. | . |
Why The US Needs More C-17s
Arlington, Va. (UPI) Mar 24, 2009 It has begun to dawn on many observers that U.S. President Barack Obama doesn't care much about defense. He honors the nation's war fighters and supports their programs, but his heart lies elsewhere -- mainly in reforming the economy and building a more equitable society. So his pronouncements on the military tend to be formulaic, while the setting of defense priorities is left largely to his Pentagon team. That makes any direct endorsement of a weapons program by the president unusual and worthy of mention. There were precious few of those during the election season, but he did cite at least one aircraft program by name: the Boeing C-17 Globemaster airlifter. In his principal campaign-trail statement on military strategy, candidate Obama said: "We need greater investment in advanced technology ranging from the revolutionary, like unmanned aerial vehicles and electronic-warfare capabilities, to systems like the C-17 cargo and KC-X air refueling aircraft -- which may not be glamorous to politicians but are the backbone of our future ability to extend global power." Obama did not single out any other aircraft in his statement for such recognition. Why the C-17? The fact that it is the last military aircraft built in Los Angeles certainly helped. But the candidate could have bolstered his election chances more by embracing the Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey or the Boeing F/A-18 Super Hornet, both of which are built in swing states. Instead, he cited the C-17 because that program epitomizes where Obama's advisers think the military needs to go in the future: toward greater agility, reach and versatility. The C-17 is the newest jet transport in the joint force and, by most accounts, the best strategic airlifter ever built. "Strategic" in this context means intercontinental, but the C-17 has also proven remarkably agile in shorter-range, "tactical" roles. It can lift cargo as unwieldy as the 70-ton Abrams tank out of airstrips only 1,000 meters long and maneuver easily on the ground thanks to its ability to use thrust reversers to move backward as well as forward. The exceptionally high readiness rates of the plane combined with low operating costs make it a case study in American ingenuity. The only real problem with the C-17 is that the U.S. Air Force lacks the money to buy a sufficient number. Chief of Staff Gen. Norton Schwartz said that 205 C-17s combined with 111 older Lockheed Martin C-5 Galaxies form an adequate fleet of strategic airlifters because the service also has access to commercial cargo planes. But airliners can't move tanks, and the C-5s have suffered from chronic readiness problems that will only be partly fixed by providing the planes with new engines and electronics. The C-17 will be the backbone of the airlift fleet for decades to come, and 205 isn't nearly enough to cover the world. Consider all the new airlift missions that are emerging. Humanitarian relief and disaster assistance. Transport of the U.S. Army's Future Combat Systems family of vehicles. Rapid deployment of theater missile defenses. Counterinsurgency and nation-building in places like Africa. With ground forces growing and global roles proliferating, the list of emerging missions gets quite long, many of them requiring a plane like the C-17 that can land in remote, rugged locations. But despite purchases by allies such as Canada and the United Kingdom, the list of remaining C-17 orders to be filled is not long at all. In fact, the line will have to begin shutting down this year if more orders are not received -- which would hobble the joint force when it desperately needs the mobility C-17 provides. (Loren B. Thompson is chief operating officer of the Lexington Institute, an Arlington, Va.-based think tank that supports democracy and the free market.) Share This Article With Planet Earth
Related Links The latest in Military Technology for the 21st century at SpaceWar.com
Why The F-22 Is Vital Part Six Washington (UPI) Mar 20, 2009 For some nations that are adversaries of the United States, the solution to the challenge of neutralizing U.S. intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance systems is near at hand. Positioning of advanced surface-to-air missiles along border regions can put all current unmanned ISR platforms at risk of being unable to survey crisis areas. |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |