. Military Space News .
Obama vows to 'finish the job' in Afghanistan

US expects NATO to join possible troop buildup: Pentagon
Washington (AFP) Nov 24, 2009 - The US military expects NATO allies to send more troops to Afghanistan if President Barack Obama decides to order reinforcements, the Pentagon said on Tuesday. "Clearly if the president decides to commit additional forces to Afghanistan, there would be an expectation that our allies would also commit additional forces," press secretary Geoff Morrell told a news conference. Over the past three years, allies in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization have consistently sent additional forces to Afghanistan following the deployment of US reinforcements, he said. Morrell said "the bottom line is there is no denying that NATO has ponied up significant numbers of additional forces as we have added forces over the last several years" and that has sometimes been "overlooked."

About 68,000 American troops are stationed in Afghanistan along with about 42,000 other foreign forces in the NATO-led mission. Obama on Tuesday vowed to "finish the job" in Afghanistan and promised he would soon announce his decision on whether to send tens of thousands of additional forces to battle insurgents. The US president said he would spell out the "obligations" of allies and make clear that "the Afghan people ultimately are going to have to provide for their own security" in an announcement after Thursday's Thanksgiving holiday. It was unlikely that NATO allies would quickly follow Obama's decision with their own announcements of more troops, Morrell said. Germany, the third largest troop contributor to the international mission in Afghanistan, has said any increase in its 4,500-strong contingent would be assessed once it reviews Obama's decision and after a conference due in January.

At a meeting of European allies on December 7, NATO commanders were expected to focus on European contributions to the Afghan mission, including possible forces for training the Afghan army and police, a diplomat said in Brussels. However, a NATO military commander warned that "European countries are not going to send many real reinforcements." The officer added: "They could keep troops -- several thousand at most -- that were sent on a temporary basis to provide security around the Afghan presidential election" held in August.
by Staff Writers
Washington (AFP) Nov 24, 2009
President Barack Obama, vowing to "finish the job" in Afghanistan, promised Tuesday he would soon announce his decision on sending tens of thousands more US troops to battle Al-Qaeda and the Taliban.

Obama said he would make an announcement after Thursday's Thanksgiving holiday, spelling out the "obligations" of US allies and making clear that "the Afghan people ultimately are going to have to provide for their own security.

"After eight years, some of those years in which we did not have, I think, either the resources or the strategy to get the job done, it is my intention to finish the job," he said after talks with Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

Aides declined to comment on reports Obama would use a prime-time speech next Tuesday to unveil plans to try to turn the worsening conflict around by sending some 34,000 more US soldiers to fight the insurgents.

"We are going to dismantle and degrade their capabilities and ultimately dismantle and destroy their networks. And Afghanistan's stability is important to that process," Obama promised.

Obama faces a US public sharply divided on the war and calls from some Democratic allies to set a flexible timetable for withdrawal eight years after US-led forces invaded Afghanistan following the September 11, 2001 attacks.

"I feel very confident that when the American people hear a clear rationale for what we're doing there and how we intend to achieve our goals, that they will be supportive," he predicted.

Obama also said "the whole world" had a responsibility to help the US-led mission in Afghanistan, and that his announcement would detail "the obligations of our international partners."

After months of deliberations, under fire from Republican foes for "dithering" on a decision, Obama held his ninth and final strategy session with top commanders and national security aides for two hours late Monday.

The president has been weighing requests from his Afghan war commander, General Stanley McChrystal, to send up to 40,000 more troops to join the 68,000 US troops already there.

Other officials, including the US ambassador to Kabul, Karl Eikenberry, have warned against ramping up troop levels until the government in Kabul clamps down on rampant corruption and improves delivery of key services.

The Pentagon said Tuesday it expected reluctant NATO allies to stump up more troops if Obama decides to order reinforcements.

"Clearly if the president decides to commit additional forces to Afghanistan, there would be an expectation that our allies would also commit additional forces," press secretary Geoff Morrell told a news conference.

NATO allies, whose contributions bring foreign forces in Afghanistan to about 110,000, are due to take up the question of sending more troops at upcoming gatherings of the military alliance December 3-4 and on December 7.

However, a NATO military commander warned that "European countries are not going to send many real reinforcements."

The officer added: "They could keep troops -- several thousand at most -- that were sent on a temporary basis to provide security around the Afghan presidential election" held in August.

That disputed contest ultimately resulted in another five-year term for embattled Afghan President Hamid Karzai, who has drawn intense US pressure to battle corruption in government.

The top US military commander, Admiral Michael Mullen, warned in September that he considered the Afghan government's credibility problems at home to be a menace "equal to the threat from the Taliban."

As resurgent Islamist fighters made 2009 the deadliest year for US and allied forces in Afghanistan, a new opinion poll released by CNN showed that roughly half of Americans support sending tens of thousands more troops, while just 45 percent say they are in favor of the war.

Obama also faces pressure in the US Congress from Democratic allies who see the war's cost as sucking hundreds of billions from much-needed projects at home.

A few senior Democratic lawmakers have proposed creating a special tax, chiefly on high-income earners, to pay for the war, while one Democratic senator, Russell Feingold, has pushed for a flexible withdrawal timetable.

Some fret privately that Obama's time in office could be defined by a decision to escalate the conflict, as the Vietnam War ultimately ate away at Lyndon Johnson's presidency.

A CNN poll Tuesday found Americans deeply divided about deploying more US troops to Afghanistan, with 50 percent in favor of sending tens of thousands more troops and 49 percent against.

Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
News From Across The Stans



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Obama Afghan escalation decision 'within days'
Washington (AFP) Nov 24, 2009
US President Barack Obama will announce a history-shaping decision "within days" on whether to escalate the war in Afghanistan with tens of thousands more troops, the White House said Tuesday. Aides declined to comment on news reports that Obama would use a prime-time speech Tuesday to unveil plans to try to turn the worsening conflict around by ordering some 34,000 more US soldiers to the ... read more







The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2009 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement