Subscribe to our free daily newsletters
. Military Space News .




Subscribe to our free daily newsletters



A Recipe For Greater Disaster

"On the contrary, it is the same "staying the course" strategy only camouflaged. It is a recipe for increasing American casualties, widening the sectarian gulf, intensifying the insurgency, strengthening Iran's position, and bringing Iraq to the precipice of hell."
by Alon Ben-Meir
Washington (UPI) Jan 15, 2007
Since President Bush unveiled his "new strategy" for Iraq the debate in the House, the Senate, and the media has centered around two main options: immediate withdrawal or an escalation of troop levels. If either is pursued, it will precipitate an even greater disaster in Iraq than the existing situation. Sadly, the president simply does not get the consequences of escalation, while the Democrats seem clueless about those of a hasty withdrawal. The reality is that there is no military solution, but the United States also cannot leave the Iraqis to their own devices having brought them to this sorry state.

The first option, advocated by many leading Democrats, calls for the gradual withdrawal of U.S. forces (within 18 months) as increasing numbers of Iraqi security personnel are trained and thus become capable of taking over from the Americans.

This option ignores three realities: a) Iraqi security forces are not anywhere near being able to secure the nation because of logistical constraints and the time needed for training, b) they are infested with Shiite militias that spearhead much of the sectarian killings, and c) the Shiite community is not committed to a pluralistic Iraq and will insist on absolute majority Shiite rule while marginalizing the Sunnis.

Thus, the critics of this option would be right to argue that withdrawing American forces, without leaving behind a politically functioning state, will be catastrophic to Iraq and the region: It will certainly lead to anarchy, all-out civil war, and Iraq's eventual disintegration. It could further plunge the entire region into violent turmoil with unforeseen consequences and severely damage America's global standing.

The president's option, increasing American combat troops by more than 21,000, is even more reckless; it will not change the dynamic of the war and is bound to usher in a greater disaster. Continuing at this stage to rely on a military option will prove to be this administration's greatest blunder since the start of war four years ago. This is not a war against terrorism as the president wishes to label it; in fact, this war promotes terrorism in both Iraq and the region. Rather, this is a war against an insurgency which, committed to violently resisting American occupation and has the staying power to outlast U.S. presence. Moreover, this is a civil war between Shiite and Sunnis, which many on both sides see as a war to the finish because for them survival itself is at stake.

And the president's plan relies heavily on the Iraqi government to assume a larger responsibility in fighting the insurgency and ending the sectarian killings, requirements the al-Maliki government has thus far failed to meet. Nothing suggests that this can or will change. More American troops policing Baghdad will show some temporary, but misleading, signs of success. For, in the face of overwhelming U.S. power, the insurgents will simply melt away into their communities only to rise again with even greater vehemence, while the Shiite death squads will lie-in-wait for the Americans to ease the pressure or leave altogether. Prime Minister al-Maliki is neither interested in, nor capable of, ending the sectarian mayhem. He is weak, presides over a dysfunctional government, and relies heavily on Shiite militias (the Mahdi Army and other affiliated groups) to stay in power. What Bush offered then is not a strategy that will stabilize Iraq and lead to a secure, democratic government that can bring normalcy to the Iraqi people. On the contrary, it is the same "staying the course" strategy only camouflaged. It is a recipe for increasing American casualties, widening the sectarian gulf, intensifying the insurgency, strengthening Iran's position, and bringing Iraq to the precipice of hell.

The administration must seek instead a political solution, while it still has the leverage -- a solution that addresses the root causes of Iraq's internal struggle precipitated by the American invasion. This is why the United States is responsible for what happens in Iraq once American troops are withdrawn: No political solution will work, however, unless Washington provides the Sunnis with the political and the military support they require to govern and protect them. Having lost power with no hope to regain it, a permanent political solution lies, at a minimum, in Sunnis' self-rule over their three provinces. For this to work, the United States must insist on, 1) the passage of a basic federal law providing for equitable distribution of oil revenues and the creation of a federal agency in charge of oil exploring, developing, marketing and selling, 2) a declaration of amnesty to all insurgents, 3) the providing of economic and military support to the new Iraqi Sunni entity, 4) a commitment by the three main factions to a loose federal system (provided for by the Iraqi constitution) with each sect governing its internal affairs as it sees fit, and 5) the creation by each sect of its own security forces for self-protection (as the Kurds and the Shiites already have), alongside of proportionate contributions to a national army for defending the nation from outside threat.

If President Bush moves with determination -- something he has shown he can do -- and temporarily increases troop levels in pursuing this third option, he may well succeed in accomplishing what has thus far eluded him. He will save Iraq from an all out civil war and disintegration and America from humiliating defeat.

(Alon Ben-Meir is professor of international relations and Middle Eastern studies at the Center for Global Affairs at NYU. alon@alonben-meir.com)

Source: United Press International

Related Links
Iraq: The first techonology war of the 21st century

Assessing The Bush Strategy Version 2007
Moscow (UPI) Jan 15, 2007
President George W. Bush has finally come up with his long-awaited new strategy for Iraq. In a way, it may be a prelude to the new U.S. strategy in the Middle East as a whole. However, Bush has not said anything really new, at least, as far as Iraq is concerned. The change has affected tactics rather than strategy.







  • Japan Mulls Expanded Weapons Use For Overseas Troops
  • Assuring Vital Interests Drives US Space Policy
  • Japan Launches First Defense Ministry Since WWII
  • Schmoozing At the White House

  • Most Britons Want International Deal Banning All Nuclear Weapons
  • US Defends Gulf Buildup, Calls Iran Actions 'Very Negative'
  • Lockheed Martin And ATK Demonstrate Complete Booster System For Submarine Intermediate Range Missiles
  • Asian Nations Urge North Korea On Kidnap Victims, Food Shortages

  • Pakistan Chooses Raytheon's Proven Air Defense Missiles To Secure Borders
  • General Dynamics Awarded $425M For Missile Systems By Spanish Army
  • Raytheon Receives Contracts For Standard Missile-1 Support Services
  • Javelin Block I Missile Achieves Success In Test Firings

  • Missile Defense Really Does Take Rocket Science
  • Banner Year For US Missile Defense Plans
  • Raytheon Awarded Subcontract for Sea-Based X-Band Radar Sustainment Support
  • Raytheon Completes Negotiations Billion Dollar Contract For JLENS Development

  • USGS Examines Environmental Impacts Of Aircraft De-Icers
  • China Gives Rare Glimpse Of Homegrown Jet Fighter
  • IATA Gives Cautious Welcome To EU Emissions Trading Plan
  • EU Proposes CO2 Emission Quotas For Airlines

  • Enhanced Fire Scout Makes Flight Debut
  • Israel Developing Massive New Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
  • Boeing Provides ScanEagle UAV to Australian Army
  • Techsphere Structures Licensing Agreement With Global Skyship Industries

  • A Recipe For Greater Disaster
  • Assessing The Bush Strategy Version 2007
  • Looking Ahead In Iraq
  • An Admiral For Iraq

  • Pentagon Report Warns Canadian Coins Bugged
  • Raytheon Wins Silent Knight Radar Development Contract
  • Recon Optical Awarded Contract For Stabilized Remotely Operated Weapon Systems
  • Northrop Grumman Airborne Signals Intelligence Payload Takes To Air On First U-2 Flight

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement