. Military Space News .
Pentagon agency at source of harsh interrogation techniques: probe


CIA interrogations provided 'valuable' info: intel chief
The CIA's harsh interrogations of Al-Qaeda detainees provided "valuable" information but are not needed to keep America safe, the US intelligence chief said Wednesday. Retired admiral Dennis Blair's comment followed assertions by former vice president Dick Cheney and former CIA director Michael Hayden that intelligence gained through the interrogations had saved American lives. "The information gained from these techniques was valuable in some instances, but there is no way of knowing whether the same information could have been obtained through other means," Blair said in a statement. Blair said he strongly supported President Barack Obama's decision to ban the techniques, which include waterboarding, a former of near drowning widely denounced as torture. "We do not need these techniques to keep America safe," he said. A Senate investigation released Wednesday found that the harsh interrogation techniques were drawn from a military program to train captured troops to resist coercive interrogations. Those techniques were modeled in part on methods used by China to extract false confessions from captured US troops during the Korean war. "The bottom line is these techniques have hurt our image around the world, the damage they have done to our interests far outweighed whatever benefit they gave us and they are not essential to our national security," Blair said. At the same time, he said CIA officials should not be prosecuted for carry out "legal orders." Obama on Tuesday, however, refused to rule out prosecutions of officials who formulated the coercive interrogation regime. In an interview with Fox television this week, Cheney insisted that the interrogations "worked." "It's been enormously valuable in terms of saving lives, preventing another mass casualty attack against the United States," he said. Cheney said he had asked the CIA to declassify memos that "lay out what we learned through the interrogation process and what the consequences were for the country."

CIA first sought waterboarding powers in May 2002
The CIA first requested in May 2002 to be allowed to question terrorism suspects with a near-drowning technique known as waterboarding, according to a document made public on Wednesday. And the agency got the green light to use the tactic, which has widely been judged to be torture, on July 26, 2002, the Senate Intelligence Committee said in a detailed timeline of controversial "war on terrorism" interrogations. The CIA had asked to be able to waterboard Abu Zubaydah, a Saudi-born Palestinian whose real name is Zayn Al Abidin Muhammad Husayn, fearing he was withholding information about "imminent" terrorist attacks, the panel said. The committee did not wade into the growing controversy over whether so-called "enhanced interrogation" methods applied to Zubaydah -- who was waterboarded 83 times in August 2002 -- yielded solid information. US forces captured Zubaydah in a late March 2002 firefight, tended to his serious injuries, and began to question him, according to the timeline. The agency asked senior officials in Washington, including then-national security adviser Condoleezza Rice, in mid-May 2002 to discuss the possibility of using rougher interrogation methods, including waterboarding. The CIA made the request because it "believed that Abu Zubaydah was withholding imminent threat information during the initial interrogation sessions." The US Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel orally advised the CIA on July 26, 2002, "that the use of waterboarding was lawful," a finding it put in writing on August 1, 2002, the timeline said.
by Staff Writers
Washington (AFP) April 22, 2009
A little known Pentagon agency that trained US troops to resist torture promoted the use of some of the same interrogation techniques on Al-Qaeda, which were aired and quickly authorized at high levels of the US government, a Senate investigation has found.

Warnings by military lawyers about both the legality and the effectiveness of techniques that were modeled on methods used by China to extract false confessions from US prisoners in the Korean War were ignored, the report found.

Released Wednesday, the investigation traced the interrogation techniques used at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba and that later spread to Afghanistan and Iraq to the Pentagon's Joint Personnel Recovery Agency (JPRA).

The agency oversees the military's Survival Evasion Resistance and Escape (SERE) training, which prepares captured military personnel to withstand interrogations that do not abide by the Geneva Conventions.

The techniques used at SERE schools were strikingly similar to those that later surfaced at Abu Ghraib and elsewhere: nudity, stress positions, hoods, treatment like animals, sleep disruption, loud music and flashing lights, and exposure to extreme temperatures.

At the US Navy's SERE schools they also included waterboarding, the near drowning technique used 266 times by the CIA in its interrogations of two top Al-Qaeda detainees.

"Typically, those who play the part of interrogators in SERE school neither are trained interrogators nor are they qualified to be," the report said. "Their job is to train our personnel to resist providing reliable information to our enemies."

But in the wake of the September 11 attacks, that was turned on its head by senior officials at the agency eager to apply SERE methods to interrogations of Al-Qaeda prisoners, and by top Pentagon civilians looking for advice.

The agency's senior SERE psychologist, Bruce Jessen, circulated a draft plan on April 16, 2002 for exploiting detainees for intelligence to the agency's commander and other senior agency officials.

It proposed the creation of a secret "exploitation facility" that would be off limits to outsiders like the International Committee of the Red Cross or the press, the report said.

"The plan also described the fundamentals," the report said. "'Exploitation of select Al-Qaeda detainees.'"

In the spring of 2002, the CIA sought approval for interrogations of high-level Al-Qaeda detainees, which led to White House briefings by CIA director George Tenet and a National Security Council review that included attorney general John Ashcroft and defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld.

By June, JPRA had begun assisting in training officers from "another government agency," a common euphemism for the CIA, the report said.

Jessen was said to have suggested "exploitation strategies" to one officer sent to interrogate a high-level Al-Qaeda operative.

At a two day training session July 1-2 2002, JPRA personnel provided instruction on waterboarding, the report said.

Weeks later, the Pentagon's deputy general counsel for intelligence, Richard Shiffrin, asked the agency for information on SERE techniques at the prompting of the Pentagon's general counsel, Jim Haynes.

Shiffrin "confirmed that a purpose of the request was to 'reverse engineer' the techniques," the report said.

On August 1, 2002, the Justice Department issued two now famous legal opinions approving waterboarding and re-defining torture as "equivalent in intensity to the pain accompanying serious physical injury, such as organ failure, impairment of bodily function, or even death."

Top lawyers representing the Pentagon, the CIA and vice president Dick Cheney traveled to Guantanamo on September 25, 2002, and a week later two behavioral scientists at the Cuban "war on terror" prison proposed new interrogation techniques.

One told Senate investigators there was "increasing pressure to get 'tougher' with detainee interrogations."

But when Major General Michael Dunlavey, the task force commander in Guantanamo, requested authority to use aggressive interrogation techniques on October 11, 2002, warning flags quickly went up.

The air force raised "serious concerns" about the legality of many of the techniques; the legal adviser to criminal investigation unit at Guantanamo warned that service members could be exposed to prosecution; an army lawyer said some techniques crossed "the line of 'humane' treatment;" the Marine Corps said they "arguably violate federal law;" and the Navy called for a more detailed review.

But General Richard Myers, then the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, stepped in to cut short a legal review by the Joint Staff, telling his legal counsel that Haynes wanted it stopped.

On November 27, 2002, Haynes recommended approval of the all but three of 18 special techniques sought by the Guantanamo commander.

Rumsfeld signed it on December 2, 2002, adding a note on stress positions: "I stand for 8-10 hours a day. Why is standing limited to four hours?"

Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
The latest in Military Technology for the 21st century at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


PDR Validates Maturity Of Future Combat Systems Common Controller
St. Louis MO (SPX) Apr 20, 2009
Boeing and Science Applications International have announced that the Future Combat Systems' Common Controller has successfully completed its preliminary design review (PDR). This evaluation allows the Common Controller to begin testing with the Army later this year.







  • The Future Of NATO Part Five
  • Australia must boost military to deal with China rise: think tank
  • NATO Bloated And Weakened From Expansion Part Two
  • Future Of NATO Will Be Determined In Afghanistan Part Six

  • BMD Watch: S-400s for Belarus Part Three
  • Iran offers 'constructive' nuclear talks amid US warning
  • NKorea renews threat to 'bolster nuclear deterrent'
  • Russian foreign minister to visit North Korea: ministry

  • Japan products found on NKorea missile kit vessel: report
  • USAF Awards Raytheon Contract For Laser-Guided Maverick Missile
  • Raytheon Standard Missile-2 Destroys Target
  • Indian tests cruise missile: official

  • Israel wants to buy US rocket intercept system
  • BMD Strategies: Multilayered Ballistic Missile Defense Systems Part 2 and 3
  • Russia accuses US on missile shield
  • Seeking New BMD Strategies Part One

  • Air China says yet to receive state aid despite request
  • As revenue drops, Cathay asks staff to take leave
  • Virgin to report greenhouse gases to Climate Registry
  • China Eastern Airlines reports huge loss in 2008

  • Raven UAS Achieves 30-Hour Persistent Surveillance
  • Boeing Demonstrates Command And Control Of ScanEagle From Wedgetail
  • Russia Defense Watch: UAVs from Israel
  • Russia buys unmanned drones from Israel: report

  • Analysis: Dissident city in Iraq in danger
  • US Senate confirms Hill as Iraq ambassador
  • Twitter boss wants more 'tweets' in Iraq
  • US must stay engaged in Iraq despite Afghanistan: analysts

  • Pentagon agency at source of harsh interrogation techniques: probe
  • PDR Validates Maturity Of Future Combat Systems Common Controller
  • Land Rover Launches Versatile New Discovery Armoured
  • Boeing Awarded US Navy Contract to Develop Free Electron Laser

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement