Military Space News  





. Air Support Insanity

Residents of Baghdad's notorious Sadr City district inspect the scene of devastation in a marketplace hit by an airstrike in May this year. US and Iraqi forces captured an Iraqi militant accused of "acting as a proxy for an Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps officer" after a fierce gunbattle, the US military said. The joint snatch squad called in an air strike after coming under fire during a raid on the hideout of an alleged weapons smuggling gang in the the Shiite militia bastion in east Baghdad. Photo courtesy AFP.
by William S. Lind
for Center for Cultural Conservatism
Washington (UPI) June 15, 2007
Looking idly at the front page of last Wednesday's Washington Post Express as I rode the Metro to work, I received a shock. It showed a railroad station in Iraq, recently destroyed by an American air strike. So now we are bombing the railroad stations in a country we occupy? What comes next, bombing Iraq's power plants and oil refineries? How about the Green Zone? If the Iraqi Parliament doesn't pass the legislation we want it to, we can always lay a couple of JDAMs on it.

It turns out the bombed railroad station was no fluke. According to other reports, U.S. aircraft have dropped more than 200 bombs or missiles on Iraqi ground targets this year in support of U.S. ground forces at a rate double that of last year.

Nothing could testify more powerfully to the failure of U.S. efforts on the ground in Iraq than a ramp-up in airstrikes. Calling in air is the last, desperate, and usually futile action of an army that is losing. If anyone still wonders whether the "surge" is working, the increase in air strikes offers a definitive answer: It isn't.

Worse, the growing number of air strikes shows that, despite what the Marines have accomplished in Anbar province and Gen. David Petraeus's best efforts, our high command remains as incapable as ever of grasping Fourth Generation war.

To put it bluntly, there is no surer or faster way to lose in 4GW than by calling in airstrikes. It is a disaster on every level. Physically, it inevitably kills far more civilians than enemies, enraging the population against us and driving them into the arms of our opponents. Mentally, it tells the insurgents we are cowards who only dare fight them from 20,000 feet in the air.

Morally, it turns us into Goliath, a monster every real man has to fight. So negative are the results of air strikes in this kind of war that there is only one possible good number of them: zero, unless we are employing the "Hama model" of seeking total destruction, which we are not.

What explains this military lunacy, beyond simple desperation? Part of the answer, I suspect, is Air Force generals. Jointness demands they get their share of command billets in Iraq, and with very few exceptions they are mere military technicians. They know how to put bombs on targets, but they know nothing else. So, they do what they know how to do, with no comprehension of the consequences.

In fact, the U.S. Air Force recently announced it is developing its own counter-insurgency doctrine, precisely because "some people" are suggesting air strikes are counterproductive in such conflicts. Well, yes, that is what anyone with any understanding of counter-insurgency would suggest. The Air Force, of course, cares not a whit about the realities of counter-insurgency. It cares only about protecting its bureaucratic turf, its myth of "winning through air power" and its high-performance fighter-bombers, which truly are its knights in shining armor, useful only for tournaments.

Once again, we see the U.S. military riding the perfect sine wave. It will seem as if it is beginning to get things right, only to ride the wave back down again into the depths of unknowing. It brings to mind one of my favorite Bob Newhart skits. Newhart is walking slowly behind a line of an infinite number of monkeys, seated at an infinite number of typewriters, trying to write the world's great books. Bob pauses behind one of the monkeys. "Uh, Fred, come here a minute. I think this one's got something. 'To be or not to be, that is the ... gzrbnklap.' Forget about it, Fred."

In this case, the gzrgnklap is airstrikes in 4GW, and the monkey is wearing Air Force blue.

William S. Lind, expressing his own personal opinion, is director for the Center for Cultural Conservatism for the Free Congress Foundation.

Source: United Press International

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Related Links
Center for Cultural Conservatism
Iraq: The first technology war of the 21st century




Tempur-Pedic Mattress Comparison

Newsletters :: SpaceDaily Express :: SpaceWar Express :: TerraDaily Express :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News
Keen Georgian Soldiers Train For New Dangers In Iraq
Yagludja, Georgia (AFP) June 18, 2007
Spread out on a series of hills overlooking a shallow valley, a handful of Georgian soldiers scanned the horizon, squinting in the bright sun. They knew an attack was coming, it was only a matter of when. Their mission was to set up a communications post in this training area in western Georgia and maintain a signal for 48 hours.

.
Get Our Free Newsletters Via Email
  



  • Former Cold War Foes Fail To Agree On Arms Treaty Review
  • China Criticises Irresponsible Comments By Pentagon Official
  • Pentagon Drops Ideology
  • US Military Prepared For Worst With China

  • Frozen North Korean Funds Touch Down In Moscow
  • US Pushed Hard Against Taiwan Nuclear Effort In 1970s
  • Does The US Need New Nuclear Weapons
  • North Korean Funds Transfer Delayed In Moscow Due To Technical Issues

  • Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile Achieves Major Milestone
  • Coping With Gaza's Rockets
  • Raytheon And UAE Sign Rolling Airframe Missile Contract
  • Boeing Wins Next Phase Of US Air Force Missile Technology Program

  • Putin Plays The BMD Game For Keeps
  • US Air Force And Raytheon Demonstrate First Powered Flight Of Miniature Air Launched Decoy
  • Northrop Grumman And Raytheon Team Completes Third Successful KEI Motor-Fire Test
  • Apropos ABM Without Hysterics

  • EU And US Launch Airline Pollution Initiative
  • Airbus Wants To Cut CO2 Emissions By Half By 2020
  • easyJet Plans Greener Aircraft By 2015
  • Airlines To Order Nearly 30,000 New Planes In Next 20 Years

  • A160T Hummingbird Unmanned Helicopter Completes First Flight
  • Camcopter S-100 Receives European Permit To Fly
  • Thales Unveils Production Watchkeeper Air Vehicle Design
  • U-Tacs To Provide ISTAR Capability For UK Armed Forces

  • Air Support Insanity
  • Keen Georgian Soldiers Train For New Dangers In Iraq
  • Iraqis Trapped In A US Web As Senator Calls European Efforts Weak
  • Al-Qaida Makes Critical Blunder In Iraq

  • NGC Lab To Develope Prototype For Integrated Air and Missile Defense Battle Command System
  • Raytheon-Led Warrior Training Alliance Wins US Army Warfighter FOCUS Program
  • Thales And Boeing Announce FRES Team
  • QinetiQ's Polarisation Technology Results In GBP800K Contract For Further Research Into Tripwire Detection

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement