Subscribe to our free daily newsletters
. Military Space News .




Subscribe to our free daily newsletters



WAR REPORT
Coalition strike hits Kadhafi's control center

US defense chief rejects targeting Kadhafi
Aboard A Us Military Aircraft (AFP) March 20, 2011 - US Defense Secretary Robert Gates said on Sunday it would be "unwise" to have coalition forces try to kill Moamer Kadhafi in military strikes in Libya. Asked about remarks by British counterpart Liam Fox suggesting targeting Kadhafi himself, Gates said the allied operation should stick to the parameters as authorized by the UN Security Council. "I think that it's important that we operate within the mandate of the UN Security Council resolution," he said. Gates, who was speaking on a US military plane en route to Russia, said the intervention was backed by "a very diverse coalition" and warned that expanding its goals could complicate the consensus around the UN resolution.

"If we start adding additional objectives then I think we create a problem in that respect," he said. "I also think it's unwise to set as specific goals things that you may or may not be able to achieve." He also expressed caution about providing direct support to rebel forces and referred to a long term "process" that could see Kadhafi toppled. "I think this is basically going to have to be resolved by the Libyans themselves," he said. "Whether or not there is additional outside help for the rebels I think remains to be seen." Initially, the goal was to shut down Kadhafi's air force to safeguard civilians, he said. "The key is to first of all, establish the no-fly zone, to prevent him from using his military forces to slaughter his own people," he said.

Asked about criticism about the air strikes from the head of the Arab League Amr Mussa, Gates said he was reassured by renewed support for the operation by the bloc. "I saw on the news just before I got on the plane that in fact the Arab League voted had again to reassert its support. So I think we're OK," he said. Gates said governments were discussing how best to organize the military command of the operation, with Arab states reluctant to have a NATO flag over the intervention. "I think there is a sensitivity on the part of the Arab League to being seen to be operating under a NATO umbrella. And so the question is, if there's a way we can work out NATO's command and control machinery without it being a NATO mission and without a NATO flag and so on," he said. "There are a lot of players in this. And I think our first objective is to accomplish the mandate set forth in the Security Council resolution and I think we've made good progress in doing that."
by Staff Writers
Washington (AFP) March 20, 2011
An airstrike against an administrative building in a compound including Moamer Kadhafi's residence in Tripoli destroyed the Libyan leader's "command and control capability," a coalition official told AFP Sunday.

"The coalition is actively enforcing UNSCR (UN Security Council Resolution) 1973, and that in keeping with that mission, we continue to strike those targets which pose a direct threat to the Libyan people and to our ability to implement the no-fly zone," the official added.

The building, which was about 50 meters (165 feet) from the tent where Kadhafi generally meets guests, was flattened.

An AFP journlalist meanwhile Sunday saw smoke billowing from the residence and barracks at Bab el-Aziziya in the south of the Libyan capital as anti-aircraft guns fired shots.

The US military earlier Sunday said Allied strikes had crippled the air defenses of Kadhafi's embattled regime and a no-fly zone had been successfully enforced over the country.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates and top brass indicated that the American military would now look to take a back seat and warned the coalition against mission-creep, in particular against directly targeting Kadhafi.

"We judge these strikes have been very effective in significantly degrading the regime air defense capability," Vice Admiral Bill Gortney told a Pentagon briefing. "The no-fly zone is effectively in place."

French, American and British forces have launched the biggest intervention in the Arab world since the 2003 US-led invasion of Iraq, firing more than 120 Tomahawk Cruise missiles and conducting bombing raids on key Libyan targets.

Asked about remarks by British counterpart Liam Fox suggesting targeting Kadhafi himself, Gates said the allied operation should stick to the parameters as authorized by the United Nations in a vote last Thursday.

"I think that it's important that we operate within the mandate of the UN Security Council resolution," he said.

Gates, who was speaking on a US military plane en route to Russia, said the intervention was backed by "a very diverse coalition" and warned that expanding its goals could divide that consensus.

"If we start adding additional objectives then I think we create a problem in that respect," he said. "I also think it's unwise to set as specific goals things that you may or may not be able to achieve."

US President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, as well as other Western leaders, had been saying Kadhafi must go.

Such calls have been drying up as signs of divisions emerge in the coalition with the head of the Arab League suggesting Sunday that the strikes had over-reached the UN mandate.

The Pentagon dismissed reports from Kadhafi officials that the allied strikes had claimed innocent lives, saying there was no indication of any civilian casualties but confirming dozens of regime forces had been killed.

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen said the strikes had stopped Kadhafi's forces in their tracks and the aim now was to cut off their logistical support.

Mullen admitted the next steps in the process were murky, providing fresh fodder for Obama opponents who accuse him of failing to adequately set out the goals of the Libya mission.

"What we do will depends to some degree on what he (Kadhafi) does," Mullen told Fox News Sunday.

Pressed on CBS's "Face the Nation" about the endgame, he said that was "very uncertain" and indicated it would ultimately be up to other members of the coalition, rather than the United States, to decide what action to take.

"It's hard to know exactly how this turns out. He's a thug; he's a cagey guy; he's a survivor. We know that," Mullen said.

"I can't say exactly how long... the military part of this will be in effect and I think it's for others to determine where this goes long-term."

Obama has vowed that US troops will not be deployed on the ground but leading Republican critic John Boehner, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, called for further clarity.

"The president is the commander-in-chief, but the administration has a responsibility to define for the American people, the Congress, and our troops what the mission in Libya is, better explain what America's role is in achieving that mission, and make clear how it will be accomplished," he said.



Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


WAR REPORT
US missiles rain down on Libya in 'limited action'
Washington (AFP) March 19, 2011
The United States on Saturday unleashed a barrage of Tomahawk missiles against the Libyan regime's air defenses, but ruled out using ground troops in what President Barack Obama called a "limited military action." After initially taking a cautious stance on armed intervention in Libya's civil war, Obama ordered the strikes citing the threat posed to civilians by Moamer Kadhafi's forces and a ... read more







WAR REPORT
MEADS System Integration Begins At Italian Test Site

Northrop Grumman and Boeing Submit ABM Simulation Architecture Proposal

Orbital Launches PTV For Missile Defense Test

Milestone Nears For European Missile Defense Plan

WAR REPORT
Russia to double missile production from 2013: Putin

China aims new missile at Taiwan: intelligence chief

India tests two nuclear-capable missiles

Trident II D5 Missile Achieves 135th Consecutive Test Flight

WAR REPORT
Northrop Grumman Ships First Broad Area Maritime Surveillance Fuselage

Dassault, BAE press ahead with drone plan

Mexico defends decision to use US drones in drug war

Death toll up to 24 in NW Pakistan drone strike: officials

WAR REPORT
Raytheon BBN Technologies To Protect Internet Comms For Military Abroad

Advanced Emulation Accelerates Deployment Of Military Network Technologies

Tactical Communications Group Completes Deployment Of Ground Support Systems

Raytheon Announces Next Generation of ACU Interoperable Communications

WAR REPORT
Second And Third Flights Of X-47B Unmanned Combat Air System Completed

Lockheed Martin Support Enables High-Tempo F-22 Deployments Worldwide

PEO Ammo Picks Up 155mm Lightweight Howitzer Program

Raytheon Completes Work On Upgraded Early Warning Radar In Greenland

WAR REPORT
Elbit And IAI Establish Joint Company

GD Small Manufactures One Billion Rounds Of Ammunition For US Army

US hopes geopolitics can help land India jet deal

NATO creates task force to spend smarter

WAR REPORT
Obama, Rousseff take up security concerns

France back in US favor amid Libya, Japan crises

Gates lauds 'extraordinary' progress with Russia

India assesses Chinese military abilities

WAR REPORT
Scientists Build World's First Anti-Laser

Yale scientists build 'anti-laser'

'Air laser' could find bombs at a distance

ONR Achieves Milestone In Free Electron Laser Program


The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2010 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement