| . | ![]() |
. |
London, UK (SPX) Mar 10, 2011 The United Kingdom has clinched the fourth spot on the list of the top military spenders with an expenditure of $58.30 billion in 2009, which translates to 3.8 per cent of the global share. As a North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) member, the United Kingdom is expected to channel at least 2 per cent of its gross domestic product towards defence, making it a viable market for stakeholders in the land defence market. New analysis from Frost and Sullivan, Revenue Opportunities and Stakeholder Mapping in the United Kingdom Land Defence Market, finds that the U.K. land defence market generated $834 million in 2010 and is expected to reach $1.50 billion in 2017. The UK's crucial role in the major global conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan has exposed the gap between its cold war era capabilities and its readiness to counter contemporary threats. The UK land defence domain witnessed significant procurements as result of urgent operations requirements (UOR). While the Government has acknowledged the need to modernize fleets and has expressed interest in ramping up its arsenal, the current economic situation and budget deficits have delayed most of the planned modernisation programs. "As a conscious measure to avoid the drawbacks of downsizing, the armed forces are being equipped with advanced equipment," says Frost and Sullivan Research Analyst Mahendran Arjunraja. "The increasing involvement in high-intensity operations and lessons learned from the recent conflicts would push the country to deploy advanced and more efficient equipment." Furthermore, the Government has commissioned a Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDSR), 12 years after the last one, to determine the future capabilities and size of the country's land defence forces. While military downsizing is apparent in all domains of the defence forces, the army is expected to be the least affected due to the current operational commitments, while the navy and air force will keenly feel the impact of the SDSR. The gradual shift from UOR to planned modernisation programs in the land defence domain is expected to boost the market from 2013. Hence, defence companies catering to UOR at present should slowly start gravitating towards the upcoming modernization programs and identify possible market opportunities. In future, the number of ground formations in the U.K. army is expected to nosedive. This will invariably have significant repercussions on the procurement volumes. In such a scenario, the domestic defence companies will not be able to benefit from economies of scale, unless they supplement their order book with foreign sales or innovate in-house. Defence companies must ensure low-cost offerings since absolute cost of equipment will be one of the primary purchase factors. "Absolute cost, sustainability and life time support are the future procurement priorities of the Ministry of Defence (MoD)," notes Mahendran Arjunraja. "Capabilities such as autonomous systems, sensors, cyber and space are likely to be the focus of future investments."
Share This Article With Planet Earth
Related Links Frost and Sullivan The Military Industrial Complex at SpaceWar.com Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com
Israel's top arms firm eyes privatizationTel Aviv, Israel (UPI) Mar 7, 2011 Israel Aerospace Industries, state-owned flagship of the Jewish state's vaunted high-tech defense industry, is moving toward privatization amid an emerging shake-up of the defense sector. This includes a possible merger of IAI and two other state-owned companies, Rafael Advanced Defense Systems and the limping Israel Military Industries. The Economist reports that IAI Chairman Ya ... read more |
|
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2010 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |