Subscribe to our free daily newsletters
. Military Space News .

Subscribe to our free daily newsletters

Euro-BMD Bad For US

Interceptor in action.
By Robert Gard
UPI Outside View Commentator
Washington (UPI) Jun 22, 2007
The Bush administration has announced its intention to build a national missile defense complex in Europe to supplement current deployments of the system's components, including interceptor sites in Alaska and California. This decision is premature, misguided, wasteful of billions of dollars and damaging to U.S. relationships with our European allies and Russia.

National missile defense, now called the Ground-Based Midcourse Missile Defense System, or GMD, is being developed to protect the United States against a limited attack from warheads launched on long-range ballistic missiles by so-called rogue states. The intent is to destroy incoming weapons during their flight in space, called the "midcourse" phase of their trajectory.

Yet GMD is still in its developmental phase, by no means ready for deployment. It has not demonstrated the capability under realistic conditions to destroy a target in space, and operational testing of the system is not yet even scheduled. Knowledgeable defense scientists believe the system will never be able to defeat countermeasures that any nation capable of fielding complex intercontinental ballistic missiles will be able to employ with ease.

In focusing initially on defending against a potential threat from North Korea, the U.S. Missile Defense Agency perceived that there would be gaps in the coverage of missiles launched from Iran that could be filled by a European deployment. Recently, however, the MDA concluded that without deploying elements of GMD in Europe, other system components will protect the entire United States against an attack by ballistic missiles launched from Iran by 2011, well before that country will be able to field an intercontinental missile capability.

So now MDA cites the indivisibility of U.S. and European security interests as a justification for deploying a missile defense complex in Europe. Yet the administration negotiated directly with the Czech and Polish governments without broader consultation, thereby triggering considerable consternation throughout the continent and disrupting the NATO alliance. As the NATO Secretary General stated critically, "NATO is the right place to have this discussion on missile defense."

MDA also claims that deploying GMD in Europe will promote regional stability. But the announcement of the deployment and the reaction to it has created considerable instability. Russian President Vladimir Putin has strongly denounced the deployment, although he recently offered the use of a Russian radar site in Azerbaijan to substitute for the radar planned for deployment in the Czech Republic.

Putin's basic concern is that the missile defense deployment is yet another U.S. and NATO military encroachment into former Warsaw Pact countries close to Russia's borders, and because he suspects that further development of the GMD complex may present a more significant challenge to Russia's security in the future. Putin's resultant threats to declare a moratorium on Russia's observance of the Conventional Forces in Europe Treaty and his hint of withdrawal from the Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces Treaty deeply concern our European allies.

There are other serious problems with a GMD missile defense in Europe that should be considered:

-- The interceptor missiles planned for installation in Poland involve difficult and less-tested technology than those presently deployed in Alaska and California. Initial flight tests are scheduled for 2010, and deployment of up to 10 operational missiles is programmed to be completed by 2013. Previous problems with GMD and related programs indicate that this timeline is overly optimistic.

-- The complex in Europe will have only 20 minutes to detect, track, and intercept a missile launched from Iran. This would present a highly difficult challenge to a system that has met stringent test standards and is manned by a well-trained crew on quick-reaction alert. But essential operational testing to prove the effectiveness of the system is not yet even projected for the European complex.

-- The European deployment is currently estimated to cost in excess of $4 billion. If past is prologue, this will increase substantially.

Since Iran will not be able to develop long-range missiles until well into the next decade, as reliable intelligence agencies estimate, there is ample time for continued development of the GMD system to determine if it can somehow be made to work effectively. The launch of a ballistic missile can also be traced to its source, so it seems highly doubtful that Iran would choose to attack the United States or Europe with a ballistic missile, thereby inviting a devastating retaliatory strike.

Whatever marginal benefit may be perceived to accrue from deploying a European component of GMD is clearly outweighed by its costs, both financial and political. The bottom line is a no-brainer: The third GMD missile defense site in Europe should be put on ice.

(Lt. Gen. Robert G. Gard Jr., a former president of National Defense University, is the senior military fellow at the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation in Washington, D.C.)

(United Press International's "Outside View" commentaries are written by outside contributors who specialize in a variety of important issues. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of United Press International. In the interests of creating an open forum, original submissions are invited.)

Source: RIA Novosti

Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Related Links
Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
Learn about missile defense at
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at
All about missiles at
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at

Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News

Kinetic Energy Weapons Making Progress In ABM Program
Washington (UPI) Jun 24, 2007
Last week's successful test-firing of the first stage rocket motor for the proposed U.S. Kinetic Energy Interceptor was totally ignored by the mainstream U.S. media and got only a handful of references even in the specialized defense and aerospace publications. But it offers the hope of a bold new era in ballistic missile defense technology. U.S. Missile Defense Agency Director Lt. Gen. Henry A. "Trey" Obering announced the successful test on June 15.

  • US Ready To Work On New Treaty To Replace START Treaty
  • The Recovery Of Europe Driven By Surging Economy
  • Former Cold War Foes Fail To Agree On Arms Treaty Review
  • China Criticises Irresponsible Comments By Pentagon Official

  • Iran Says Zero Chance Of US Attack
  • North Korea Prepared To Shut Reactor As Bush Searches For Foreign Policy Success
  • Iran Claims 100 Kilo Of Enriched Uranium, Israel Airforce Trains For Distant Missions
  • Pakistan Builds Third Nuclear Reactor For Bombs

  • Indian Army Commissions BrahMos Cruise Missiles
  • North Korea Fires Short-Range Missile
  • Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile Achieves Major Milestone
  • Coping With Gaza's Rockets

  • Euro-BMD Bad For US
  • Kinetic Energy Weapons Making Progress In ABM Program
  • Russia And Azerbaijan Confirm Readiness To Host US Anti-Missile System
  • MDA Test Fires Kinetic Energy Interceptor Motor

  • F-35 Lightning 2 Pushing Ahead On All Fronts
  • EU And US Launch Airline Pollution Initiative
  • Airbus Wants To Cut CO2 Emissions By Half By 2020
  • easyJet Plans Greener Aircraft By 2015

  • Northrop Grumman Hunter Clocks Up 50000 Hours Flight Time
  • A160T Hummingbird Unmanned Helicopter Completes First Flight
  • Camcopter S-100 Receives European Permit To Fly
  • Thales Unveils Production Watchkeeper Air Vehicle Design

  • US Troops Kill Al Qaeda Terrorists In Iraq
  • US Terror Charges Against Iran Are Lies Claims Top Official
  • Gates And Pace Warn Of Tough Fighting And Higher Casualties In Iraq
  • The Democrats And The Dilemma Of An Iraq Withdrawal

  • Sandia Supports Development Of New US Army Cannon System
  • NGC Lab To Develope Prototype For Integrated Air and Missile Defense Battle Command System
  • Raytheon-Led Warrior Training Alliance Wins US Army Warfighter FOCUS Program
  • Thales And Boeing Announce FRES Team

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement