Subscribe to our free daily newsletters
. Military Space News .




Subscribe to our free daily newsletters



Landmark Foreign Policy Opinion Poll Criticized

China is perceived to be a rising power by all the nations studied. Americans think that China will be a close second to the United States in 10 years time, while the Chinese recognize they are second to the United States at present and believe they will draw even within a decade.
by Michael Stothard
UPI Correspondent
Washington (UPI) Oct 17, 2006
A landmark study documenting Asian and American opinion on foreign policy issues has been criticized for its methodology and called "weak" by some experts. The study by the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, entitled "The United States and the Rise of China and India," surveyed about 2,000 people from China, South Korea, Australia, India and America.

They were asked their opinion on foreign policy issues such as globalization, terrorism, the rise of China and India and perceived critical threats to their countries.

Among its findings, the study revealed the Chinese public is a bigger advocate of free market principles than Americans; 87 percent of the Chinese were positive about globalization and free trade, compared to only 60 percent of Americans. The report attributes this to the "perceived link to job losses" that free trade areas have for Americans.

Australians, who have an economy similar to the United States' in many respects, felt a similar way about globalization, with only 64 percent being positive.

Analysts say this report dispels the notion that public dissatisfaction over the Iraq war has pushed Americans into an isolationist frame of mind.

"The survey findings couldn't be clearer. Americans do not want to retreat to an isolationist foreign policy," Marshall M. Bouton, president of the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, said. "Americans understand that China and India are rising economic and political forces, and want the U.S. government to choose engagement."

Surprisingly, the report found that South Koreans see global warming as the most critical threat to their country, while danger from unfriendly nuclear powers ranks only fourth.

Indians see themselves, in terms of global influence and technological innovation, as second only to the United States. On these two issues, Indians think they will be an even closer second to the United States in 10 years time.

But despite strong indications India will be a leading economic power in the coming years, the Chinese, American and South Korean publics believe India has the lowest world influence out of all the countries measured. Indians, meanwhile, overestimate their world influence, according to the report.

Norman Ornstein, a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, was concerned that "India is off the radar screens of the American people. They are and economic power down the road and most American haven't seen this yet."

China is perceived to be a rising power by all the nations studied. Americans think that China will be a close second to the United States in 10 years time, while the Chinese recognize they are second to the United States at present and believe they will draw even within a decade.

The survey discounted all candidates that were not literate or had no formal education -- eliminating a mere 1.8 percent of Chinese involved but 20 percent of Indian participants -- on the grounds that illiterate and uneducated people had a tendency to guess answers.

Kenneth Ballen, president of the public opinion polling organization Terror Free Tomorrow, criticized the decision to exclude the uneducated. He said that "don't knows" can in fact tell you something; for example, that people do not care about the issue in question. Also, "you just don't know what people are going to say until you ask them," he said.

More importantly, Ballen added, the decision to discount the uneducated makes comparing countries problematic: The survey of China accounts for 98.2 percent of the population while the survey of India measures only 80 percent, making the China survey more representative of the Chinese population than the Indian one.

Comparing the two is therefore like "comparing apples and oranges," according to Ballen.

The study, which was so concerned with the rise of India and China, was also criticized for failing to adequately tackle the many possible meanings of the word "rise."

Stephen Kull, the director of the Program on International Policy Attitudes, condemned the study as "weak" in this respect.

He suggested that a "rise" in a country was not just an increase in technological innovation or influence, as the study seems to suggest. He said that the "rise" of a country can be measured in terms of economic or military progress, but that culture and food are just as important.

Kull stressed the significance of increased political freedom and social justice as a gauge of development. "Future studies should really dig more deeply into what 'rise' really means," he said.

Source: United Press International

Related Links
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com

Russia Asks US To Clarify Its Missile Defense Plans In Europe
Moscow, Russia (RIA Novosti) Oct 17, 2006
Russia wants the U.S. to clarify its plans for the deployment of its anti-missile shield in Europe, the chief of the General Staff of Russia's Armed Forces said Monday. The United States has ambitious plans to deploy a network of anti-missile systems across the world to protect itself and its allies from threats from countries such as Iran and North Korea, and there has been speculation they would be based in at least two former Communist-bloc countries, which Russia sees as a threat to its national security.







  • Landmark Foreign Policy Opinion Poll Criticized
  • Russia Asks US To Clarify Its Missile Defense Plans In Europe
  • Russia Bending To China Over Expectations On North Korea
  • Japan Looks To Landmark Military Role In North Korean Crisis

  • North Korea Tells World Not To Follow US, Labels Sanctions "Declaration Of War"
  • US Warns North Korea Against Second Nuclear Test
  • Rice Goes To Asia With Sweeping Plan For North Korea Cargo Inspections
  • New System Needed To Prevent New Nuclear Weapons States Says IAEA Chief

  • Command Destruct/Self Destruct Capability Tested In Surface-Launched AMRAAM
  • Raytheon Awarded US Army Contract For Wireless Precision Assault Missiles
  • Ukraine Seeks Missile Alliance With Israel
  • BAE Systems Inertial Measurement Unit Selected For New Air-to-air Missile

  • Aerojet Wins SLIRBM Engine Development Contract
  • Israel Probes Naval Missile Defense Failure
  • Raytheon Sensor Offers Air Force Early Missile Warning Alternative
  • Northrop Grumman Bids For Army Integrated Air And Missile Defense Battle Command System

  • China Marks 50th Anniversary Of Aerospace Industry
  • German-Chinese Aviation Opens New Horizons For Cooperation
  • GAO Report On Progress Of Implementing Aerospace Recommendations
  • US Air-Transportation System Must Become More Agile

  • Video Imagery Delivered To Military Forces In Urban Combat
  • AAI Corp Receives Unmanned Systems Contracts
  • US Air Force To Study A Pilotless U-2
  • Boeing Manned/Unmanned Light Helicopter Makes First Flight

  • Updated Iraq Survey Affirms Earlier Mortality Estimates
  • Assessing The New Iraqi Army In Late 2006
  • US Commander In Iraq Says No More Troops Needed Now
  • Winds Of Change In Iraq

  • Boeing Completes Successful FAB-T Preliminary Design Review
  • Lockheed Martin Rolls Out F-22 Slated For Operations In The Pacific Region
  • Portable 'Lab On A Chip' Could Speed Blood Tests For Soldiers
  • Lockheed Martin Awarded Contract For Global Combat Support System

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement