Subscribe to our free daily newsletters
. Military Space News .

Subscribe to our free daily newsletters

No Chance Of Quick Success In North Korea Talks

A North Korean soldier marches at the border village of Panmunjom, 07 February 2007, in the demilitarized zone dividing South and North Korea. North Korea will resume the six-party talks on dismantling the communist nation's atomic weapons programme in Beijing 08 February. Photo courtesy AFP.
by Jun Kwanwoo and Shigemi Sato
Beijing (AFP) Feb 07, 2007
North Korea will not give up its nuclear arms anytime soon, the chief US envoy to six-nation talks on Pyongyang's atomic programme said here Wednesday as he arrived for another round of negotiations. US Assistant Secretary of State Christopher Hill reiterated that he was only hoping to make a start in convincing North Korea to recommit to a September 2005 deal in which it said it would give up its nuclear arms.

"I want to emphasise the real success will be when we complete the September '05 agreement -- not just when we start (implementing) the '05 agreement, but when we finish it," Hill told reporters at Beijing airport.

"We are not going to finish that this week. Maybe this will be a good first step," Hill said. "We will see how it goes."

The search for a "first step" comes as the on-again, off-again talks -- involving host China, the two Koreas, the United States, Japan and Russia -- approach their fourth year with little sign of progress.

The talks failed to prevent North Korea from conducting its first atomic test in October last year, and the United States has since engaged in unusually direct diplomacy with the Stalinist nation to convince it to disarm.

Rare one-on-one talks between Hill and the North Korean envoy to the talks, Kim Kye-Gwan, in Berlin last month set the stage for the new round of six-party negotiations.

The talks are scheduled to start in the Chinese capital mid-afternoon on Thursday.

The Russian, Japanese and South Korean envoys also arrived, or were due to land, in Beijing on Wednesday, with Kim expected to fly in on Thursday morning.

"North Korea should be ready to demonstrate its willingness to denuclearise with actions and should not make unreasonable demands," South Korean chief envoy Chun Yung-Woo told reporters on arrival in the Chinese capital.

"The six-party talks are once again at a moment of truth," he said.

Japan's negotiator Kenichiro Sasae conveyed the same sense of a negotiating process reaching a crucial moment where results were needed.

"I believe the six-party talks are at a watershed in this round. What's important is that we take concrete steps towards denuclearisation of North Korea," Sasae told journalists in Beijing.

Under the 2005 agreement, North Korea would abandon its nuclear weapons programme in return for security guarantees, energy benefits and other aid.

But it walked out of the talks two months later in protest at unrelated sanctions imposed on it by the United States for alleged money laundering and counterfeiting.

Although the North agreed to another round of six-nation talks in December last year under international pressure following its atomic test, it has continued to insist that no progress will be made until the sanctions are lifted.

The United States has also remained firm on the sanctions. But Hill said in the lead up to this week's talks that Washington may be prepared to offer economic incentives to begin the process of North Korea disarming.

earlier related report
South Korea, US discuss relocating military bases
Seoul (AFP) Feb 7 - South Korea and the United States on Wednesday began talks on security issues including a 10.6-billion-dollar plan to relocate US military bases, officials said.

Richard Lawless, deputy US defence undersecretary for Asia and Pacific affairs, and his South Korean counterpart Jeon Jei-Guk were meeting for two days of Security Policy Initiative (SPI) talks.

"At the SPI talks, the two sides will discuss key pending issues including the transfer of wartime operational control and the relocation of bases," a South Korean defence ministry spokesman said.

The top US commander in South Korea vowed last month to fight any delay in the base relocation plan. General B.B. Bell said his troops had to endure "lousy" living conditions in their current quarters.

South Korea's defence ministry said in December it would not be able to complete the relocation by 2008 as scheduled, but gave no new date. It attributed the delay to protests by residents whose lands had been taken over, and to a dispute over how the cost of relocation was shared.

Some 29,500 US troops are stationed here to help 680,000 South Korean forces face up to North Korea's 1.1-million-strong military.

As part of a global realignment, the US forces want to consolidate 35 bases across the nation into two hub bases by 2008 -- one at Pyeongtaek, 70 kilometres (45 miles) south of Seoul, and the other at Daegu, 300 kilometres southeast of the capital.

The Camp Humphreys base at Pyeongtaek is due to triple in size and become the US military's chief installation.

The huge Yongsan base in central Seoul, at the centre of much of the delay, is among those scheduled to close.

The two sides are also discussing the transfer of wartime operational control over both US and South Korean forces, which is currently in American hands.

Seoul plans to regain wartime control over its forces by 2012, citing national pride and the new US military global strategy. The US has proposed an even earlier date of 2009.

The two Koreas have remained technically at war since the 1950-53 Korean War ended in an armistice with no follow-up peace treaty. Raising tensions, North Korea conducted a nuclear test on October 9 last year.

Source: Agence France-Presse

Related Links
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at
Search SpaceDaily
Subscribe To SpaceDaily Express

  • US Military Must Stand Ready To Face Threats Says Gates
  • US Asks India To "Try Us" As Defence Partner
  • Space Foundation Says NASA Budget Proposal Inadequate To Assure US Leadership In Space
  • Assuring Vital Interests Drives US Space Policy

  • Iran Test-Fires Russian Air Defence Missiles
  • Report That US And North Korea Signed Nuke Deal Memorandum Last Month In January
  • No Chance Of Quick Success In North Korea Talks
  • Iran Nuclear Ambitions Can Be Stopped Without Violence Says Israel

  • India Test-Fires Supersonic Cruise Missile
  • Israeli Media Says Syria Has Tested Scud
  • Iran Seeking Longer-Range Strike Force
  • Russia To Help India Test Supersonic Cruise Missile

  • Raytheon Completes Patriot Live-Fire Test With 3-for-3 Successes
  • Iran Threat Behind Polish Interest In Missile Defense
  • Northrop Grumman To Test Fire Kinetic Energy Interceptor Booster In 2008
  • Russia Seeks Pact Over US Global Anti-Missile System

  • Lockheed Martin And Boeing Form Strategic Alliance To Promote Next-Gen Air Transportation System
  • Time to test the Guardian Missile Defense System For Commercial Aircraft
  • Operational Testing And Evaluation Of Guardian Commercial Airline Anti-Missile System Begins
  • Anger As Britons Face Air Tax Hike

  • Boeing ScanEagle Team Achieves Compliance With NATO UAV Interoperability Standard
  • USAF Sponsors Fully Automatic Take-Off And Landing Demonstrations Of Proxy Aviation's SkyWatcher UAV
  • US Navy Buys Two Northrop Grumman Fire Scouts To Refine Concept Of Operations
  • Northrop Grumman, EADS Joint Venture To Develop German Euro Hawk

  • Bush Takes One More Gamble In The Mideast
  • General Casey Turns To Plain Speaking
  • US Could Reposition Troops If Iraq Fails Says Gates
  • US Iraq Commander Denies Iraq Policy A Failure

  • India's Showcase Chopper Crashes Ahead Of Airshow
  • Future Combat Systems Completes Experiment and Soldier-testing Of Key Technologies
  • Novel Ames Lab Composite May Replace Depleted Uranium
  • Language Learning Via Video Gaming

  • The contents herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2005 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy statement