Subscribe to our free daily newsletters
. Military Space News .

Subscribe to our free daily newsletters

Moscow Says Offer To On Joint Radar Use Still Stands

Almost a work of art
by Staff Writers
Moscow (RIA Novosti) Dec 30, 2008
Russia's offer to the U.S. on joint use of the Gabala radar station it leases from Azerbaijan is still on the table, a first Russian deputy foreign minister said on Monday.

"Our proposal remains on the table. The new U.S. administration will encounter serious problems with regard to the implementation of its third missile site plan in Europe. We are not exerting any pressure on the U.S. administration here," Andrei Denisov said.

He added that Russia's proposal was more "cost effective" than other projects since the radar station was already out there and could operate "for decades to come."

Moscow has strongly opposed the possible deployment by the U.S. of 10 interceptor missiles in Poland and a radar in the Czech Republic as a threat to its security and nuclear deterrence. Washington says the defenses are needed to deter possible strikes from "rogue states."

Russia has offered the United States the use of its radar stations in Armavir in southern Russia and Gabala in Azerbaijan as alternatives, but Washington said they would only be used as "supplements," if at all.

Russian President Dmitry Medvedev threatened to retaliate over the U.S. missile shield plans in Central Europe in November by deploying Iskander-M short-range missiles in the country's westernmost region, which borders NATO members Poland and Lithuania, if the U.S. went ahead with the move.

However, Medvedev subsequently said in an interview with France's Figaro newspaper that Russia could "reconsider this response if the new U.S. administration is ready to once again review and analyze all the consequences of its decisions to deploy the missiles and radar facilities."

Washington has provided new proposals to ease Russia's concerns over the planned European missile shield. New confidence-building steps, in particular, would allow Russian monitors access to missile defense facilities in Poland and the Czech Republic.

Russia called the new U.S. proposals "insufficient" and insisted that the U.S. abandon its missile shield plans in Europe altogether.

The chief of the U.S. missile defense agency has said a Russian radar site in Azerbaijan is too close to Iran to serve as a replacement for the planned European U.S. missile defense site.

Lt. Gen. Henry Obering said the Russian proposal was worth pursuing but only as a complement to the radar and interceptor missiles in the Czech Republic and Poland. "It would be too close to serve as a mid-course radar," he said.

He added that the U.S. did not have boost phase defenses yet, "so we can't engage very close to Iran for the long-range threat, and if you get too far back, you begin to roll back coverage and expose countries that could be vulnerable."

"So that's why we chose Poland and the Czech Republic. It gave us the azimuth coverage and the range necessary," the U.S. official said.

He has also strongly denied Russia's claim - that it could be used against them - saying the system would be too close to Russia launch points to be effective.

"The system we are fielding has nothing to do with Russia," Obering said.

Source: RIA Novosti

Share This Article With Planet Earth DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook

Related Links
- Learn about missile defense at
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at
All about missiles at
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at

Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News

What Motivates Iran And Russia On The S-300 Deal Part Two
Washington (UPI) Dec 29, 2008
How should one interpret the conflicting messages coming out of Moscow and Tehran last week about over whether Russia has sent S-300 air defense system components to Iran?

  • Vaclav Klaus, Czech president turned 'European dissident'
  • US Navy frigate arrives in Georgian port: embassy
  • 50 years of intrigue in US-Cuba ties
  • Russia optimistic on US ties under Obama: deputy minister

  • NKorea's first foreign university delayed by politics: fund-raisers
  • US signs protocol boosting nuclear monitoring
  • BMD Focus: Bulava fails again
  • Book: Soviets stole H-bomb secrets

  • Russian Military Confirms 13 Strategic Missile Launches For 2009
  • Russia selling surface-to-air missiles to Libya, Syria: report
  • Lebanese army finds seven missiles pointed at Israel
  • Russia denies delivering S-300 missiles to Iran

  • Moscow Says Offer To On Joint Radar Use Still Stands
  • What Motivates Iran And Russia On The S-300 Deal Part Two
  • Atlantic Eye: Lockerbie to missile defense
  • The S-300 Mystery Deepens Part One

  • China Eastern says bailout increased to one billion dollars
  • Britain's environment minister concerned by Heathrow plan
  • Climate protesters cause chaos at British airport
  • Thompson Files: Protect U.S. aerospace

  • Skylark 1 LE Selected By Israeli Ministry Of Defense
  • Russia mulls unprecedented Israel drones purchase
  • Raven UAS Certified By Italian Ministry Of Defense
  • Navy Targets Unmanned Aircraft

  • Iraq signs military accords with Britain, Australia
  • Hunting For Iraqi Weapons Part One
  • Feature: Iraq's milestone for new year
  • Expiry of UN mandate major step to Iraqi sovereignty

  • Analysis: U.S. needs for language critical
  • Boeing Begins Final Assembly Of RAAF FA-18F Super Hornets
  • Docs to learn battlefield acupuncture
  • Dutch ministry favours Joint Strike Fighter

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement