| . | ![]() |
. |
|
by Ed Adamczyk Washington DC (UPI) Oct 21, 2020
Two senators said Wednesday they have called for a delay in implementing the U.S. Army's Combat Fitness Test, citing a possible detriment to creating a diverse force. A letter signed by Sen. Kristin Gillibrand, D-N.Y., and Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., sent a letter to the chairman and ranking members of the House and Senate Armed Services Committees warning that rollout of the revised test was premature and deserved additional study. "Significant concerns have been raised regarding the data used to develop the test, initial test scores, and logistical issues," the senators wrote. "The ACFT will determine the career path and success of all soldiers currently serving, yet many information gaps and unknowns remain." It suggested that the ACFT could adversely impact soldiers' professional prospects, upset recruitment efforts and disproportionally affect women in the Army, and noted that few women were included in early testing groups. "In 2019, the Army identified the six events of the ACFT and began conducting field tests within 63 battalions across the organization," the senators wrote. "Preliminary data was leaked showing an overall failure rate of 84 percent for females and 30 percent for males within these battalions." The test is an attempt by the Army to establish effective but gender-neutral standards for soldiers' fitness and readiness, and replaces Army previous fitness tests which clearly displayed a bias but were less rigorous. Six events are involved in the new test, including a dead lift, weighted ball throw and a "leg tuck," in which soldiers lift themselves up from a pullup bar using their arm, core and leg muscles. The leg tuck is largely responsible for the 65 percent failure rate for women and the 10 percent failure rate for men. The letter from Gillibrand and Blumenthal cited a University of Iowa study that showing that the removal of the leg-tuck could significantly improve success rates. The letter said the leg tuck is "the same event which has no proven predictive value to military occupation." It also noted that the previously used Army Physical Fitness Test required no equipment other than a stopwatch, while "the ACFT requires approximately $3,000 worth of equipment to put one individual through the test." Gillibrand and Blumenthal added that the test is irrelevant, and possibly damaging, to the careers of Army lawyers, cybersecurity specialists and other non-combat enlistees. The senators recommend that the 2021 National Defense Authorization Act include a provision allowing Congress to delay use of the ACFT until it is independently reviewed.
U.S. Army formally reactivates storied V Corps Washington DC (UPI) Oct 16, 2020 The U.S. Army reactivated its famed Fifth Corps, or V Corps, on Friday in an effort to bring more command and control support to its mission in Europe. Although the ceremonial aspects of the corps' return took place during a ceremony Friday at its Fort Knox, Ky., headquarters, V Corps has had a forward command presence in Poznan, Poland, since early September. It's mission has focused on conducting operational planning, as well as mission command and oversight of the rotational forces in ... read more
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |