The weekend decision of the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group to approve the unprecedented nuclear cooperation deal between the United States and India changes the strategic map of Asia. It also provides President George Bush with a last, critical success that may be seen by historians as the most far-reaching achievement of his presidency.

The Democrats in the U.S. Congress, who must give a final endorsement, may seek to deprive Bush of his triumph. But, given the impressive lobbying and fundraising skills of America's wealthy and well-educated Indian community, they would be ill advised to try. Moreover, the platform of the Democratic Party, as agreed at last month's convention, stresses: "With India, we will build on the close partnership developed over the past decade. As two of the world's great, multiethnic democracies, the U.S. and India are natural strategic allies."

The deal would bring India out of its pariah status as a rogue nuclear power that had not signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty and would allow the country to obtain the nuclear fuels and technology seen as essential to India's soaring energy needs. And in formally joining the nuclear club, without joining the NPT regime, India would maintain the right to keep some of its nuclear reactors for military use out of the international inspection regime and thus gets something close to a free hand for future nuclear development.

By far, the most important feature of the deal is its sealing of the new strategic relationship, which might almost be called an alliance, between the world's largest democracy and its most powerful. The U.S.-Indian relationship, which was cool and sometimes even hostile throughout the Cold War, now joins the existing U.S.-Japanese alliance as the most important strategic relationship in Asia.

For China, which now can see the prospect of encirclement by the United States, India and Japan, this presages a new security environment in Asia, a system of insurance and potential control against China's ambition to become the dominant Asian power. China has only itself to blame for this, with its construction of ports and possible naval bases in Burma and Pakistan that India understandably saw as threatening.

This is the context that explains the angry reaction in Beijing, where the Communist Party's official paper, People's Daily, wrote, "The U.S.-India nuclear agreement has constituted a major blow to the international non-proliferation regime."

This is breathtaking in its hypocrisy. China has done more to destroy the non-proliferation regime than any other country. As former U.S. Air Force Secretary Thomas Reed, who used to be a nuclear weapons lab scientist, has revealed, China gave Pakistan blueprints for a simple uranium atomic bomb in 1982 and later tested a Pakistani version of the weapon in China on May 26, 1990. A declassified State Department memo obtained by the National Security Archive in Washington and since published in The New York Times concluded that China, some time after its first bomb test in 1964, had provided Pakistan with the technology for "fissile material production and possibly also nuclear device design."

"The Chinese nuclear weapons program is incredibly sophisticated," Reed claims. "The scary part is how much Pakistan has learned from them."

The really scary part is what Pakistan's top nuclear scientist, A.Q. Khan, then did with the Chinese technology, building a kind of nuclear technology supermarket whose wares since have been traced to Libya, Iran and North Korea.

By contrast, India has an impeccable record of non-proliferation, although critics of the U.S. deal warn that it establishes a precedent that allows India to develop both civil and military nuclear capabilities without signing the NPT. The implications of this precedent for Iran are significant.

Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh staked his political career on the deal and on the personal relationship he had forged with Bush. Singh broke the political coalition in India's Parliament on which his power depended to force the deal through, despite the bitter opposition and walkout of his Communist Party allies.

The Politburo of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) issued a bitter statement Saturday, saying: "The Manmohan Singh government stands thoroughly exposed before the country for compromising India's vital security interests. Proceeding with this deal will mortgage India's sovereignty and make India's civilian nuclear program vulnerable to U.S. blackmail for the next 40 years."

India overcame the opposition within the Nuclear Suppliers Group by promising to maintain its longstanding rules against nuclear proliferation commitments and also to maintain its voluntary moratorium on future nuclear tests. (Modern computer modeling systems make this far less onerous than it sounds.)

The Bush administration, which lobbied hard for the deal during the three-day meeting of the NSG, has also assured Congress that it has the right to block India's supplies of nuclear fuel and energy if it resumes testing. A letter to the House Foreign Affairs Committee, released Friday by committee Chairman Howard Berman, D-Calif., noted, "The fuel supply assurances are not, however, meant to insulate India against the consequences of a nuclear explosive test or a violation of non-proliferation commitments."

earlier related report
India nuclear deal does not send message to Iran: Germany
Berlin (AFP) Sept 8, 2008
Germany expressed grudging acceptance Monday of a landmark atomic energy deal with India and denied it undermined the West's efforts to convince Iran to stop sensitive nuclear work.

Foreign ministry spokesman Jens Ploetner said Germany -- as chair of the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group, which controls the export and sale of nuclear technology -- had tried to balance conflicting interests during tense negotiations that led the agreement.

"There were several countries that put critical questions to India, but also the United States, about how this arrangement is compatible with the common goal of nuclear non-proliferation," he told a news conference.

"It is not an ideal solution. The negotiations were very difficult and we cannot say that we could not have imagined something better."

But asked whether the pact contradicted the West's united opposition to Iran's controversial nuclear programme, Ploetner said the Nuclear Suppliers Group had underscored the goal of non-proliferation with the agreement.

"Does this agreement send an approving message to Iran? No, it absolutely does not," he said, calling India a "special case."

Ploetner added that the approval of the United Nations' nuclear watchdog, the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), had been decisive in winning approval.

Germany is among six countries working to convince Tehran to abandon uranium enrichment, which the West fears is a pretence for building an Iranian nuclear weapon.

Iran says its nuclear programme is for civilian purposes only, as it refuses to comply with UN Security Council demands to halt uranium enrichment.

After intense lobbying from Washington and New Delhi, the Nuclear Suppliers Group approved a waiver of restrictions on nuclear trade with India.

India finally made a "formal declaration" Friday to stand by its non-proliferation commitments and uphold its moratorium on tests, leading to a breakthrough in the negotiations.

But certain countries, including Japan, warned it would weaken global efforts at non-proliferation, particularly in light of the standoff with Iran over its nuclear programme.

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Share This Article With Planet Earth

del.icio.us	Digg	Reddit
YahooMyWeb	Google	Facebook

Related Links
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com
Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com
All about missiles at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com

Memory Foam Mattress Review

SPACE MEDIA NETWORK PROMOTIONS Solar Energy Solutions Tempur-Pedic Mattress Comparison ... Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News