. Military Space News .
SUPERPOWERS
Uncertain World: Arguments Against Russia Joining NATO

NATO begins work on half-billion-euro HQ
Brussels (AFP) Dec 16, 2010 - NATO laid the first stone Thursday for its half-billion-euro headquarters, already one year behind schedule, that will replace a Cold War-era complex used since 1967 as a temporary facility. "In building these new headquarters, we are making a clear statement: that the Alliance will continue to play a major role in maintaining international peace and stability," said NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen. "In an unpredictable world, NATO is here to stay. And NATO will stay here in Brussels," he said at a groundbreaking ceremony alongside Belgian Prime Minister Yves Leterme. Slated for completion in June 2015, the 251,000-square-metre building is being built across the street from the current headquarters, where 4,000 people from the 28-nation alliance work.

The groundbreaking for the new complex comes one month after NATO leaders agreed to cut 5,000 staff in its military command structure across several nations, saving what officials said would be millions of euros. The Western alliance hastily moved from Paris to Brussels in 1967, one year after French President Charles De Gaulle pulled his country out of NATO's integrated military command over perceived US dominance. France returned to NATO's command last year. The new complex, estimated to cost 480 million euros in 2003, was designed by US and Belgian architectural firms. It is being built on a 40-hectare lot that once housed military barracks.
by Fyodor Lukyanov
Moscow, Russia (RIA Novosti) Dec 17, 2010
This past year saw a lot of speculation about whether Russia will ultimately join NATO. Prominent analysts and former politicians took to the pages of Western publications to voice their opinion on the desirability of Russian membership.

The NATO Strategic Concept Expert Group, chaired by former U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, held a lively discussion on the issue, but the conclusions of the "wise men," as the group is often called, were not included in the draft of the alliance's new strategy.

In Russia, pro-Western liberals from the Institute of Contemporary Development (INSOR) and even high-ranking officials are mulling the possibility. After the NATO summit in Lisbon, where the atmosphere was quite friendly toward Russia, two high-ranking Russian officials acknowledged that it's possible that Russia could join NATO in the future.

These were deputy chief of the Kremlin staff, Vladislav Surkov, and director of the Foreign Ministry's policy planning department, Alexander Kramarenko.

Where could all of this be leading?

The fact that the possibility is being discussed at all signifies a major change in the international situation. NATO has clearly outlived itself. It has no new goals on the horizon. It has not become the world's police officer, and the only remaining problem in its initial zone of responsibility - Europe - is unsettled relations with Moscow.

Putting Russian-NATO relations on a solid footing - which should start with the sides abandoning worn-out perceptions of each other - could give a new purpose to NATO as a regional organization.

Russia is gradually overcoming a perception of NATO as the main threat to its security. The current tenor of its relations with the alliance is just an echo from the past. It's not clear when the echo will die out, and it is becoming more and more dissonant compared to other sounds in the world, especially in Asia.

The recent disturbance on the Korean Peninsula could be a mild prelude to very painful events. The deepest fault line runs between the United States and China, which the development logic is pushing into confrontation with each other. The outcome is unclear, but such a confrontation is becoming increasingly probable.

The results of such confrontation will be vitally important to Russia since it does not want being used as bargaining chip in U.S.-Chinese relations. Also, it must not allow itself to be pushed to the frontline of their confrontation on either side.

Against this backdrop, an institutional rapprochement between Russia and NATO would signify Russia's movement toward an organization and a part of the world whose global importance is shrinking. Moreover, this could affect its relations with China, which will certainly suspect NATO and Russia of plotting against it, no matter what arguments Moscow may use to prove otherwise.

Actually, China would feel like Russia did when it learned of Ukraine's intention to join NATO - all the more so given that the joint ballistic missile shield discussed at the Lisbon summit could be directed against China.

Only the prospect of significant gains could justify risking a major deterioration in political relations with a huge neighbor, which everyone expects to become even more influential in the world. But it is impossible to imagine NATO pledging to guarantee Russia's security in either the east or the south.

If Russia joins NATO, it will be the one providing security, not receiving it, just as the United States currently provides security to its NATO allies. I know this all sounds incredibly unlikely now given the attitude of some new NATO members to Russia, but many events in the past 20 years seemed absolutely impossible until they happened.

The underlying principle of military-political alliances in the 21st century will most likely differ from the 20th century, when they were based on shared ideology or values.

In the coming decades, alliances will probably be formed to achieve a concrete objective. As Donald Rumsfeld once said, "The mission determines the coalition - the coalition must not determine the mission." This phrase proved to be more lasting than his political career.

Should Russia take on additional commitments by becoming a formal member of an alliance, this would only constrain its ability to respond to surprise developments, which are certain to occur.

Had the possibility of Russia joining NATO been raised 10 or 15 years ago, the atmosphere would have been quite different. At that time, the alliance seemed to have no alternative in the sphere of security. Russia was ready to show restraint, and China was not a decisive factor. But it did not happen then, and now there are too many new circumstances to consider the possibility seriously.

The largely virtual NATO-Russia rivalry must be laid to rest, primarily so that the sides can stop spending time and effort on conflicts rooted in the past. This would facilitate economic progress, as it would rid commercial relations of undue suspicion.

But having Russia as a NATO member would do nothing to address the real security problems of the 21st century, which should be addressed in a new format, ideally a trilateral format involving Russia, China and the Untied States. Although they have different interests and approaches, they have the strategic weight necessary to deal with problems in Central Eurasia, Russia's Far East and the Pacific region.

America's European allies are unlikely to get involved in events so far from the Old World after extricating themselves from the Afghan quagmire. Russia may find it difficult to determine its role in such a format, but one thing is for sure: NATO, with its 20th-century guidelines and limited effectiveness, would only make things harder for Russia.

Fyodor Lukyanov is Editor-in-Chief of the Russia in Global Affairs journal - the most authoritative source of expertise on Russian foreign policy and global developments. He is also a frequent commentator on international affairs and contributes to various media in the U.S., Europe and China, including academic journals Social Research, Europe-Asia Studies, Columbia Journal of International Affairs. Mr. Lukyanov is a senior member of the Council on Foreign and Defense Policy and a member of the Presidential Council on Human Rights and Civic Society Institutions. He holds a degree from Moscow State University.

Source: RIA Novosti



Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
-
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


SUPERPOWERS
NATO begins work on half-billion-euro HQ
Brussels (AFP) Dec 16, 2010
NATO laid the first stone Thursday for its half-billion-euro headquarters, already one year behind schedule, that will replace a Cold War-era complex used since 1967 as a temporary facility. "In building these new headquarters, we are making a clear statement: that the Alliance will continue to play a major role in maintaining international peace and stability," said NATO Secretary General A ... read more







SUPERPOWERS
First European Missile Successfully Carries Out Ballistic Intercept

Poland asked US about missile shield uses: WikiLeaks

Israel general drops missile defense bombshell

SBIRS Completes Major Testing Milestone

SUPERPOWERS
French missiles to Lebanon raise Israel 'concerns'

Western Military District Gets First Iskander Tactical Missile System

India to boost its Akash missile arsenal

Taiwan trumpets cruise missile production

SUPERPOWERS
US drone missiles kill 25 in Pakistan

France to decide on MALE drone soon

Critical Global Hawk Sensor Delivered To USAF

Fire-X Vertical Unmanned Aircraft Completes First Flight

SUPERPOWERS
Arianespace Will Orbit Sicral 2 Milcomms Satellites

Codan Receives JITC Certification For 2110 HF Manpack

Northrop Grumman Bids for Marine Corps Common Aviation CnC

DSP Satellite System Celebrates 40 Years

SUPERPOWERS
ITT Extends Counter-IED Leadership

Raytheon Intelligence-Sharing System Begins Operations

Obama to sign end to military gay ban

US officer faces prison in 'birther' court martial

SUPERPOWERS
Russia And India Fix T-50 Fighter Design Contract

US DoD Fears Budget Axe

Bulgaria cuts back military plane orders: minister

Peace experts blast German arms sales

SUPERPOWERS
Coastguard officials may be punished for video leak: report

Japan labels China's military a global concern

Uncertain World: Arguments Against Russia Joining NATO

New Zealand wooed China to curb US influence: report

SUPERPOWERS
Navy test fires electromagnetic cannon

Joint High Power Solid State Laser Keeps Lasing And Lasing

Boeing Installing Beam Control System On HEL Laser Demonstrator

Maritime Laser System Shows Higher Lethality At Longer Ranges


The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2010 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement