Subscribe free to our newsletters via your
. Military Space News .


Subscribe free to our newsletters via your




















Army Still Using Physicians In Interrogation

According to Marks, who is also a barrister and an academic member of Matrix Chambers, London, the Army is trying to provide rationales to justify the participation of physicians in interrogation. It is seeking to persuade psychiatrists that there is still a good reason for their involvement, despite the positions adopted by the professional associations.
by Staff Writers
University Park PA (SPX) Sep 12, 2008
U.S. Army psychiatrists may be participating in the interrogation of detainees, while ignoring recommendations to the contrary from professional medical associations, according to a Penn State bioethicist and a Georgetown University law professor.

"The American Psychiatric Association (APA) and the American Medical Association (AMA) adopted positions in 2006 that basically said physicians should not be directly involved in any interrogation of any individual," said Jonathan Marks, associate professor of bioethics, humanities and law, and acting director of the Rock Ethics Institute.

"According to them this is not what physicians should be doing, whether the interrogation is aggressive or not, or legal or not."

Yet documents recently provided to Marks and M. Gregg Bloche, professor of law, Georgetown University Law Center, by the U.S. Army in response to requests under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) reveal that the Department of Defense still wants physicians to be involved in interrogations and continues to resist the positions taken by the professional medical associations.

In an essay in the Sept. 11 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, Marks and Bloche, both co-applicants in the FOIA request, point out that an October 2006 Army memo, known as the Behavioral Science Consultation Memo, seeks to undermine the positions of the two associations and tries to carve out a role for psychiatrists advising interrogators on individual interrogations.

"The Army is essentially telling physicians that during interrogations they are not acting as a health care provider but as a behavioral science advisor," Marks explained.

"The memo goes a step further and suggests that monitoring might actually be helpful in preventing detainees from getting hurt."

According to Marks, who is also a barrister and an academic member of Matrix Chambers, London, the Army is trying to provide rationales to justify the participation of physicians in interrogation.

It is seeking to persuade psychiatrists that there is still a good reason for their involvement, despite the positions adopted by the professional associations.

Other documents provided in response to the FOIA requests also indicate that, as of October 2007, at least five psychiatrists had undergone training as behavioral science consultants after the AMA and APA adopted their restrictive policies.

The Department of Defense memo expires on October 20, 2008, and while its fate is unclear, the government should not renew it, say Marks and Bloche, also adjunct professor, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, and nonresident senior fellow, Brookings Institution.

"There are problems with this memo. If they do revise it, they should embrace the position of the AMA and the APA, instead of trying to persuade physicians to ignore their policies," added Marks.

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
Penn State
The Long War - Doctrine and Application



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Analysis: Watchlist flaws recounted
Washington (UPI) Sep 9, 2008
A House committee Tuesday heard from an unusual witness -- an 8-year-old boy whose name appears on the U.S. government's terrorist watchlist.







  • Military Matters: Baltic defense realities
  • Analysis: EU works on detente with Russia
  • Outside View: Russia-NATO split -- Part Two
  • Russian Nuke Cruise In Venezuela Manoeuvres As US Watches

  • Outside View: Will terrorists go nuclear?
  • SKorea on alert for NKorea shift after Kim's stroke
  • Five arrested for alleged 'uranium' smuggling, say police
  • Russian planes in Venezuela a warning to US: Chavez

  • NZ Navy And Air Force Test Fire Missile
  • US Navy Conducts Second Test Of Raytheon's Standard Missile-6
  • Diehl Signs Contract With SENER For IRIS-T Surface-to-Air Missile
  • Lockheed Martin Receives Contract For Guided MLRS Unitary Rockets

  • Lavrov accuses US of trying to encircle Russia with shield
  • Obama says missile shield cannot target Russia: Poland's Sikorski
  • Anti Missile Showdown Building Between East And West
  • Outside View: BMD blowback -- Part Two

  • Safer Skies For The Flying Public
  • Chinese airlines fly into headwinds in Olympic year
  • The M2-F1 - An Aircraft Without Wings
  • China's Tianjin building runway for Airbus test flights: report

  • Virtual Reality Project Could Improve UAV Operations
  • Elbit Systems' Hermes 450 Records Another Success
  • Industrial 6-Rotor Unmanned Helicopter Provides HighDef Video And Imaging
  • Robotic helicopters teach themselves

  • Feature: Sept. 11 cop trains Iraqi police
  • Thompson Files: Obama, McCain back 'Rummy'
  • US now in the 'end game' in Iraq: Gates
  • Bush to unveil Iraq troop decision Tuesday

  • Russian Navy To Receive 4 New Amphibious Planes By 2013
  • Boeing ABL Team Begin Firing High-Energy Laser
  • GD Awarded Contract For M1A1 Abrams Tank Upgrades
  • ITT's FRCS Achieves No-Jam Success At Exercise Red Flag

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement