Subscribe to our free daily newsletters
. Military Space News .

Subscribe to our free daily newsletters

Thompson Files: Missile defense realities

The U.S. Missile Defense Agency has been funding several programs that could intercept hostile missiles in boost or ascent phase. One is the Kinetic Energy Interceptor, an agile, high-acceleration system that can get close to launch sites because of its mobility.
by Loren B. Thompson
Arlington, Va. (UPI) Nov 4, 2008
With the U.S. economy facing the worst outlook in three generations, it isn't hard to figure out where the next administration -- whether it be the Obama or McCain administration -- will focus most of its attention.

What could be worse than credit markets collapsing just as baby boomers are about to retire? Well, here's something a lot worse: losing a million of those baby boomers, and their kids, in a nuclear attack.

That danger has been with us since the dawn of the nuclear age, but it grew worse over the last eight years as the Bush administration botched efforts to slow the spread of nuclear weapons. Because of its missteps in Iran, North Korea, Pakistan and elsewhere, we are facing a more diverse and unpredictable nuclear danger than ever before.

The nuclear threat was bigger during the Cold War, if you're just counting warheads, but it was also simpler back then because we didn't have to worry about unpredictable characters like Kim Jong Il, the leader of North Korea, and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the president of Iran. As long as Russia -- and later China -- was deterred by the threat of overwhelming retaliation, Americans could convince themselves that they were safe. Not now.

Who really understands the thought processes of Kim Il Sung's ne'er-do-well son, or the Islamic nationalists who one day might rule Pakistan? Even if they are rational -- which is assuming a lot, based on past behavior -- they still might be accident prone or given to miscalculation in assessing U.S. behavior. So deterrence the way U.S. governments used to practice it is a declining franchise, at least when it comes to the growing club of nuclear arrivistes popping up around the world.

This means there really is no alternative to missile defense, a conclusion the Clinton administration reached 10 years ago. And in that regard, there actually is some good news. The Bush administration has invested enough money in missile defense -- about 2 percent of the defense budget -- so that the new administration will inherit programs capable of defeating the kind of arsenals nuclear upstarts such as North Korea possess.

Some of these programs, like the missile-defense capabilities of Navy Aegis-class destroyers, are available on warfighting systems that serve a host of other missions too, making them real bargains. They are useless against an all-out Russian strategic attack, but they can cope with most of the other threats we face today.

The problem is tomorrow. U.S. intelligence has detected new kinds of threats, such as maneuvering warheads that will make it increasingly difficult to achieve interception once warheads have separated from rocket boosters and released penetration aids such as decoys.

Of course, critics of missile defense always predicted this would happen. But when the enemy is not deterrable, you still need a defensive response. That means hitting them early in their trajectory -- either before boosters cut off -- boost phase -- or between cutoff and warhead release -- ascent phase.

The U.S. Missile Defense Agency has been funding several programs that could intercept hostile missiles in boost or ascent phase. One is the Kinetic Energy Interceptor, an agile, high-acceleration system that can get close to launch sites because of its mobility.

Another is the Airborne Laser, which will be able to strike lofting missiles above the clouds at the speed of light using a laser from hundreds of miles away.

A third program is the Network Centric Airborne Defense Element, an inexpensive modification of the main air-to-air missile carried on U.S. fighters that could be ready to intercept enemy missiles by the end of the next president's first term in office.

Other options exist. The cost of these programs is so modest, and the threat to the United States from emerging nuclear actors is so great, that the new administration needs to figure out how to keep them going, regardless of what happens to the economy in the years ahead.

(Loren B. Thompson is chief executive officer of the Lexington Institute, an Arlington, Va.-based think tank that supports democracy and the free market.)

Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Share This Article With Planet Earth DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook

Related Links
Learn about missile defense at
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at
All about missiles at
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at

Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News

Bahrain in joint missile defence drill with US
Manama (AFP) Nov 4, 2008
The Bahraini air force is conducting a joint exercise in missile defence with units from the US Central Command, Bahrain's official BNA news agency reported on Tuesday.

  • Africa Command Headquarters To Remain In Stuttgart
  • A New Summit In Helsinki Part Two
  • Russian navy to hold war games in Indian Ocean
  • Analysis: Georgia leaves the CIS

  • Outside View: Russia boosts nuclear punch
  • Robert Gates Shows Nuclear Impatience
  • NKorea's nuclear drive seen dogging next US leader
  • New US president to maintain nuclear talks with NKorea

  • NKorean base could handle longer-range missile: SKorean minister
  • US Navy, Raytheon Achieve Program Milestone On JSOW C-1
  • Taiwan to produce 300 cruise missiles: report
  • LockMart's JASSM-ER Successful In Latest Flight Test

  • Bahrain in joint missile defence drill with US
  • Thompson Files: Missile defense realities
  • Russia Conducts CIS Wide Integrated Air Defense Exercise
  • US missile chief concerned by delays to Polish base accord

  • China plane-makers take first steps to rival global giants
  • Aviation giants look to China amid global turbulence
  • Boeing sees China buying 3,710 planes over next 20 years
  • New EU CO2 caps anger airlines

  • Aurora Wins USAF Contract On Vision-Based MAV Guidance
  • Successful Live-Fire Testing Of Shadow TUAS
  • DCNS Achieves Automatic UAV Landing On Frigate
  • AAI Receives Contract For Additional Shadow TUAS

  • Analysis: U.S., Iraq wrangle over troops
  • Outside View: Iraq-U.S. troop deal
  • No US bases in northern Iraq without Baghdad nod: Talabani
  • Only Iraqis who fled Gulf war suffer stress disorder: study

  • Eurofighter Air-to-Air Refuelling From Airbus A310 MRTT
  • Lockheed Martin Delivers 500th Arrowhead System To US Army
  • AESA And Other Developments Drive Radar Production
  • New Technology To Neutralise IEDs

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement