Santander, Spain (UPI) Nov 8, 2010
U.S. President Barack Obama is in for a busy 48 hours in Lisbon, Portugal, at the end of this month. He has a NATO summit, a Russian summit, an Afghan summit and a European summit all in instant succession.
The NATO summit may be fruitful, although any goodwill generated by agreement on a new strategic concept for the venerable alliance could well be overshadowed by arguments and divisions over Afghanistan. The 3,000 Canadians and Dutch are leaving, the British are drawing down on their force of 9,500 and the French last week said they want their 3,500 troops out next year before President Nicolas Sarkozy faces his voters again in 2012.
Obama only has himself to blame. According to Bob Woodard's well-sourced book on the Afghan decision, it was the president who decided that July of next year was to be some kind of deadline for this war he chose to pursue. No surprise, therefore, that the NATO allies who were never exactly enthusiastic for the Afghan expedition penciled in the same sell-by date into their generals' diaries.
The NATO summit was meant to be about much more than that. First, it was about the new strategic concept, which U.S. Ambassador to NATO Ivo Daalder says should be seen as NATO 3.0 -- a trendy, information-era term that military men might prefer to describe as NATO Mark 3.
NATO Mark 1 was the traditional alliance as it existed throughout the Cold War, the collective defense of 15 nations against the threat of Soviet aggression. And very successful it turned out to be, prevailing in that decades-long contest without firing a shot, albeit at great expense with conscript armies and armored divisions, fleets of warplanes and navies.
NATO Mark 2 was the alliance between the end of the Cold War in 1989 and the present, a period when the fruits of the not-quite conflict were gathered. The Eastern European orphans of Stalin's wretched empire were gathered safely into the arms of the West, with Czechs and Slovaks, Latvians and Estonians, Poles and Hungarians, Romanians and Bulgarians and others all nestling in the arms of NATO and the European Union.
But at the same time, NATO finally got to fight in the tragic Balkan wars over Bosnia and Kosovo, the Luftwaffe and the Royal Air Force finally dropping bombs and flying combat patrols in the same cause. The fruits of that conflict remain elusive. One former Yugoslav province, now the tiny but independent state of Slovenia, has joined NATO and the euro and another, Croatia, may be joining the European Union within the year.
Serbia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Montenegro, Kosovo and Macedonia remain problematic, all yearning to be absorbed into the NATO-EU double embrace but too poor, too corrupt and too unstable to have any early hopes of qualifying.
The EU has learned its lesson from Romania and Bulgaria, two countries that were accepted into the union before their civil service and their civil societies, their economies and their judicial systems were really ready. They remain worryingly corrupt, ranked down with China and Mexico in Transparency International's latest corruption index.
So that mixed success of NATO Mark 2 brings us to the new NATO Mark 3, which is meant to adapt the alliance for operating in a globalised world, in which security is as much about cyberspace as airspace, and more concerned with terrorism and bio-warfare and organized crime than with the Soviet Union's famed Spetznatz special forces.
"The foundation of the new NATO is the community of shared values and on that foundation stand two pillars; collective defense and cooperative security," Daalder says.
Along with the familiar benefits of NATO in common operating procedures and command systems, NATO Mark 3 will find itself forging links with new partners in the Middle East and South Asia and Africa as its navies mount anti-piracy patrols off Somalia and 140,000 troops in the International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan. The majority of them, some 90,000, are American, although most other NATO members have at least a small presence. Luxembourg, for example, has nine soldiers there.
There is big controversy in most NATO-member countries about the mission and whether the Afghan state of President Hamid Karzai is worth the effort, after the latest reports of bags of Iranian cash being delivered to his office. Daalder, like most of the military commanders, says the Afghan security forces are improving steadily and should be in a position from next year to take over more and more of the security mission.
"All that we know says we are moving in the right direction," Daalder explains. "We can see the corner and peek around it."
Maybe, but the pressure to withdraw or scale down their commitment is growing on most of the ISAF member governments and Obama may be left holding the baby almost alone after next July.
However satisfactory the brief summit with the Russians and Europeans may turn out to be, and whatever long-term progress is made on defining NATO Mark 3, the alliance and the U.S. president are going to be judged by the fate of an Afghan mission. And the NATO members know it cannot end in military victory and aren't even sure what would constitute success.
Share This Article With Planet Earth
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com
US urges growing China to be 'responsible player'
Melbourne (AFP) Nov 8, 2010
The United States Monday urged China to be a "responsible player" as its global influence grows and stressed its commitment to Asia after security talks with Australia during a regional diplomatic push. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made the comment after meeting Australian officials alongside US Defence Secretary Robert Gates, in talks which produced an agreement to cooperate on securi ... read more
NATO Defense Shield In Turkey May Threaten Iran, Russia|
Israel halts missile shield deployment
Video Captures ABM Capabilities Of Distributed Aperture System For F-35
Orbital Launches MRT For Joint US/Japan Missile Defense Test
Pentagon says vapor trail from an aircraft, not a missile
Iran to test own S-300 missiles despite Russia: commander
Taiwan arrests double agent spying for China
Taiwan missile to target Chinese air bases, ports: report
US drone strikes kill nine militants in Pakistan
LM TRACER Begins Test Flights Aboard Predator B MQ-9 UAS
US Army Plans Large Manned-Unmanned Demo
Three US drone strikes kill 11 militants in Pakistan
ManTech Awarded US Army Contract To Provide ECCS In Afghanistan
Hughes Undergoing Wideband Global SATCOM Certification
ORBIT To Supply Tri-Band Telemetry Tracking Systems To Patuxent River USNAWC
Raytheon To Provide Improved Track Correlation And Fusion Capability
Display System Concept For Elbit Systems Mission Training Center Approved
Northrop Grumman's LEMV Program Completes Three Major Milestones
Europe tests amphibious military capacity in Senegal
Global talks in Laos seek quicker removal of cluster bombs
Russia confirms 2011 defense spending hike
Combat aircraft top international arms sales: think tank
Thales confirms 2010 targets after strong third quarter
U.S. arms deal raises concerns in Mideast
Ex-Chinese leader doesn't 'trust' Bible: Bush
Walker's World: Planning NATO Mark 3
Obama hails ties with 'world power' India
US urges growing China to be 'responsible player'
Boeing Installing Beam Control System On HEL Laser Demonstrator
Maritime Laser System Shows Higher Lethality At Longer Ranges
Northrop Grumman To Increase Efficiency For Next-Gen Military Laser Technology
Boeing Receives Task Order For Design Of Free Electron Laser Lab Demonstrator
|The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2010 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement|