require_once("mobile_device_detect.php"); mobile_device_detect(true,false,true,true,true,true,true,"../m/reports/Unease_and_stoicism_on_Finlands_Russian_border_999.html",false); ?> include"/home2/www/vhosts/spacedaily.com/spxphp/spxphp-head-it.php" ?> include"/home2/www/vhosts/spacewar.com/swxphp/swxphp-start.php" ?>
Unease and stoicism on Finland's Russian border![]() UK pushes against Russia in northern European summit London (AFP) March 12, 2022 - British Prime Minister Boris Johnson will next week host a summit with leaders from Nordic countries and Russia's Baltic neighbours, as Norway hosts one of NATO's biggest military exercises since the Cold War. "Exercise Cold Response" will see more than 30,000 troops from 27 nations training in sub-zero temperatures from Monday. In a statement Saturday, Downing Street said in parallel to the drills, Johnson would convene leaders from the Joint Expeditionary Force, a coalition of 10 states focused on security in northern Europe. After dinner on Monday at his country retreat of Chequers, the prime minister will convene a summit in London of the JEF countries on Tuesday, it said. "European security has been shaken by the attack of Russia on Ukraine, and alongside our partners, we will take action to ensure we emerge stronger and more united than before," Johnson said. "Ensuring we are resilient to (Vladimir) Putin's threats needs to go beyond our military footing -- together alongside our North and Baltic Sea partners we must ensure we are insulated from Russia's interference and impact on our energy supplies, economy and values." The JEF, set up in 2012, is made up of NATO members Britain, Denmark, Estonia, Iceland, Latvia, Lithuania, the Netherlands and Norway, plus non-members Finland and Sweden. The group has been staging its own UK-led military exercise in the Baltic Sea, to demonstrate JEF nations' "freedom of movement" in the strategic zone adjacent to Russia. At this week's summit, the JEF leaders are expected to agree to an "enhanced programme" of exercises in the Arctic, North Atlantic and Baltic Sea, the Downing Street statement said.
|
In her wooden, snow-covered house 20 minutes from Russia, Maija Poyhia wears a traditional blue headscarf that her mother carried with her when fleeing the Soviet invasion of Finland during World War II.
In Finland, Russia's assault on Ukraine has stirred up some painful associations with the 1939 Winter War, when Red Army troops attacked the Nordic country across their shared border, which now runs to 1,340 kilometres (830 miles).
As in Ukraine, the smaller Finnish army back then put up strong resistance and inflicted heavy losses on the Soviets.
But Finland ended up ceding a huge stretch of its eastern Karelia province, driving almost half a million Finns -- 12 percent of the entire population -- from their homes.
"My dad's childhood home is still on the Finnish side," Poyhia tells AFP, although her mother's family farm is now in Russia. "But back then, no one really understood how the border went."
A second war against the USSR followed, from 1941 to 1944, this time with Finland in a de facto alliance with Nazi Germany.
In spite of the area's history, Poyhia and her husband, Seppo Laaksovirta, "are not scared at all" of living so close to the Russian border, and the threat of another invasion feels distant.
"I don't know anyone around here who's been saying we need to be on our toes," Laaksovirta says.
Russia's shock invasion of Ukraine on February 24 led to a spike in Finnish support for joining NATO as a defence against possible aggression from the east, with polls showing record levels in favour of membership.
Laaksovirta supports joining the military alliance, a move he believes "would be of more use than harm."
"Nowadays, we've got arms from America and the West here," he adds, "rather than what we had in the 1960s, which was from Russia."
- Strong cross-border ties -
In the 80 years since the Soviet invasion, Finns along the border have re-developed strong cultural and economic ties with their eastern neighbours.
"The younger generations have learned to live, and want to live, in a Western, international society," says Anna Helminen, city council chair in Imatra, a town just five kilometres (three miles) from the border.
A thousand of Imatra's 26,000 residents are Russian citizens, and the town "was founded on Russian purchasing power," Helminen tells AFP.
Imatra's businesses had been desperate for Russian tourists to begin visiting the shops, hotels and spas again as the Covid pandemic waned.
"Now, of course, the same situation will continue," Helminen says.
Plans for a rail link to St Petersburg and many other cross-border projects "all disappeared overnight" after the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
"Daily contact and future projects have been stopped," Helminen says.
"Our leaders and officials have said there's no immediate threat to Finland and we want to believe that and see the future positively," Helminen says.
"But, of course, this situation leaves its mark, including on interactions between people."
- 'Like a rat in a trap' -
Some Russian community groups have recently reported increased anti-Russian sentiment in Finland, but mainly on social media.
Anastasia Petrishina, who has lived and worked close to Imatra for 10 years, says she has not received any negative reactions from Finns since the war started.
Her Finnish friends "understand that Russia as a state is not the same as the Russian people," the pharmaceutical quality control manager tells AFP.
"But I can't be 100 percent sure how it's going to be in the future, especially for people who don't know me personally."
The mother of two says the outbreak of war has made her consider, "What does it mean being a Russian person in Finland, in the EU, and staying outside Russia?"
She has shelved plans to travel to her native St Petersburg, even though her elder daughter, in her 20s, is there.
"I don't want to be like a rat in a trap there," unable to return to Finland, Petrishina says.
Draconian new Russian laws threatening prison for anyone criticising the Kremlin mean Petrishina has only had minimal conversations with her relatives back home about the war in Ukraine.
"I'm not ready to discuss these matters, because I prefer to keep them in safety."
Petrishina says she is "an optimistic person in principle," and believes things will get better.
"But the question is, how much time does it take?"
Related Links
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com
|
|
Tweet |
|
|
|