Subscribe to our free daily newsletters
. Military Space News .

Subscribe to our free daily newsletters

What Motivates Iran And Russia On The S-300 Deal Part Two

disclaimer: image is for illustration purposes only
by Martin Sieff
Washington (UPI) Dec 29, 2008
How should one interpret the conflicting messages coming out of Moscow and Tehran last week about over whether Russia has sent S-300 air defense system components to Iran?

First, a senior Iranian parliamentarian, Esmaeil Kosari, deputy chairman of the Iranian Parliament's Commission on National Security and Foreign Policy, informed Iran's official Islamic Republic News Agency on Dec. 20 that after years of talks, Russian had agreed to deliver to Iran the S-300 system's components. He stated that Iran would initially base the S-300 system around its borders.

The U.S. government took the claim seriously and protested to Moscow. U.S. officials privately said they had independent intelligence that Kosari was speaking the truth.

However, on Thursday, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov told a news conference in Moscow that Russia had not sent those S-300 components to Iran. He flatly denied the allegations.

Also, the government of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, which has been all too happy to exaggerate its capabilities to defend the country against any U.S. airstrikes, remained silent throughout the controversy and certainly took no steps to confirm or deny Kosari's claims.

At first glance, it would appear that Kosari deliberately exaggerated and that the Russians were telling the truth when they said the crucial S-300 components had not been sent. The Kremlin has been sending out a series of dovish signals to the incoming Obama administration that it wants to improve relations with Washington and to negotiate a new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty to replace the 1991 START-1 treaty that runs out a year from now in December 2009.

Also, Russian policymakers are hopeful that incoming U.S. President-elect Barack Obama and his designated Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will be ready to scrap the Bush administration's plans to build two anti-ballistic missiles bases in Central Europe -- one in Poland armed with 10 Ground-based Mid-course Interceptors and the other in the neighboring Czech Republic with an advanced radar array to guide the missiles on to their targets.

The stated purpose of these two bases is to defend the United States and Western Europe from the threat of future nuclear-armed Iranian intercontinental ballistic missiles. But the Russians insist the bases are really aimed at them and the survivable second-strike capabilities of their own nuclear missile forces.

It would therefore be reckless in the extreme for the Russians to endanger their prime strategic goals of negotiating a START-2 treaty and getting a peaceful agreement to scrap the planned BMD bases in Central Europe by sending those S-300 components to Iran now.

However, governments often make unexpected, rash, or self-defeating decisions for a whole host of reasons. And Russia has already supplied Iran with billions of dollars worth of nuclear technology and the engineers and technicians to build the Iranian nuclear reactor complex at Bushehr. Russia, as we have documented previously in these columns, has also already sold other advanced anti-ballistic missile and anti-aircraft defense systems to Iran: 29 Tor-M1s.

The Tor-M1s are roughly equivalent to the U.S. Patriot PAC-3 in being short-range systems especially against low-flying incoming threats like cruise missiles. But the S-300 system is designed to defend against both low-altitude and high-altitude aircraft, cruise missiles and intermediate-range ballistic missiles at longer distances of up to 100 miles. The two systems compliment each other, much as the U.S. Army's Patriot and the U.S. Navy's Standard Missile-3 do.

It is of course possible that the Russian government wants to take advantage of the interregnum between the outgoing lame duck Bush administration and the incoming Obama administration to rush through a fait accompli in delivering the S-300 to Iran in the belief that the new president's passion for arms control will lead him to turn a blind eye to the deal.

That passion to negotiate a new START treaty and to scrap the planned BMD bases in Central Europe is shared throughout the Democratic Party's foreign policy and national security establishment that will be taking over the top jobs at the Pentagon, the State Department and the National Security Council.

But if the Russians are indeed telling the truth, then why did Kosari claim that the S-300 components had been delivered when they had not been?

(Next: Revealing Iran's strategy)

Share This Article With Planet Earth DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook

Related Links
Learn about missile defense at
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at
All about missiles at
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at

Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News

BMD Focus: Russia's S-300s boost Iran
Washington (UPI) Dec 23, 2008
A leading Iranian parliamentarian claimed Sunday that Russia had begun to send sections of its S-300 anti-aircraft and anti-missile defense system to Iran.

  • Vaclav Klaus, Czech president turned 'European dissident'
  • US Navy frigate arrives in Georgian port: embassy
  • 50 years of intrigue in US-Cuba ties
  • Russia optimistic on US ties under Obama: deputy minister

  • NKorea's first foreign university delayed by politics: fund-raisers
  • US signs protocol boosting nuclear monitoring
  • BMD Focus: Bulava fails again
  • Book: Soviets stole H-bomb secrets

  • Russian Military Confirms 13 Strategic Missile Launches For 2009
  • Russia selling surface-to-air missiles to Libya, Syria: report
  • Lebanese army finds seven missiles pointed at Israel
  • Russia denies delivering S-300 missiles to Iran

  • Moscow Says Offer To On Joint Radar Use Still Stands
  • What Motivates Iran And Russia On The S-300 Deal Part Two
  • Atlantic Eye: Lockerbie to missile defense
  • The S-300 Mystery Deepens Part One

  • China Eastern says bailout increased to one billion dollars
  • Britain's environment minister concerned by Heathrow plan
  • Climate protesters cause chaos at British airport
  • Thompson Files: Protect U.S. aerospace

  • Skylark 1 LE Selected By Israeli Ministry Of Defense
  • Russia mulls unprecedented Israel drones purchase
  • Raven UAS Certified By Italian Ministry Of Defense
  • Navy Targets Unmanned Aircraft

  • Iraq signs military accords with Britain, Australia
  • Hunting For Iraqi Weapons Part One
  • Feature: Iraq's milestone for new year
  • Expiry of UN mandate major step to Iraqi sovereignty

  • Analysis: U.S. needs for language critical
  • Boeing Begins Final Assembly Of RAAF FA-18F Super Hornets
  • Docs to learn battlefield acupuncture
  • Dutch ministry favours Joint Strike Fighter

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement