| . | ![]() |
. |
|
by Christen Mccurdy Washington DC (UPI) Jul 28, 2020
The new coronavirus relief package proposed in the U.S. Senate includes $29 billion for the Department of Defense, including at least $7 billion for weapons programs and $11 billion to reimburse defense contractors for coronavirus-related expenses. Defense contractors lobbied for the reimbursement funding, saying the Department of Defense would otherwise be forced to tap into modernization and readiness accounts. The Senate bill was unveiled Monday and includes another stimulus payment for Americans and a cut to unemployment benefits. The bill also includes a new round of funding for the Paycheck Protection Program, more money for emergency business loans and a reduced extension of emergency federal unemployment benefits. Its release follows weeks of negotiation between the White House and congressional Republicans over the bill's price tag. Now Republicans and Democrats will begin formal negotiations over the bill's particulars. Republicans have argued the bill's defense spending is essential for the economy and for national security but Democrats have criticized the bill on multiple fronts. Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) released a statement Monday saying the bill is inadequate to support health and safety and stabilize the U.S. economy during the pandemic. The bill, Leahy said, "contains billions of dollars for programs unrelated to the coronavirus, including over $8 billion for what appears to be a wish-list from the Department of Defense for manufacturing of planes, ships, and other weapons systems, as well as $1.75 billion to build a new FBI Headquarters." "What does this have to do with the immediate crisis?" Leahy wrote. "The bill provides nothing to address the long lines at foodbanks and shortchanges education and childcare, but we can shore up the defense industry? I am at a loss for words." On Tuesday Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.), chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, issued a statement criticizing the DoD line items. "While it is true that COVID-19 poses a real and credible threat to our national security, you don't have to be doctor or a four-star general to understand that spending billions on new helicopters, combat vehicles, and fighter jets is not the solution to this complex problem," Smith wrote. "It is also true that COVID-19 has had a disproportionate impact on small manufacturers who play a crucial role in our industrial base," Smith wrote. "We need to implement smart policies that actually support these small manufacturers and maintains the stability of our supply chain -- Leader McConnell's procurement wish list is not the solution." The legislation left out some items on the White House's wish list, including a payroll tax cut President Donald Trump has demanded. It also restores hundreds of millions of dollars in defense spending that the Trump administration had redirected to pay for construction of a wall along the southern border of the United States. The Trump administration's use of Pentagon funds for border wall construction has been a subject of dispute between the White House and Congress. At the end of June a federal appeals court ruled that the Trump administration doesn't have the authority to divert $2.5 billion in military funds to carry out construction of the border wall. Earlier this month House Democrats released a draft of the Homeland Security funding bill designed to block funds for the border wall. It was reviewed by the House Appropriations Committee last week but has not passed.
US Senate passes $740.5 bn defense bill that would rename bases Washington (AFP) July 23, 2020 The US Senate on Thursday passed a $740.5 billion bill setting Pentagon priorities, but which President Trump has threatened to veto over a provision that removes Confederate names from military bases. The Senate's version of the National Defense Authorization Act for critical defense spending passed by a vote of 86 to 14, a veto-proof result that saw several Republicans defy the president and support the base-renaming measure. The House of Representatives approved its own version of the bill, w ... read more
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |