. Military Space News .

Top US military officer says Afghan drawdown risky
by Staff Writers
Washington (AFP) June 23, 2011

The top US military officer said Thursday that he endorsed President Barack Obama's Afghan withdrawal plan despite initial worries about the risks of "sacrificing fighting power in the middle of a war."

"More force for more time is, without a doubt, the safer course. But that does not necessarily make it the best course," US Joints Chiefs chairman Admiral Mike Mullen told the House Armed Services Committee.

"There is no jumping ship here. Quite the contrary. We will have at our disposal the great bulk of the surge forces through this -- and most of the next -- fighting season," Mullen said one day after Obama unveiled his strategy.

The president, facing a war-weary public as he chases re-election in 2012, announced Wednesday after consultations with his national security team that he was ordering all 33,000 US surge troops home from Afghanistan by next summer.

Mullen said he did not wish to discuss his "private advice" in the matter, but told lawmakers "the president's decisions are more aggressive and incur more risk than I was originally prepared to accept."

"Only the president, in the end, can really determine the acceptable level of risk we must take. I believe he has done so," he said.

Peppered with questions, Mullen said US commanders would have flexibility "inside the numbers and the dates" on the number and kind of troops who would go home and disputed claims US gains in the war were "easily reversible."

"I disagree that the gains will be easily reversed," said Mullen, who allowed that progress on the political and security fronts in Afghanistan only becomes "irreversible" if Afghans step up and take charge of their fate.

"The truth is, we would have run other kinds of risks by keeping more forces in Afghanistan longer," including Kabul's increased "dependency" on the US presence, he said.

"Let me be candid, however. No commander ever wants to sacrifice fighting power in the middle of a war. And no decision to demand that sacrifice is ever without risk," he warned.

The committee's chairman, Republican Representative Buck McKeon, said he was "deeply concerned" that Obama's approach endangered "hard-won" gains in a conflict sparked by the September 11, 2001 terrorist strikes.

"These gains are significant, we should guard them jealously," he said. "I am concerned that we will withdraw combat forces before they are able to cement recent gains."

But Undersecretary of Defense Michele Flournoy, appearing with Mullen, underlined to the committee that there would still be some 68,000 US troops in Afghanistan after some 33,000 return home by the end of next summer.

"That's more than twice the number as when President Obama took office. Clearly, this is not a 'rush to the exits' that will jeopardize our security gains," she said.

"We have earned this opportunity. Though not without risk, it is also not without its rewards. And so, we will take that risk, and we will reap those rewards," said Mullen.

Related Links
News From Across The Stans

Get Our Free Newsletters Via Email
Buy Advertising Editorial Enquiries

. Comment on this article via your Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail login.

Share this article via these popular social media networks
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit GoogleGoogle

Karzai hails US pullout but Taliban to fight on
Kabul (AFP) June 23, 2011
Afghanistan's Taliban Thursday dismissed news of US troop withdrawals as mere symbolism, vowing to fight on, but President Hamid Karzai said the move hastened his nation's ability to fend for itself. Ordinary Afghans seemed split over US President Barack Obama's announcement, after a decade of war, to pull tens of thousands of troops out of Afghanistan and concentrate on "nation-building" in ... read more

Raytheon to Upgrade Patriot for Saudi Arabia

Israelis brace for missiles, plan getaways

Raytheon to Provide Airborne Processing for Missile Defense Application

Romania summons Iran diplomat over missile shield comment

Raytheon Delivers Patriot GEM-T Test Missiles for UAE

NASAMS Live-Fire exercise a success

Iran to stage missile wargames from Monday

Raytheon Offers New Ground-Based Evolved SeaSparrow Missile

Helicopter lost over Libya is new US drone: officials

Thales completes flight demo for automatic landing of rotary wing UAVs

France and Britain to work on military drone: minister

Successful Flights for Skylark Operated by Dominator Unit

Network Integration Tests Aim to Reduce 'Fog of War'

Raytheon Receives US Navy Contract to Support Satellite Communication System

Firebird Uses Three Eyes and Fourth Sensor Payload

New military radio unveiled

Raytheon's Combat-Proven AESA Radars Continue to Set the Standard

US grounds fleet of F-22 fighter jets, indefinitely

Libyan rebels tool up in 'Mad Max' workshop

Sikorsky building CH-53K prototype

Committee praises Petraeus at CIA hearing

IAI, Airbus team up on AWACS lite

Lockheed ponders F-35 sale to India

Senate confirms Panetta to head Pentagon

Ukraine secretly ramps up ties with NATO: report

Ban gets new term in 'the most impossible job on Earth'

China seeks better military ties with India

India military delegation arrives in China

Raytheon Acquires Directed Energy Capabilities of Ktech Corporation

MLD Test Moves Navy A Step Closer To Lasers For Ship Self-Defense

US Navy And Northrop Grumman Accomplish Goals For At-Sea Demonstration Of Maritime Laser

Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily Express :: SpaceWar Express :: TerraDaily Express :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News

The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2011 - Space Media Network. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement