 It would be a way to rapidly increase the size of (the Afghan National Police and National Army) with cohesive units."

But as UPI reported last month, the strategy of forming and paying Sunni tribal militias -- known variously as Awakening Councils or the Sons of Iraq -- to maintain security has run into trouble in Iraq, where efforts to integrate them into the nation's security forces have been stymied by the sectarian concerns of the Shiite-led government in Baghdad.

And several Afghanistan experts with whom UPI spoke said they had grave doubts about expanding the practice there, warning it would risk the fragile gains of the state-building strategy that the international community has been pursuing.

"At best, it would be a tactical gain, but also an immense strategic loss," said Ali Jalali, a former Afghan interior minister and now a visiting professor at the National Defense University, noting that by fragmenting power and undermining the authority of the central government, the strategy in the long run could actually worsen the instability it sought to ameliorate.

He called this "effort to gain peace through manipulating tribal dynamics" a "colonial approach."

Levels of corruption and instability were already much too high in the volatile border regions of the country, said retired Marine Col. Daniel Curfiss, also a professor at the National Defense University.

"My concern is, it would be throwing kindling on this (fire) 真 to pay people who are already unwilling to relinquish power," he said.

"There are precedents, and the precedents are not terribly hopeful," said former U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan James Dobbins, now at the Center for Strategic and International Studies and author of a recent study of state-building efforts in the war-ravaged country.

In the period immediately after the ouster of the Taliban government at the end of 2001, Dobbins said, the United States and its allies attempted to limit their military commitment by restricting peacekeeping troops to Kabul and using "tribal militias and warlords" to maintain security in the rest of the country.

"Over time it was found that that was not an adequate policy," said Dobbins.

Jalali said continuing efforts by coalition nations to work directly with tribal and other local leaders had been "one of the problems when I was interior minister" from 2003 to 2005. "They gave them weapons, money and vehicles."

In 2006, he said, the Afghan government of President Hamid Karzai tried itself to use tribally based militias -- with unhappy results.

Most of the 12,000 members of the militias, formally titled the Afghan National Auxiliary Police, "either deserted with their arms and equipment or were more or less forced to join the insurgents," he said, adding that the force was scheduled to be finally phased out of existence by the end of the current year.

He also pointed out that years of war and insurgency in the tribal areas of Afghanistan had physically decimated the tribal leadership and eroded their influence. "Over the past 30 years, the influence of the traditional leaders has waned," he said, adding that it was warlords and extremists who had replaced them.

Even those who think the idea is worth considering are keen to stress the differences between the two theaters.

The political dynamic is different in Afghanistan, said Singh, because there, you would not be buying off enemies, but arming your friends.

"The people that we'd start working with are people that already support the government," he said. "They are aware of what's happening in Iraq and they are saying, 'You should do it here.'"

Many local leaders were "all too eager to get in the game," Jalali said.

He said he had met a delegation of two dozen tribal elders who had come to town to petition the government about security in their remote border region. They were saying, in effect, "If you can't take care of the border, give us the weapons and we'll do it," he said.

Jalali said a strategy of working through local militias was putting the cart before the horse. "The tribes will only stand up (against the extremists) if they see that the government had authority in their areas 真 that is not the case today."

The priority should be building the capacity of the central government, Jalali said. "Capacity-building is the central challenge in Afghanistan today."

Singh said that was one of his concerns about the proposal, too.

"No one is thinking at the strategic level 真 if this is the right answer," he said, adding there was "no analysis by the coalition of how this would play out."

"There's a lot of downside," he concluded.

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
News From Across The Stans


More troops needed in Afghanistan: US commander
Washington (AFP) Sept 5, 2008
A top US commander said Friday he needs more troops to counter growing insurgent violence in Afghanistan amid signs the rebels are preparing for a winter campaign for the first time.

.




.




Memory Foam Mattress Review

Newsletters :: SpaceDaily Express :: SpaceWar Express :: TerraDaily Express :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: China News
  • Japan Sees Opportunity For New Asian Renaissance
  • Japan defence report warns on Russia
  • China suggests UN role in solving Georgia crisis
  • Russia-NATO: Return Of The Great Game

  • Tehran plays down French warning of Israeli attack
  • US may scrap Russia nuclear cooperation next week: official
  • Iran nuclear program needs political, not military response: Peres
  • India hails end to nuclear pariah status

  • Diehl Signs Contract With SENER For IRIS-T Surface-to-Air Missile
  • Lockheed Martin Receives Contract For Guided MLRS Unitary Rockets
  • Taiwan won't deploy longer-range missiles: report
  • Taiwan to mass-produce anti-ship missiles: report

  • Anti Missile Showdown Building Between East And West
  • Outside View: BMD blowback -- Part Two
  • Outside View: BMD blowback -- Part One
  • Outside View: BMD dilemmas -- Part Two

  • Chinese airlines fly into headwinds in Olympic year
  • The M2-F1 - An Aircraft Without Wings
  • China's Tianjin building runway for Airbus test flights: report
  • NASA evaluates new wing sensor

  • Robotic helicopters teach themselves
  • Industrial 6-Rotor Unmanned Helicopter Provides HighDef Video And Imaging
  • LockMart Demos Airspace Deconfliction Of Multiple UAVs
  • Reaper Drops Laser-Guided Bomb On Anti-Iraqi Forces

  • Cache By Cache Baghdad Being Disarmed By US Forces
  • Bush likely to unveil Iraq troop decision next week
  • The Rules Of Contract Based Warfare
  • Bush mulling Iraq troop recommendations

  • The Power Of Armour In The Early 21st Century
  • ATK Awarded Comtract To Develop Multi-Stage Supersonic Target
  • Spain's defence minister promises female friendly army uniform
  • Defense Focus: Tanks still rock -- Part One

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement