 Canada imposes carbon tax on four provinces with no climate plans Ottawa (AFP) April 1, 2019 - Canada's federal government on Monday made good on an ultimatum to impose a carbon tax on four provinces that haven't fallen in line with its emissions reduction strategy. A starting levy of Can$20 (US$15) per tonne of pollution imposed on Manitoba, New Brunswick, Ontario and Saskatchewan -- all led by Conservatives -- will add about 4.4 cents to the price of a liter of gasoline, and drive up other energy costs too. Over the coming years it is scheduled to increase incrementally to Can$50. Liberal Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, however, pledged to refund most of monies directly to taxpayers, with those who aggressively cut their emissions reaping the largest rebates. Six other provinces are exempt because each has come up with their own carbon tax or cap and trade system to help Canada meet its Paris Agreement target of reducing CO2 emissions by 30 percent from 2005 levels by 2030. "Putting a price on pollution is the most affordable and effective way to cut pollution," Environment Minister Catherine McKenna said on Twitter, enlisting support from former California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. "Strange how today's Conservatives, including (Andrew) Scheer and (Doug) Ford, oppose this practical, affordable, market-based solution," she said. Saskatchewan has gone to court to fight the levy, while Ontario's Premier Doug Ford has railed against it daily over the past two weeks, saying it is a jobs-killer and could trigger a recession -- claims disputed by economists. "It will make everything more expensive," Ford said in an online video showing him filling up a car at a gas station. His government, after it was elected last June, pulled Ontario out of a California-led cap and trade system that would have met the federal standard. Speaking to reporters, Conservative opposition leader Andrew Scheer said Canadians "can't afford" the carbon tax, and vowed to repeal it if his party is elected next October. He declined, however, to present an alternate plan to meet Canada's international climate obligations until the election.
|
Taxes on products considered polluting are struggling to gain ground in the European Union despite backing from Brussels, in the face of strong opposition from movements like France's "Yellow Vests".
In 2011 the European Commission envisaged that by "2020 a major shift from taxation of labour towards environmental taxation... will lead to a substantial increase in the share of environmental taxes in public revenues".
So far this has not come to pass. Since then the share of environmental tax revenues in the EU, which stood at 6.18 percent, has fallen almost every year.
Nonetheless, eco-taxes in 2017 generated around 369 billion euros (some $303 billion).
- Leaders and laggards -
Latvia leads the bloc in implementing eco-taxes, making up some 11.11 percent of its fiscal revenue in 2017, according to data from EU statistics authority Eurostat.
Slovenia and Greece also top the list, generating respectively 10.13 percent and 9.5 percent of their revenue from eco-taxes, well above the EU country average of 5.97 percent.
By contrast, Luxembourg brings in the least revenue from eco-taxes with 4.25 percent, while Germany (4.46 percent), Belgium (4.74 percent), France (4.77 percent) and Sweden (4.8 percent) do not fare much better.
- Existing eco-taxes -
Eco-taxes in Germany are based on reforms passed in 1999-2000. Germans now pay a tax on electricity of 6.41 cents per kilowatt hour that directly finances renewable energy infrastructure.
In Hungary, meanwhile, an eco-tax is automatically charged through VAT on products that generate waste such as plastic bags, batteries, leaflets and packaging.
Bulgaria also charges eco-taxes on vehicle registration, ranging from 64 euros to 158 euros depending on the age of the car. This does not apply to electric cars.
Greeks meanwhile have paid for plastic bags in supermarkets since January in a well-received measure, with experts noting a "significant" reduction in the number of bags used. The government says the revenue collected will be used in the recycling sector.
Energy in Latvia is heavily taxed: up to 509 euros per 1,000 litres for fuel oil, while coal is so highly taxed that it is virtually impossible to open a coal power plant. Tax on natural gas, however, is lower.
- Backlash and backtracking -
The French "yellow vest" protests are the latest expression of opposition to eco-taxing, sparked by a proposed fuel tax hike that led to widespread demonstrations and road blockages in late 2018.
After three weeks of protests, the government scrapped the fuel tax set to be introduced in January 2019, but protests have continued.
In Bulgaria, where eco-taxes have generally been received without opposition, an attempt at raising annual taxes on vehicles more than 10 years old sparked debate and the government was forced to backtrack, deciding instead to reduce taxes on new vehicles.
Protests broke out in Slovenia -- a leader in eco-taxes -- in 2014, over a rise in C02 emissions taxes. The government toned down the measure to avoid hitting major polluters too hard.
In Estonia, the shale oil industry managed to obtain a reduction in taxes for a few years.
And in Sweden, a carbon tax was a central issue in the 2018 legislative elections, in which the far-right Swedish Democrats came third in polls after basing part of its campaign on reducing the tax, notably for farmers following a drought.
Canada failing in climate change fight: watchdog
Ottawa (AFP) April 2, 2019 -
Canada is doing too little to combat climate change, a parliamentary report warned Tuesday, a day after government scientists warned the country was warming at twice the global rate.
The rebuke came as Canada's independent environment auditor released a new report on government efforts to end fossil fuel subsidies, and as climate change shapes up as a divisive issue in elections seven months from now.
"For decades, successive federal governments have failed to reach their targets for reducing greenhouse-gas emissions, and the government is not ready to adapt to a changing climate," wrote environment commissioner Julie Gelfand.
"This must change."
A report by Environment and Climate Change Canada, details of which were released on Monday, showed that average temperatures in Canada have risen by 1.7 degrees Celsius (3.1 degrees Fahrenheit) since 1948, about double the global average of 0.8 degrees Celsius.
In northern Canada, approaching the Arctic Circle, temperatures rose on average by 2.3 degrees Celsius over the same period.
Canada has pledged to meet a Paris Agreement target of reducing CO2 emissions by 30 percent from 2005 levels by 2030.
On Monday, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau -- who has declared climate action a top priority -- slapped a carbon tax on four provinces that had not fallen in line with his emissions reduction strategy.
But the government's overall efforts have been panned by the environment auditor, and in December the environment ministry acknowledged a best case scenario of a 19 percent emissions cut.
In her latest report, Gelfand outlined a badly defined process, a lack of good data and little progress in making decisions to meet Canada's G20 commitment to eliminate inefficient fossil fuel subsidies by 2025.
She also slammed the government for looking only at the economic impact of fossil fuel subsidies, without considering potential social and environmental damage.
For fossil fuel producers, subsidies can take the form of tax breaks, cheap loans, protection from competitors, or favorable trade restrictions.
For consumers, they generally result in below-market prices for oil, gas or electricity.
The intergovernmental International Energy Agency (IEA) last year estimated the global value of fossil fuel consumption subsidies in 2016 at about US$260 billion, down from US$310 billion the year before.
Electricity and oil each accounted for just over US$100 billion, with natural gas topping US$50 billion. Coal subsidies were only about US$2 billion.
Coal, natural gas, and oil extraction contribute nine percent of Canada's gross domestic product (GDP). Together with transportation, the sector produces half of Canada's greenhouse gas emissions.
Environmental groups said the report shows Ottawa "continuing to stall" while seeking to justify "irresponsible handouts to the oil and gas industry."
Related Links
Climate Science News - Modeling, Mitigation Adaptation
|
|
Tweet |
|
|
|
del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Google
