![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
. | ![]() |
. |
![]() by Staff Writers for Launchspace Bethesda MD (SPX) Jan 15, 2021
Many think the idea of a military crewed space station is new. It is not. The Russian Almaz ("Diamond") was a highly secret Soviet military space station program that began in the early 1960s. In fact, three crewed military reconnaissance stations were launched between 1973 and 1976. These were referred to as Salyut 2, Salyut 3 and Salyut 5. To camouflage their real mission the three stations were designated as civilian Salyut space stations. As it happens, Salyut 2 failed shortly after achieving orbit, but Salyut 3 and Salyut 5 conducted successful crewed testing. However, the results convinced the Soviet Defense Ministry that this approach was too expensive. In 1978, Almaz was discontinued. The U.S. also pursued a military crewed station known as the Manned Orbiting Laboratory (MOL), also in the 1960s. This was part of the U. S. Air Force human spaceflight program at the time. The project was to develop a reconnaissance spacecraft that had a single use in which crews would stay for 30 days at a time. The MOL program was publicly announced as an inhabited platform to demonstrate the utility of putting people in space for military missions. Seventeen astronauts were selected for the program and Vandenberg Air Force Base's Space Launch Complex 6 (SLC 6) was developed to permit launches into polar orbits. However, in the late 1960s funds for MOL were reduced in favor of the Vietman War and the program was cancelled in 1969. Today, we have excellent robotic reconnaissance satellites that can collect data from anywhere on the Earth's surface. However, a primary mission of the U.S. Space Force must be the implementation of "space control", the protection of orbiting U.S. national security assets. This is now a most pressing issue due to recent developments by other spacefaring nations that are aggressively testing the willingness of the U.S. to defend its national security assets. Near-Earth space is already highly congested and contested. Russian and China have been developing offensive weapons that can surveil and attack spacecraft in orbit. Such activities cannot be ignored. However, the defense of orbiting assets is very challenging and complex. Ground-based deterrent methods are quite limited. This brings us to the question: "Is it time to revisit the use of crewed military space stations?" We don't yet know the answer, but we can speculate on the possibilities. Recent technology advances have resulted in the idea that such stations may best be utilized in orbits over the Earth's equator and at altitudes that coincide with those used for military operations. For example, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) satellites are typically at altitude below 1000 km. Military astronauts in equatorial space stations can frequently observe all such satellites as they cross the equatorial plane, since all low-orbit satellites must pass through the equatorial plane every 50 minutes. In fact, such space stations could see everything in low orbits over 28 times per day. Equatorial spacecraft have several other advantages. All maneuvers would be two-dimensional, requiring minimal usage of thrusting propellant. Servicing, refueling and crew changes could be done without launch window constraints. However, launch sites would be limited to equatorial locations for maximum payload efficiency. Nevertheless, this concept could evolve into a permanent deterrent to in-space aggression.
![]() ![]() DNI Ratcliffe welcomes US Space Force as 18th Intelligence Community Member Washington DC (AFNS) Jan 12, 2021 Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe has welcomed the U.S. Space Force (USSF) as the 18th member of the U.S. Intelligence Community (IC). During an afternoon ceremony, Ratcliffe and Chief of Space Operations Gen. John W. "Jay" Raymond announced the designation of the intelligence element of the U.S. Space Force as a member of the IC. "This accession reaffirms our commitment to securing outer space as a safe and free domain for America's interests," said Ratcliffe. "American power ... read more
![]() |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |