Subscribe to our free daily newsletters
. Military Space News .

Subscribe to our free daily newsletters

Outside View: Obama should back KEI

US defends missile defense plan
The United States reaffirmed Tuesday that its missile defense plan does not target Russia after Moscow said it would not put missiles on the European Union's doorstep if Washington forgoes the shield. "Missile defense is designed to protect all of us from launches from rogue states. We will continue to make that clear to the Russians," White House spokesman Gordon Johndroe told AFP. He spoke after Russian Foreign Sergei Lavrov said Tuesday that Moscow would drop plans to put missiles in Kaliningrad if Washington halts its missile shield initiatives. "We have said through the voice of our president that if the third zone of positioning of the US anti-missile shield is created, one of the measures to neutralize the threats to Russia's security that would inevitably arise will be the deployment of Iskander systems in the Kaliningrad region," he said. The missiles will be deployed "only if the third zone of positioning really takes shape," Lavrov told reporters. President Dmitry Medvedev announced the move to deploy Iskander missiles in Kaliningrad, a Russian territory between Poland and Lithuania, last Wednesday. He said the deployment would counter a US anti-missile system to be based in Poland and the Czech Republic by 2013-2014, sounding a warning shot to US president-elect Barack Obama and Washington's allies in central Europe.
by Daniel Goure
Arlington, Va. (UPI) Nov 11, 2008
U.S. Vice President-elect Joe Biden was wrong when he said, "It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy." Well, it was more like six hours.

The day after the election, as other world leaders were sending the U.S. president-elect congratulatory messages, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev apparently thought that a hostile theme was more appropriate. In his first state of the union address, Medvedev threatened to deploy short-range missiles against Poland if a missile defense system, the so-called Third Site, were deployed in that Eastern European country. The Russian president went on to list other hostile steps his country might take, including electronically jamming the missile defense.

It is ironic that President-elect Obama's first test should be about missile defenses. He has expressed skepticism about the current Bush administration's missile defense program, saying he would cut investments in unproven systems. During a mid-2007 visit to Poland, the Democratic senator from Illinois said the United States and Poland should cooperate on effective missile defenses, perhaps indicating his opposition to the Third Site.

The Kremlin may believe it is pushing on an open door when it comes to the new Obama administration's willingness to deploy missile defenses in Eastern Europe. However, Medvedev's quintessentially Russian strategy of threaten first, negotiate later may backfire.

Medvedev's actions are reminiscent of Russian Premier Nikita Khrushchev's behavior when he met newly elected President Kennedy in Vienna, Austria, in 1961. JFK's failure to stand up to the Russian leader's bluster led the next year to the Cuban Missile Crisis. In this most "Camelot" of moments, can the new American president afford to appear weak by acquiescing to Russia's demand that the Third Site not be deployed?

The Russian president's threats open up a larger issue. Forward-deployed fixed-site missile defenses could be vulnerable to a host of countermeasures. The Russian president may be deterred from making good on his threats, but what about other U.S. adversaries? Medvedev's statements underscore the importance of mobile missile defense systems that can be deployed when and where needed.

The United States has effective mobile missile defenses against short-range threats -- the sea-based Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System and the land-based Theater High Altitude Air Defense and Patriot systems. What it lacks is a mobile system that can counter long-range threats.

The technology for such a system is within reach: It is the land-based Kinetic Energy Interceptor. KEI could backstop the Third Site, deploying only when a threat emerged and thereby rendering moot any Russian threats. Without a fixed infrastructure, KEI also could provide a flexible solution to the appearance of new long-range ballistic missile threats.

In the event a friendly country changes its mind about supporting missile defense deployments, the KEI entire system is not placed in jeopardy.

Unfortunately, the current Bush administration put KEI on a slow development track. If the new president wants effective missile defenses, he should consider putting KEI on a fast track to deployment.

(Daniel Goure is vice president of the Lexington Institute, an independent think tank in Arlington, Va.)

(United Press International's "Outside View" commentaries are written by outside contributors who specialize in a variety of important issues. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of United Press International. In the interests of creating an open forum, original submissions are invited.)

Share This Article With Planet Earth DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook

Related Links
Learn about missile defense at
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at
All about missiles at
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at

Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News

Russia Offers Missile Crisis As Welcoming Gambit To Next US Admin
Washington (UPI) Nov 6, 2008
U.S. President-elect Barack Obama has just been handed his own version of the Cuban Missile Crisis -- courtesy of incumbent President George W. Bush.

  • China hits out at Indian Foreign Minister's border comments
  • France trumpets EU defences, key plank for NATO future
  • Rice, Lavrov hold direct talks on US-Russia relations
  • Outside View: Obama bad news for Russia

  • Major powers to meet Thursday on Iran nuclear programme: France
  • Russia will abandon missile plans if US cancels shield
  • US says it regrets delay in notifying Japan about nuclear submarine
  • US left nuclear weapon buried under Greenland ice: report

  • Vandenberg Officials Launch Minuteman III Missile
  • USAF Awards Raytheon Contract Option For Maverick Missile Upgrades
  • Raytheon Awarded Contract For Standard Missile-2 Production
  • NKorean base could handle longer-range missile: SKorean minister

  • The Iskander Threat To Europe: Bluff Or Real?
  • Outside View: Obama should back KEI
  • Russia Offers Missile Crisis As Welcoming Gambit To Next US Admin
  • NATO voices 'serious worries' about Russian missile plans

  • China's air show saw four bln dollars in deals: report
  • China plane-makers take first steps to rival global giants
  • Aviation giants look to China amid global turbulence
  • Boeing sees China buying 3,710 planes over next 20 years

  • Honeywell Wins First Production Contract For T-Hawk Micro Air Vehicle
  • Aurora Wins USAF Contract On Vision-Based MAV Guidance
  • Successful Live-Fire Testing Of Shadow TUAS
  • DCNS Achieves Automatic UAV Landing On Frigate

  • Iraq studies US-amended military pact as deadline looms
  • Iraq's cabinet expected to meet on US pact as deadline looms
  • US combat troops in Iraq battle to defend savings
  • Dogs of War: Contractors and Obama

  • Outside View: Russian cops pack new heat
  • Kalashnikov turns 89, a 'happy man' for creating AK-47
  • TenCate Presents New Lightweight Composite Armour Solution
  • Boeing Celebrates 20th Anniversary Of First Avenger Delivery To US Army

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement