Subscribe to our free daily newsletters
. Military Space News .




Subscribe to our free daily newsletters



US Confusion Over Future Directions In Iran

An Israeli soldier salutes after placing the national flag on graves at the military cemetery on the Mount of Olive overlooking the Dome of the Rock mosque (background) in Jerusalem, 01 May 2006, to commemorate Israeli soldiers killed in wars since 1948. The Remembrance Day is followed immediately by the 58th anniversary of the creation of the state of Israel according to the Jewish calendar. At least 22,123 Israelis have been killed in combat or Arab attacks since 1860. Photo courtesy of Menahem Kahana and AFP.
by Arnaud De Borchgrave
UPI Editor-at-Large
Washington (UPI) May 09, 2006
A U.S. and/or Israeli air strike against Iran's nuclear facilities before November conjures up a dead duck rather than a lame one at one end of Pennsylvania Avenue and at the other, key Congressional committees under the control of prominent liberals. Charlie Rangel rewriting the tax code to penalize the rich and favor the disadvantaged?

Barney Frank, John Conyers and Henry Waxman chairing key committees? America's NATO allies siding with Russia and China in disassociating themselves from President Bush's decision to defang Iran's nuclear ambitions? This is what moderate Republicans can see in their viewfinders if the decision were made to decapitate Iran's nuclear ambitions before November's Congressional elections.

Yet conservative Republicans, as polled by NewsMax.com, a conservative web-based news service, show overwhelmingly strong support for bombing Iran. Almost 60,000 people took part in NewsMax's poll and 88 percent agreed Iran poses a greater threat than Saddam Hussein did before the Iraq War.

To the question "Should the U.S. undertake military action against Iran to stop their (nuclear) program?" 77 percent replied yes, 23 percent no.

Who should undertake military action against Iran first? The U.S. or Israel? 45 percent said the U.S., 35 percent Israel, and 20 percent said neither.

As for whether U.S. efforts to contain Iran's nuclear weapons are working, 93 percent said they weren't. And roughly the same number - 89 percent -- said the U.S. should not rely solely on the U.N.

All indications are that Israel does not plan to rely on either the U.N. or the U.S. Vice President Cheney said 18 months ago, "the Israelis may well decide to act first and let the rest of the world worry about cleaning up the diplomatic mess afterwards."

At Israel's National Day reception in Washington last week, an Israeli official, speaking privately and not for attribution said he believed Israel would strike first in the next "month or two or three" and that fighter bombers would not be involved as they were to take out Iraq's Osirak nuclear reactor before it went critical in 1981. For Osirak, Israel used fourteen F-15s and F-16s. This time, the Israeli said, it will be missiles. Cruise missiles, we inquired? No, he replied, with a gesture of his hand that went up and down again.

What about pinpointing tunnel entrances to widely scattered Iranian nuclear facilities, we asked? The Israeli responded Israel has its own geo-stationary spy-in-the-sky satellite taking constant pictures of Iran with a resolution down to 70 centimeters. "We know far more than anyone realizes," he said.

Israel has developed some 100 Jericho-II medium-range ballistic missiles (which entered service in 1989). Jericho II's range varies from 1,500 to 3,500 kilometers (930- 2100 miles), depending on payload weight. They are deployed in underground caves and silos.

Israel has several satellites in orbit -- Ofeq-1 through Ofeq-5 - that were launched by Shavit space launch vehicles (SLV). The first two stages of the Shavit were Jericho II missiles. There are unconfirmed reports of an upgraded Jericho-3 missile with a range of over 3,000 kilometers (1,800 miles).

For world opinion, rightly or wrongly, Israeli action against Iran could not take place without a green light from the White House. This wasn't the case when Israel vaporized Iraq's Osirak reactor June 7, 1981, at the height of the Iran-Iraq war. The Reagan White House said, "The U.S. government condemns the Israeli air strike...the unprecedented character of which cannot but seriously add to the already tense situation in the area." Most other countries denounced Israel. It was the world's first air strike against a nuclear plant.

Ten years later, then-Defense Secretary Cheney gave Israeli Air Force chief a satellite picture of the destroyed Osirak reactor inscribed, "For Gen. David Ivry, with thanks and appreciation for the outstanding job he did on the Iraqi Nuclear Program in 1981, which made our job much easier in Desert Storm."

Non-proliferation expert Joseph Cirincione reminds us the raid was also controversial in Israel. Half the cabinet was against bombing. The chief of IDF intelligence, Yehoshua Saguy, argued Israel should continue to seek a non-military solution as it would take Iraq five to 10 years to produce the material for a nuclear weapon. Prime Minister Menachem Begin finally opted for the worst-case estimate of one-year and gave the order to bomb.

Interestingly enough, the raid did not retard but actually speeded up Saddam Hussein's program. Iraqi scientists debriefed since Saddam was overthrown say he had planned to slowly divert plutonium from the reactor, which was under International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safeguards. The diversion plan, explain the specialists, might have escaped detection but would have taken even longer than the 10 years estimated by Seguy.

Following the Israeli raid, Saddam, now obsessed, launched a secret underground program with some 7,000 assigned to produce weapons-grade uranium. Even the 43 days of U.S. bombing of Iraq in Jan. and Feb. 1991, that preceded the liberation of Kuwait, did not destroy Saddam's hardened underground nuclear sites. That was achieved after the Gulf War -- by U.N. teams. Since the mid-1990s, there was nothing left to destroy. But Saddam kept on equivocating as he wanted Iran to believe he still had some nukes to discourage his rival from settling scores in his moment of weakness.

The strategic deception worked -- in Washington.

This time Iran has clearly signaled a casus belli to Israel. When President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad declares his intention to wipe Israel off the map and then goes to sea in a sieve by declaring the Holocaust never happened, it is hard to escape the conclusion he wants Israel to bomb Iran.

A religious fanatic who believes the return of the 12th imam to earth will be preceded by global death and destruction in his own lifetime, Ahmadinejad presumably sees an Israeli and/or U.S. attack against Iran closing Muslim ranks the world over against the imperialist infidels.

The State Department's top proliferation official said the administration is determined to ensure that "not one centrifuge spins in Iran." Israel is certainly poised to stop the spinning. Prime Minister Ehud Olmert called Ahmadinejad a "psychopath who speaks like Hitler before taking power." And Israel is not about to succumb to the appeasement of the 1930s.

Source: United Press International

Related Links
-

Iran Letter Does Not Change US Position
Washington (AFP) May 09, 2006
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's letter to US President George W. Bush does not change Washington's position on Tehran's nuclear program, a White House official said Monday. "Nothing in the letter addresses the issues between Iran and the international community," said Frederick Jones, a spokesman for the National Security Council.







  • Koizumi Calls For Japan And US To Update Military Ties
  • Bush's Charm Offensive
  • US Strategy On Ukraine
  • Japan Aims To Revamp Rules For Military Cooperation With US

  • US Confusion Over Future Directions In Iran
  • Iran's Grand Bargain
  • Iran Letter Does Not Change US Position
  • US War Doctrine And Iran

  • US Air Force Studies German Fuse For Cruise Missile
  • Pakistan Test Fires Long-Range Nuclear Capable Missile
  • MBDA And Raytheon Offer Anti-Aircraft Missiles For Estonia
  • Raytheon Awarded Contract For Patriot Upgrades

  • Lockheed Martin Receives $379M Contract For PAC-3 Missile Production
  • Koizumi's BMD Legacy
  • Canadian Prime Minister Harper Defies Ballistic Missile Defense Critics
  • LM Delivers Components For Missile Warning Satellite

  • Test Pilot Crossfield Killed In Private Plane Crash
  • Aerospace Industry Slow To Embrace New MEMS Technologies
  • BAE Systems To Sell Airbus Stake, EADS Likely Buyers
  • DaimlerChrysler And Lagardere Cut Stake In EADS

  • AAI Receives Order For Nine Additional Shadow 200 Tactical UAVs
  • Boeing Phantom Works to Lead Research On X-48B Blended Wing Body Concept
  • Aerosonde Mk4 UAV Sets New Endurance Mark
  • AVID Developing New UAV Concept For Homeland Security

  • Many Cooks Spoiling Iraq's Broth
  • Pentagon Halts Deployment Of 3,500 Troops To Iraq
  • Impact Of A Quick Pullout From Iraq
  • Problems For The Anti-War Coalition

  • Mine Area Clearance Vehicle Converts For Remote Operations
  • Navy EOD Expanding, Needs Recruits
  • New Armored Infantry Fighting Vehicle PUMA Presented
  • NGC Successfully Demonstrates S-Band AESA Radar Capability

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement