Subscribe to our free daily newsletters
. Military Space News .




Subscribe to our free daily newsletters



US-China Strategic Dialogue No Panacea

US Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson (L) shakes hands with Chinese President Hu Jintao during their meeting at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, 22 September 2006. Paulson was granted privileged access to China's two top leaders to press his case for the Asian giant to implement currency and other economic reforms. After taking a morning stroll around Beijing's famed Tiananmen Square, Paulson went into meetings with Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao and President Hu Jintao where he was welcomed as an "old friend". Photo courtesy of Elizabeth Dalziel and AFP.
by Staff Writers
Beijing (AFP) Sep 25, 2006
A new Sino-US "strategic economic dialogue," announced with much fanfare last week, should not be seen as a panacea for all problems in the troubled bilateral trade relationship, analysts say. The dialogue, unveiled while US Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson was given the red-carpet treatment in Beijing, could be short on tangible achievements, even Chinese economists admit.

"Although there may be no immediate, concrete results, the dialogue will serve as a platform for consultations between the two parties," said Mei Xinyu, an analyst with China's ministry of commerce.

"Neither side would like disputes to spin out of control, but prefer to aim for more rational, responsible and efficient consultations."

Meeting twice a year in the US and Chinese capitals, Paulson and Vice Premier Wu Yi will lead policymakers, including their presidents, in talks on longer-term issues.

An arrangement like this between the planet's largest developed and developing economies is long overdue in an ever more globalized world, Chinese state media have argued.

"The dialogue provides a needed platform for each country to grasp the other's priorities," the official China Daily said in an editorial.

"With such an understanding, it will be more likely that the two sides can work together to seek real solutions instead of allowing trade issues to be politicized," it said.

That may be difficult, since the top agenda item -- the value of the Chinese currency, the yuan -- has long since become a political issue in Washington.

Many US lawmakers argue that it is undervalued by as much as 40 percent against the dollar, giving an artificial boost to Chinese exports at the cost of millions of American factory jobs.

Without meaningful currency reform, the US Senate could well hold a vote this month on a bill that would slap a punitive tariff of 27.5 percent on all of China's US-bound goods.

This step could be increasingly difficult to avoid, but for the longer term, observers in Beijing hope that merely meeting on a more regular basis will remind the Americans that trade with China is not intrinsically bad.

"China hopes to use this dialogue to induce the Americans to maintain a basically positive attitude towards trade with China," said Xia Yeliang, an economist with Peking University.

"China is keen to persuade the Americans not to put up obstacles to Chinese exports despite their trade deficit."

That may be an important psychological gain, but observers argued talk alone is not enough to ensure the smooth operation of what is called the most important bilateral trade relationship in the world.

In fact, both Secretary Paulson and his Chinese counterparts know exactly what to do to counteract imbalances that affect not just the bilateral relationship, but the global economy as a whole.

"The US needs to save more and China needs to spend more," said Richard Bush, a Northeast Asia specialist at Washington's Brookings Institution. "But those steps require a lot of political will which may be hard to summon."

Some observers sensed a certain deja vu, pointing out that former deputy secretary of state Robert Zoellick was in charge of another "strategic" dialogue with China on foreign policy issues.

John Tkacik, a long-serving US diplomat in China who is now a research fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation in Washington, said Zoellick was unable to achieve much on any important issue from Darfur to Iran.

Now Zoellick is gone, but the Chinese line-up is basically intact. Which, some observers argued, may be part of the US problem.

"Beijing's top policy makers have been handling the American barbarians for decades (and) have been crossing swords with a steady succession of American negotiators for 20 years," Tkacik said. They're pro's, we're always fielding neophytes."

Source: Agence France-Presse

Related Links
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com

Mideast Woes Alarm Growing Number Of US Foreign Policy Analysts
Washington (UPI) Sep 21, 2006
Several prominent policy analysts warned this week that America's foreign policy had to be urgently re-evaluated to prevent wider disaster. The Bush administration should even consider evacuating its military forces from the Middle East, according to experts speaking a meeting of he Green Institute think tank Wednesday.







  • US-China Strategic Dialogue No Panacea
  • Mideast Woes Alarm Growing Number Of US Foreign Policy Analysts
  • Should Russia Claim Great Power Status
  • China Urges Abe To Properly Handle History

  • North Korea Losing Ground Militarily Says US Pacific Commander
  • Iran Warns Of Lightning Response To Any Attack
  • Blair Accused Of Stifling Nuclear Debate On ICBM Replacements
  • French Demonstrators Criticise French Nuclear Missile Tests

  • BAE Systems Inertial Measurement Unit Selected For New Air-to-air Missile
  • South Korea Develops Cruise Missile
  • Norway Fires Its First Raytheon-Built Evolved SeaSparrow Missile
  • Australia Signs Contract For JASSM Follow On Standoff Weapon

  • A Dream Month For Ballistic Missile Defense
  • US Navy Certifies Latest Version Of Aegis Missile Defense System
  • Raytheon-SAIC Team Selected For NATO Theater BMD Work
  • TEAMSAIC Selected For NATO Active Layered Theater BMD Support Contract

  • Air Safety Headache As Chinese Market Expands
  • European Aerospace Industry Set To Enter Russia
  • L-3 AVISYS Extends Its Civil Aircraft Self-Protection Systems Offerings
  • Fiber Optics Poised to Reach New Heights On Airplanes

  • Andaman Seeks Drones For Surveillance Of Tropical Archipelago
  • UAV Catches Anti-Iraqi Forces Mortar Team
  • Scientists Test Unmanned Aerial Systems Refueling
  • Reaper Moniker Given To MQ-9 Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

  • Thomas Hobbes Was Right Anarchy Does Not Work
  • Iraq Study A Long Way From Over
  • US Holds Iraqi Journalist For Five Months
  • US Commander Sees No Need To Ask For More Troops In Iraq

  • Mighty F-35 Lightning 2 Engine Roars To Life
  • Imaging Devices Drive Booming EO Systems Market
  • Northrop Grumman Gets Order For More Electronic Attack Systems
  • Raytheon-BAE Systems Bofors' Excalibur Closer to Fielding

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement