Subscribe free to our newsletters via your
. Military Space News .

Commentary: Defense: Mutatis mutandis
by Arnaud De Borchgrave
Washington (UPI) Feb 28, 2013

Pentagon to make 'quick decisions' on sequester cuts
Washington (AFP) Feb 28, 2013 - The Pentagon will make "some very quick decisions" on programs to be hit by automatic spending cuts under the so-called sequester, a Defense Department spokesman said Thursday.

"We will have to make some very quick decisions about programs that we may need to pare back and so forth as a result of sequestration," Pentagon spokesman George Little told reporters, as time ticked away to reach a possible deal to avert the cuts.

"We remain hopeful that some 11th hour deal can be reached by the Congress," Little said during a press briefing.

"This is a deeply problematic situation for this Department and for others. We hope to avert it," he said.

He added that "prospects aren't looking particularly good" to avoid the cuts, which go into effect on Friday.

The Pentagon has warned that US military readiness could be hurt and public and emergency services curtailed if the cuts go through.

Little said that "not everything will happen on day one," suggesting that trims to some military programs might be phased in later if a deal is not reached.

Obama invited congressional leaders to the White House on Friday -- the day the $85 billion in across-the-board cuts hit -- for talks to avert the sequester.

The painful, automatic budget cuts were envisioned as a mechanism to ensure the success of talks to cut the deficit, but no agreement has been reached and the sequester now is just hours away.

Republicans blame Obama for the stalemate, saying the sequester was his idea; the White House notes that the measure was endorsed by Congress, and at any rate, was never envisioned to actually go into force but rather as an incentive to get lawmakers to act on the deficit and national debt.

The United States fields 17 intelligence agencies with a combined annual budget of $100 billion. They employ 100,000 intelligence specialists. And we still got the genesis of two major trillion-dollar wars, Iraq and Afghanistan, back to front.

Three months before 9/11, Mullah Mohammed Omar, the Afghan Taliban chief who welcomed Osama bin Laden to Afghanistan, was willing to make a deal. His guest and now former close friend was stepping out of bounds.

Omar made that much clear to two visitors -- Ammar Turabi, a Pakistani-American who represented UPI in south Asia at that time, and this reporter.

U.S. intel specialists said, "We tried everything with Mullah Omar and nothing would budge him." But no U.S. intelligence operative actually sat down with Omar for a one-on-one talk.

This was at least an opportunity to disrupt 9/11 plans for the mass murder of some 3,000 civilians in New York.

U.S. Special Forces chased bin Laden and his band of terrorists out of Afghanistan into Pakistan Dec. 9, 2001. That should have been the end of it as we held Pakistan responsible for the terrorist monster it had created.

Instead, we have fought the longest war in our history against Taliban's ragtag guerrillas, with 48 allied nations by our side, and we are now planning to leave by the end of next year -- short of victory.

On the other front, the genesis of the 2003 invasion of Iraq should have told U.S. intelligence specialists that the defeat of the Saddam Hussein regime would be helpful to Iran, not the United States.

Three months before the U.S. invasion, a prominent Iraqi-born international businessman, flew to Washington for dinner with Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz.

The Iraqi advised: "After you invade, it is essential you keep both the Iraqi army and the ruling Baath party intact. Simply get rid of the top 50 to 100 officials in both institutions and you'll be out of there in six months with the gratitude and friendship of the Iraqi people."

The Iraqi's advice was politely dismissed because Wolfowitz's intelligence was quite different. "I believe." he rejoined, "that should we invade, it will be very much like Paris in 1944," when U.S. soldiers were greeted deliriously by a liberated populace, free after four years of Nazi occupation.

Instead, we listened to Ahmed Chalabi, an Iraqi banker who had been indicted in Jordan for a major international financial swindle and who metamorphosed into the darling of the American right and the neocons.

From there, Chalabi constantly misled U.S. intelligence and his conservative friends about what he could do to revive an Iraqi-US alliance in a liberated Iraq.

Chalabi's man for persuading U.S. intelligence that Saddam Hussein was hiding nuclear weapons was an Iraqi codenamed "Curveball" who defected to Germany but wouldn't go to Washington to be questioned by the CIA.

Curveball later recanted and said he had invented everything about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction to get permission to live in Germany with his girlfriend.

There was only one problem with Chalabi's tall tale spun with threads of disinformation. He was never America's man, but covertly Iran's.

Chalabi was the spark plug in Iraq's Maliki government's shuffle off to Tehran's sphere of influence.

U.S. intelligence, America's conservative right and the neocons got taken -- big time.

The bad call cost the U.S. taxpayer a cool $1 trillion. Some 4,500 U.S. servicemen and women were KIA. And Iran was the principal beneficiary.

Now the latest cry is that across the board budget cuts will cripple the U.S. military. Gen. Ray Odierno, the army's chief of staff, says a $40 billion reduction in the Pentagon's fiscal 2013 budget could curtail training for 80 percent of ground forces.

The U.S. Navy has delayed the deployment of one aircraft carrier to the Persian Gulf, leaving just one carrier, instead of two, to face a possible war with Iran (should Israel trigger one).

The U.S. Air Force says it has to curtail flying hours, leaving two-thirds of its pilots below acceptable norms of readiness.

The need for 9.000 tanks in the U.S. arsenal doesn't pass the Rorschach test (the psychological exam in which one looks at a series of 10 inkblots -- in this case tanks -- and then asked what one sees).

But nary a word about drones and robots and the future of warfare. A crewless submarine has already been tested. Ditto drones as fighter aircraft or bombers.

Looking and planning for the future is bound to cost less than the current tab -- 46 percent of the entire world's defense spending.

Stealth ships will be small and crewless and more lethal but hardly the kind of command an admiral dreamed of when he graduated from the Naval Academy.

Hard to imagine today, but carriers will be retired when one hostile missile from a third-rate power can score a bull's eye on the flight deck -- or a swarm of small boats on suicide missions can encircle the carrier and inflict enough damage to send it back to Norfolk, Va., for months of repairs.

The multi-service F-35 Joint Strike Fighter has already cost $70 billion to develop. Its future is assured as it employs 35,000 workers in almost all congressional districts. The F-22 ran $79 billion.

In the just published "The Insurgents: David Petraeus and the Plot to Change the American Way of War," author Fred Kaplan describes how "creative doctrine can harden into dogma" and how the "best and brightest strategists" can win the battles at home but not the wars abroad."

"By adapting the U.S. military to fight the conflicts of the modern era," says the book's blurb, "they also created the tools -- and made it more tempting -- for political leaders to wade into wars they would be wise to avoid."

One has to be irredeemably myopic not to see that the new priorities are at home, rebuilding America's aging infrastructure; prioritizing shale oil production to end our dependency on precarious foreign supplies; dismantling the armed services voluntariat of 20 years service followed by a pension and a civilian job; restoring some form of compulsory national service for young men and women.

New thinking about the proper defense posture is also long overdue. One former and recent four-star agreed privately and added, "You have no idea how tough it is to turn the Pentagon around."

As the new defense secretary, Chuck Hagel has the toughest job of all. Many of the Republican senators who opposed him have their counterparts in the Pentagon.


Related Links
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at

Comment on this article via your Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail login.

Share this article via these popular social media networks DiggDigg RedditReddit GoogleGoogle

Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News

Japan PM quotes Britain's Iron Lady on island dispute
Tokyo (AFP) Feb 28, 2013
Japan's prime minister on Thursday quoted comments by former British premier Margaret Thatcher about the Falklands War as he spoke about Tokyo's acrimonious islands dispute with China. Shinzo Abe channeled the Iron Lady in a speech to parliament in which he talked about Japan's resolve to defend the islands claimed by Beijing in the East China Sea. "Our national interests are immutable f ... read more

US radar to boost missile defence in Japan

Israel tests Arrow but funding cuts loom

Israel tests new Arrow missile interceptor

JLENS demonstrates tactical ballistic missile defense capability

Syria missile strikes in Aleppo leave 58 dead: NGO

India wants to sell Russia BraMos missiles

Brazil to open talks on buying Russian missiles

JASSM Completes Lot 6 Reliability Assessment Program Testing

Better workstations for drone operators may reduce mishaps

Boeing Phantom Eye Completes Second Flight

US military may take over part of CIA drone war

First Flight of nEUROn UAV Demonstrator Conducted

Boeing Receives USAF Contract for Integrated C4ISR Targeting Solution

Air Operations Center Modernization Program PDR Completed

Advanced Communications Waveforms Ported To Navy Digital Modular Radios

Astrium tapped for communications network

Raytheon's new precision artillery ready for low-rate initial production

New clip-on Thermal Weapon Sight offers more accurate targeting

Caribbean security firms see niche market

Bolstering the Front Line of Biological Warfare Response

Britain's MoD under fire for 'wasting' billions

Greece and France to sign defence agreement: Le Drian

Pentagon to make 'quick decisions' on sequester cuts

India hikes defence spending by 21%

Outside View: Unintended consequences

Japan scrambles fighters to meet China plane

Japan PM quotes Britain's Iron Lady on island dispute

Commentary: Defense: Mutatis mutandis

Scientists delve deeper into carbon nanotubes

New taxonomy of platinum nanoclusters

Nano-machines for 'bionic proteins'

Forging a new periodic table using nanostructures

The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2014 - Space Media Network. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement