Subscribe free to our newsletters via your
. Military Space News .


Subscribe free to our newsletters via your




















Tank Technology Stuck In The 1940s Part Two

disclaimer: image is for illustration purposes only
by William S. Lind
Washington (UPI) May 8, 2008
The U.S. Army, which has only the most rudimentary understanding of operational art, has designed its tanks, especially the M-1 Abrams Main Battle Tank, for tactical utility with little thought for operational mobility.

This is typical of Second Generation War, French-model armies. The U.S. Abrams Main Battle Tank, which is built by General Dynamics, is essentially the latest version of the French Char B Main Battle Tank that was deployed before World War II.

In contrast, German and Soviet tanks were designed to serve a doctrine of operational mobility. Not many years ago a friend of mine was being shown over the German Leopard II tank by a German officer, who kept stressing the tank's wide tracks.

Puzzled, the American finally asked, "What's the big deal about wide tracks?" The German officer replied, "The Pripet marshes!" The Pripet marshes are a huge area of partially forested wetlands in what is now the former Soviet republic of Belarus.

Bruce Gudmundsson's valuable new book, "On Armor," concludes with an especially thoughtful discussion of the future of armor.

Gudmundsson writes, "At the beginning of the story, these two characteristics (operational mobility and combat power) are embodied in very different classes of vehicles. Light armored vehicles (initially armored cars and trucks) had operational mobility while tanks had combat power.

"In the middle of the story, which also coincides with the middle of the twentieth century, the two principle virtues of the armored vehicle are embodied in a single class of vehicle: an all-purpose tank such as the German Panzer III, the Soviet T-34, or the American Sherman.

"It was not long, however, before the two lines began to diverge again. By the end of the twentieth century, it was no longer possible to combine both operational mobility and first-class combat power in a single vehicle."

I am not sure it is no longer possible, and I would probably use the German Panzer IV with the long-barreled 75mm gun rather than the Panzer III as the German example, but Gudmundsson is correct about the divergence. The U.S. Marine Corps' wheeled Light Armored Vehicle was originally conceived as a way to give some Marine units operational mobility at a time when the M-1 Abrams was taking it away from tank battalions.

"On Armor" is a fine book, one that is essential to understand many of the developments in land warfare in the 20th century. Fourth Generation war renders much of the history that and nothing more; in 4G war conflicts, all tanks in effect become Sturmgeschutze.

Operational art is practiced on the mental and moral levels of war as great sweeps of armored formations deep in the enemy's rear become militarily meaningless.

But history remains important as a record of how people thought through the problems of earlier times. On Armor offers that history of armored warfare better than any other book on the subject.

(William S. Lind, expressing his own personal opinion, is director for the Center for Cultural Conservatism for the Free Congress Foundation.)

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
The latest in Military Technology for the 21st century at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


ITT's AIDEWS - International EW Countermeasures System Of Choice
White Plains NY (SPX) May 08, 2008
ITT's Advanced Integrated Defense Electronic Warfare System (AIDEWS) continues its role as a system of choice for international F-16 fighter aircraft. ITT Electronic Systems has been awarded a Foreign Military Sales contract of the ALQ-211(V)4 AIDEWS, for Pakistan Air Force F-16s, from Robins Air Force Base, Georgia.







  • NATO needs to work with, not against Russia: Moscow
  • US ambassador urges Japan to boost defence spending
  • Outside View: Russia at war -- Part 2
  • Walker's World: Building with BRICs

  • Israel has '150 or more' nuclear weapons: Carter
  • US finds scant progress in IAEA report on Iran: envoy
  • Iran still needs to explain weapons studies: IAEA
  • NKorea may hand over nuclear declaration this week: report

  • Iran mulls strengthening missile programme: report
  • India tests ballistic missile: official
  • Outside View: S-400 missile system delays
  • LaBarge Awarded Contract For Upgraded Missile Launch System

  • US seeking to overcome China, Russia missile defense objections
  • White House sees Russia 'open' to talks on US missile plan
  • Medvedev warns over US missile defence plans
  • Russian ABM Plans Part Two

  • China's new jumbo-jet firm no threat to Airbus, Boeing: state media
  • China unveils new jumbo jet company: report
  • NASA And JAXA To Conduct Joint Research On Sonic Boom Modeling
  • Analysis: Can airplanes go green?

  • AAI Shadow UAS Reaches 300000 Flight Hours
  • UN concludes Russia shot down Georgian spy plane
  • Northrop Grumman Showcases UAV Capabilities At Berlin ILA Air Show 2008
  • Boeing Flies A160T Hummingbird Unmanned Rotorcraft For 18 Hours

  • Analysis: Petraeus upbeat on Iraq
  • Bulgaria to move Iraq contingent to Baghdad
  • Petraeus may urge troop cutbacks in September
  • Bush: early Iraq withdrawal would be 'catastrophic'

  • BAE Wins Counter-IED Operations Support Contract
  • British Bulldog Helps Protect The Protectors
  • X-48B Blended Wing Body Flight Tests Enter 2nd Phase
  • iRobot Receives Orders For 200 More Infantry Robots

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement