Subscribe to our free daily newsletters
. Military Space News .




Subscribe to our free daily newsletters



South Korea To Become Capable Of Deterring War On Peninsula

South Korean honor guards march in a parade marking the 58th anniversary of the Armed Forces Day in downtown Daejeon, 140 km (87 miles) south of Seoul, 01 October 2006. Photo courtesy of Jung Yeon-Je and AFP.
by Staff Writers
Gyeryongdae, South Korea (AFP) Oct 01, 2006
South Korean President Roh Moo-Hyun said Sunday his military would be capable of playing a leading role in deterring war on the Korean peninsula in the early part of the next decade. Roh's remarks came as Seoul tries to reshape its military alliance with Washington to regain wartime control over its armed forces and play a bigger role in countering North Korea, a self-declared nuclear power.

"We should build our self-defense capability to guarantee security for ourselves under any circumstances," Roh said, marking the 58th anniversary of the army's creation at military headquarters south of the capital Seoul.

"By the early 2010s, our military will have the capability to lead deterrence to war on the Korean peninsula."

Roh said the country would develop a "more efficient, strong and advanced elite" military, which could then play a "pivotal role in establishing peace in Northeast Asia" by 2020.

South Korea and the United States have finalized a plan to drastically revamp their alliance, which dates back to the 1950-1953 Korean War, to allow Seoul wartime operational control over its troops.

The "joint study" will be presented to this month's annual meeting of defence chiefs for approval, the defense ministry said last week.

Despite the change, both sides have said their mutual defense commitments would remain unaffected.

Some 29,500 US troops are stationed here to help 650,000 South Korean forces face up to North Korea's 1.2 million-strong army.

South Korea handed operational control over its own military to the US-led United Nations Command soon after the Korean War, sparked by an invasion from the communist North.

It regained peacetime control in 1994 but wartime control over Seoul's military remains in the hands of the top US commander here.

On Sunday, Roh said South Korea's alliance with the United States had been a "big help" in terms of developing the country's military.

"In the future, the South Korean-US alliance will continue to be a strong buttress of deterrence to war on the Korean peninsula and peace and stability in Northeast Asia," he said.

The South Korean defense ministry on Sunday announced a new arms buildup plan to supply another 100 ship-to-ship cruise missiles by 2010 and six more submarines by 2017 to the military.

The Seoul government wants to regain wartime control by 2012, citing national pride. The United States has proposed an earlier date of 2009.

The issue has split society, with conservative groups, veterans, intellectuals and others saying it will weaken defences against the North's nuclear and missile threat.

North Korea declared in February 2005 that it had built nuclear bombs. Six-nation talks aimed at dismantling its nuclear weapons have been stalled since the latest round in November.

The two Koreas are still technically in a state of war since the 1950-53 conflict ended with an armistice, not a peace treaty.

The United States wants to cut down on the current military presence in South Korea from 29,500 to 25,000 troops by 2008. It also wants flexibility to deploy them elsewhere in the region if necessary.

Source: Agence France-Presse

Related Links
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com

Inter-Korean Military Talks End Without Agreement
Seoul (AFP) Oct 02, 2006
Military officers from North and South Korea held talks Monday for the first time in almost five months but failed to agree on ways to ease tensions on the divided peninsula. The South's team said the communist state's July missile tests were not directly discussed but that it had raised the issue of heightened tensions in general.







  • Woes Of Worst Case Analysis Catch Out National Intelligence Estimate
  • Abe Ready To Go To China
  • Japanese Defense Chief Says Military Growth Of China A Threat
  • How Bush Strategy Failed Part Two

  • Inter-Korean Military Talks End Without Agreement
  • If And When Bush Iraqs Iran
  • Royal 'Surprised' By Fuss Over Brother's Role In Rainbow Warrior Sinking
  • South Korea To Become Capable Of Deterring War On Peninsula

  • BAE Systems Inertial Measurement Unit Selected For New Air-to-air Missile
  • South Korea Develops Cruise Missile
  • Norway Fires Its First Raytheon-Built Evolved SeaSparrow Missile
  • Australia Signs Contract For JASSM Follow On Standoff Weapon

  • Is Ballistic Missile Defense Worth The Money
  • South Korea Looks To Buy Second-Hand Missiles From Germany
  • Us In Final Stages Of Installing Missile Defense System In Japan
  • Compact Kinetic Energy Missile Test Successful

  • Democrats Question Wisdom of NASA Plans For Aeronautics Research Program
  • Lockheed Martin To Develop Fabrics For DARPA Stratospheric Airships
  • Air Safety Headache As Chinese Market Expands
  • European Aerospace Industry Set To Enter Russia

  • Intelligent Unmanned Aircraft Planned
  • Canada To Buy Thales mini-UAV System
  • UK To Buy MQ-9 Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
  • LM Selected To Develop FAA Road Map For Unmanned Aircraft Systems

  • Three Myths About Iraq
  • Iraq Casualties On The Rise
  • What Went Wrong In Iraq
  • Puffing On Iraq

  • Boeing Wins SDB I Focused Lethality Munition Contract
  • Iran To Mass Produce New Artillery Gun
  • Qinetiq Subsidiary's Precision Airdrop System Used By USAF In Afghanistan
  • Raytheon Projectile Scores a Direct Hit Against Moving T-72 Tank

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement