. Military Space News .
The Space Station Who Needs It

The Americans are not eager to reveal the details of their space cooperation with Russia. They have plenty of irons in the fire as it is, and the Space Shuttle program seems to be one of them. But what has all this to do with ISS activities, at least from an American point of view? In all probability, nothing. Although the American administration declared the station a "national laboratory," NASA has set its sights elsewhere. The Moon and Mars dominate NASA's politics and economy.
by Andrei Kislyakov
Moscow (RIA Novosti) Sep 09, 2008
As the International Space Station nears its 10th anniversary on November 20, all the members of this unique research program seem to have overwhelmingly come out for it.

The United States, which has been skeptical about it, has suddenly developed an interest, especially in how its crews are to be taken to the station after its Space Shuttle program winds up in 2010.

Unfortunately, the renewed American interest in the ISS is neither because of concern for the station's future, nor because of the coming anniversary. The cause was provided by the Caucasian crisis. And had it not happened, the American participation in the program would have ended quietly, despite all assurances to the contrary.

But what has so agitated NASA in recent weeks? The future of the station itself or of its largest, American, segment? Neither. The Americans are horrified at the prospect of dealing with the Russian Space Agency (Roscosmos) one-to-one, when it becomes the only crew carrier for the ISS.

NASA's shuttles are expected to retire in 2010, while the new ship, Orion, is not scheduled to enter service until 2015. For five years the Americans will have to go to Russia cap-in-hand.

In fact, the United States raised this issue before the outbreak of hostilities in the Caucasus. NASA director Michael Griffin was many times quoted as saying that America would fall under Russia's thumb when the Space Shuttle program bowed out. And that, he said, could deprive the U.S. of trump cards in its diplomatic game with Russia.

The Georgian attack mixed up all cards, at least in space. So much so that both presidential hopefuls decided to make space research a plank of their respective electoral platforms.

John McCain was the first to do so. Together with two other Republican senators, he urged President George W. Bush not to delay the retirement of the shuttles to reduce the possibility of dependence on Russia.

He was unlikely to have been unaware of NASA' own initiatives as he appealed to the president. By the end of September Griffin had ordered a review of possible retirement dates for shuttles. What the outcome will be is difficult to judge. But one thing is clear: the Americans do not want to be left without a fleet of manned space vehicles of their own.

In this context the Russian-American talks on using Soyuz rockets to carry American crews to the station that concluded at the end of August were a mere formality. Viktor Ramishevsky, deputy head of Roscosmos, said "it is practically sewn up that American astronauts will travel to the International Space Station on Russian Soyuz spacecraft." But he added that the timeline of the agreement was not yet defined.

He also said "no one will abandon the station if for some reason one of the states stops visiting it."

The Americans are not eager to reveal the details of their space cooperation with Russia. They have plenty of irons in the fire as it is, and the Space Shuttle program seems to be one of them.

But what has all this to do with ISS activities, at least from an American point of view? In all probability, nothing. Although the American administration declared the station a "national laboratory," NASA has set its sights elsewhere. The Moon and Mars dominate NASA's politics and economy.

The agency is not particularly secretive about its other plans. The station's future, therefore, calls for no special consideration. A year or so ago, according to NASA officials, the agency negotiated with some public and private bodies the use of the American segment of the station for micro-gravity research, starting in 2010.

Well done, the Americans. Building high-end premises and letting them out to prospective users, while they themselves proceed further.

And questions about what their partners should do and who really needs the ISS are not for them to answer.

The opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not necessarily represent those of RIA Novosti.

Source: RIA Novosti

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
ISS
Space Analysis and Space OpEds



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


One Small Step Takes Mankind Nowhere
Nyack, NY (SPX) Jul 17, 2008
We put a man on the Moon. Then settled back to watch the characters of sci-fi movies and TV shows make it look common place. Fun, but not quite the same as being there. The fact that we're over 35 years past the last time we walked on the Moon may make us think we've lost our cosmic mojo. The creators of the Space Frontier Foundation beg to differ.







  • Outside View: Russia-NATO split -- Part Two
  • Euro-Russo Split Widens Part One
  • Russian Nuke Cruise In Venezuela Manoeuvres As US Watches
  • Japan Sees Opportunity For New Asian Renaissance

  • Clinton questions US freeze on Russian nuclear pact
  • NKorea to stage massive parade to mark anniversary
  • NKorea's Kim may have suffered stroke: US intelligence
  • Rice makes 'full-court press' to win US approval of nuke deal

  • US Navy Conducts Second Test Of Raytheon's Standard Missile-6
  • Diehl Signs Contract With SENER For IRIS-T Surface-to-Air Missile
  • Lockheed Martin Receives Contract For Guided MLRS Unitary Rockets
  • Taiwan won't deploy longer-range missiles: report

  • Anti Missile Showdown Building Between East And West
  • Outside View: BMD blowback -- Part Two
  • Outside View: BMD blowback -- Part One
  • Outside View: BMD dilemmas -- Part Two

  • Safer Skies For The Flying Public
  • Chinese airlines fly into headwinds in Olympic year
  • The M2-F1 - An Aircraft Without Wings
  • China's Tianjin building runway for Airbus test flights: report

  • Elbit Systems' Hermes 450 Records Another Success
  • Robotic helicopters teach themselves
  • Industrial 6-Rotor Unmanned Helicopter Provides HighDef Video And Imaging
  • LockMart Demos Airspace Deconfliction Of Multiple UAVs

  • Cache By Cache Baghdad Being Disarmed By US Forces Part Two
  • Bush to unveil Iraq troop decision Tuesday
  • Cache By Cache Baghdad Being Disarmed By US Forces
  • Bush likely to unveil Iraq troop decision next week

  • GD Awarded Contract For M1A1 Abrams Tank Upgrades
  • ITT's FRCS Achieves No-Jam Success At Exercise Red Flag
  • The Power Of Armour In The Early 21st Century
  • ATK Awarded Comtract To Develop Multi-Stage Supersonic Target

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement