. Military Space News .
Iraq says will not be bullied into signing US pact

US to hear Iraqi demands on security pact: Zebari
Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari said on Wednesday that Washington has agreed to listen to changes demanded by Baghdad in a long-negotiated security deal but was unlikely to accept any drastic amendments. "Yes, they are going to listen to the changes," Zebari told AFP. "We will give the amendments in writing. They will study it and get back to us. That is the usual pattern." Zebari said, however, that US officials were unlikely to accept any major changes in the pact, which aims to lay the framework for the long-term presence of US troops in Iraq after 2008. "I don't think they are in mood for renegotiating the deal altogether. We will see in the next few days." On Tuesday, Iraqi cabinet decided to seek changes to the pact despite warnings from top US leaders that a delay in sealing the deal could have potentially dire consequences for the country's security.
by Staff Writers
Baghdad (AFP) Oct 22, 2008
Iraq warned on Wednesday it would not be bullied into signing a security pact with the United States despite US leaders warning of potentially dire consequences if it failed to approve the deal.

Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari said Washington had now agreed to listen to requested changes to the controversial deal, which aims to govern the long-term presence of US troops in Iraq beyond 2008.

But the White House said the agreement, which has been the subject of months of tough negotiations, was more or less done, and any amendments would be merely fine-tuning.

To the apparent frustration of the Americans, the Iraqi cabinet decided on Tuesday to seek revisions to a deal that was originally supposed to have been sealed by the end of July.

But Iraqi government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh lashed out at remarks by US military chief Michael Mullen who had said Baghdad risked significant security losses if an agreement is not concluded.

"It is not correct to force Iraqis into making a choice and it is not appropriate to talk with the Iraqis in this way," Dabbagh said.

The draft deal calls for a withdrawal of US combat forces by the end of 2011 -- more than eight years after the invasion -- and includes US concessions on jurisdiction over its troops accused of "serious crimes" while off duty or off base.

But the draft has ignited fierce debate in Iraq, with radical anti-American Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr leading a wave of protests and even Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's aides voicing dissent.

"Yes, they are going to listen to the changes," Zebari told AFP. "We will give the amendments in writing. They will study it and get back to us."

But he added: "I don't think they are in the mood for renegotiating the deal altogether. We will see in the next few days."

He warned it would be "difficult" to sign before the US presidential vote on November 4, given that the pact still has to go before parliament which can ratify or reject it.

White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said "the door wasn't slammed shut but it's pretty much closed in our opinion."

And the Pentagon again accused US archfoe Iran of seeking to derail the accord.

"Iranian meddling in Iraq takes on all forms" including "an attempt by the Iranians to undermine, undercut, derail the SOFA (status of forces) agreement," spokesman Geoff Morrell said.

US commanders have long accused Shiite Iran of meddling in the affairs of neighbouring Iraq by aiding militia groups in the country, charges denied by Tehran.

But Iranian parliament speaker Ali Larijani, speaking on a visit to Bahrain, said the deal "encroaches on the sovereignty (of Iraq), and does not allow the creation of a strong government."

Mullen had said that if Baghdad delayed signing the deal beyond the December 31 expiry of the current UN mandate, its forces "will not be ready to provide for their security."

"And in that regard there is great potential for losses of significant consequence."

Dabbagh said such a statement was unwelcome.

"All Iraqis and their political entities are aware of their responsibilities and are assessing whether to sign the deal or not in a way that it is suitable to them."

Iraqi military spokesman Brigadier General Qassim Atta also insisted that domestic forces were ready to handle security nationwide, saying their numbers had increased and that they were already controlling 11 provinces.

Iraq is also due on Thursday to take over security in the southern province of Babil, the 12th of 18 in the country.

"Mullen's remark is an attempt to pressure the Iraqi side, but we will not be subjected to such tactics because our reservations are linked to the sovereignty and national interest of Iraq," senior Shiite MP Abbas al-Bayati said.

"The American side should be more flexible because if they really want to pass this agreement, they should first stop launching such warnings which provoke Iraqis."

Some cabinet ministers oppose a clause that allows Iraq to ask US forces to stay beyond 2011 if required for training local troops, raising fears that this could lead to a long-term presence.

Science and Technology Minister Raed Jahed Fahmi also said there were concerns over what would constitute "serious crimes" committed by American personnel for which they could be prosecuted under Iraqi law.

burs/txw/hc

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
Iraq: The first technology war of the 21st century



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


US insists draft Iraq security pact is 'good text'
Washington (AFP) Oct 21, 2008
The US State Department insisted Tuesday that a controversial draft security pact with Iraq is a "good, solid text," but stopped short of saying it might renegotiate it.







  • French minister opposes Georgia, Ukraine entry to NATO
  • Outside View: China's silent dominance
  • A Revolution In Russian Military Affairs Part One
  • Russian Military Machine Running On Fumes Part Two

  • Russia launches 31-year-old Stiletto missile
  • McCain raises specter of nuclear war
  • Nuclear incident would make 9/11 'insignificant': nuke commission
  • Iranian Pilots Show Off Dogfighting Skills In War Games

  • US Navy Launches Raytheon Tomahawk Block IV From Submarine
  • Army And LM Support Second Successful International PAC-3 Missile Test
  • Russia denies missile sales to Iran
  • NKorea prepares mass missile launches: reports

  • Russia Sends Out The Nuke Bombers For Week Long Exercises
  • Russia sees no point to more US missile talks: report
  • Russia expects access to US defence shield in Czech Republic: reports
  • Swords and Shields: Russia shields Syria

  • Energy Department has high school contest
  • Researchers Scientists Perform High Altitude Experiments
  • Airbus expecting 'large' China order by early 2009: CEO
  • Airbus globalises production with China plant

  • DCNS Achieves Automatic UAV Landing On Frigate
  • Successful Live-Fire Testing Of Shadow TUAS
  • AAI Receives Contract For Additional Shadow TUAS
  • TAAC 2008 Unmanned Aircraft Systems Conference

  • US, Iraq will get security pact 'worked out,' Rice says
  • Iran wants to undermine US-Iraq troops deal: Pentagon
  • Iran says US-Baghdad pact harms Iraq sovereignty
  • Iraq says will not be bullied into signing US pact

  • Raytheon Receives Contract For Development Of Excalibur 1b
  • Raytheon Receives Contract For Production Of Towed Decoys
  • Smart Bombs Score Another Hit In Extended Range Tests
  • Raytheon Air-to-Air Missile Enters Weapons System User Program

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement