Subscribe free to our newsletters via your
. Military Space News .




Subscribe free to our newsletters via your




















Experts Warn West Against Attacking Iran

The USS Stennis battle group is currently patrolling in the region.
by Staff Writers
London (AFP) Feb 05, 2007
Military action against Iran to shut down its nuclear programme would be "highly dangerous" and "counter-productive", a group of leading think-tanks and other experts warned Monday. In particular they call for British Prime Minister Tony Blair to use his influence to urge the United States to talk to Tehran. "Only through direct US-Iranian engagement can an agreement be found," it says.

"The international community must do all they can to make sure the soft power options of sanctions and diplomacy prevent the unthinkable," said Lorna Fitzsimons, head of the British-Israel Communications and Research Centre.

Among the report's authors are the development charity Oxfam, the Blairite think-tank the Foreign Policy Centre, along with Unison, Amicus and the GMB -- three of Britain's biggest trade unions.

Also co-authoring the report are religious organisations such as the Muslim Council of Britain, and Pax Christi, an international Christian anti-war charity.

"The consequences of any possible future military action could be wholly counter-productive as well as highly dangerous. Diplomatic solutions to the Iranian nuclear issue must be pursued resolutely," the report says.

It notes several possible negative consequences of military action, including strengthening Iran's resolve to become a nuclear weapons power and the likelihood of Iran's exit from the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

Armed action would also inflame the war on terror, and could have a direct economic impact on Europe, which -- due to its dependence on Iran for energy -- "could feel the squeeze and possibly even experience recession."

It called for Britain to use its diplomatic clout with the United States to "advocate for direct US engagement" which it says is essential to resolving the current situation.

"It cannot be said that the potential for diplomacy has been explored fully when direct talks between Iran and the US have not taken place," the report says.

The UN Security Council late last year passed a resolution imposing limited sanctions on Iran for its refusal to halt uranium enrichment -- the process that makes nuclear fuel as well as material for making an atomic bomb.

The West, and in particular the United States, fears the nuclear programme is covertly designed to make weapons, while Iran insists it is entirely peaceful.

On Sunday, three ex-senior US military officers -- including a former commander-in-chief at US Central Command -- and leaders in Britain's Christian, Muslim and Jewish faiths said an attack would be "disastrous" for world peace.

In separate letters to the Sunday Times and the Independent on Sunday, they urged the international community to pursue diplomacy, rather than military action, to resolve the stand-off.

They said Britain, and in particular Prime Minister Tony Blair, had a key role to play in dissuading US President George W. Bush from the military option, after reports that both the United States and Israel were planning a strategic strike.

Source: Agence France-Presse

Related Links
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com

No Plans For Military Action On Iran Says Blair
London (AFP) Feb 06, 2007
British Prime Minister Tony Blair said Tuesday there were no plans for military action against Iran, but there is growing alarm at Tehran's defiance of the international community. Blair reiterated that, if the Islamic republic were to cooperate with the West in terms of curbing its nuclear plans and other actions, "a whole series of doors would open up to them. Nobody is talking or planning military intervention," Blair told a parliamentary committee.







  • China Check-Mating America
  • Climate Report Stokes Heat Under US And China
  • US And Russia Hold High-Level Talks Amid Rise In Bilateral Tensions
  • China Takes A Few Shots In The Dark

  • Experts Warn West Against Attacking Iran
  • Ending Iranian Defiance
  • Japan Baulks As US Talks Aid For North Korea
  • Iran Nuclear Ambitions Can Be Stopped Without Violence Says Israel

  • Israeli Media Says Syria Has Tested Scud
  • India Test-Fires Supersonic Cruise Missile
  • Iran Seeking Longer-Range Strike Force
  • Russia To Help India Test Supersonic Cruise Missile

  • Russia Seeks Pact Over US Global Anti-Missile System
  • Iran Threat Behind Polish Interest In Missile Defense
  • New Missile Warning Satellite Built By Lockheed Martin Completes Key Environmental Test Phase
  • Ukraine Calls US Missile Plans A 'Threat'

  • Anger As Britons Face Air Tax Hike
  • Bats In Flight Reveal Unexpected Aerodynamics
  • Lockheed Martin And Boeing Form Strategic Alliance To Promote Next-Gen Air Transportation System
  • Time to test the Guardian Missile Defense System For Commercial Aircraft

  • USAF Sponsors Fully Automatic Take-Off And Landing Demonstrations Of Proxy Aviation's SkyWatcher UAV
  • US Navy Buys Two Northrop Grumman Fire Scouts To Refine Concept Of Operations
  • Northrop Grumman, EADS Joint Venture To Develop German Euro Hawk
  • Iran Builds Hand-Launched Drones

  • US Could Reposition Troops If Iraq Fails Says Gates
  • Detailing Combat Copter Battles
  • The Surge Is On In Iraq
  • Grim US Options In Iraq

  • India's Showcase Chopper Crashes Ahead Of Airshow
  • Future Combat Systems Completes Experiment and Soldier-testing Of Key Technologies
  • Language Learning Via Video Gaming
  • Navy Takes Delivery of Airborne Laser Mine Detection System

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement